The gender gap

[pErvinalia]

One of mine is that they rewrite history. It wouldn't be so off-putting, were it not so clearly pushing a political agenda.

Most history is written through a political lens.

For example (I don't shy away from specifics, the way that many need to around feminism) they crow on and on about how women got the vote, but never talk about how men got it.

That's not rewriting history. That's focussing on a particular aspect of it.

Another is their using their sexuality to obtain power. A hilarious example of this which is pretty current, is to look at the weaponization of complaint systems.

Got any evidence of wide spread weaponisation of the complaint system?

A third one is their nearly universal 'anti-male' stance. You can see this most clearly when they push an opinion that MRA's are bad, and then fail to address specific MRA's, or their specific claims which are 'bad'. It's simply trying to make it unfashionable for their followers to view the other side of what SHOULD be an open discussion.

Being anti-MRA isn't being anti-male. Where did you "learn" logic?

I do respect your effort here though. It's tough to take any position which doesn't kowtow to feminism without risking wrathful words and actions from some of the louder ones.

Why would Rum risk wrathful words? His posts are considered, nuanced and detailed. The reason people like you and your twat mate whose name I've forgotten get wrathful words is that you are so openly and simplistically anti-female.

[pErvinalia]

While people insist on delusional thinking, that men and women are really equal in all respects, you will never make any progress.
Because anyone watching women play football, or being pestered by women to fix this, or can you have a look at my car, or to do a simple thing like put up a shelf, or to "drive me to London because I can only drive local roads" knows that it's bollocks.
I never get asked to do that stuff by men.

Modern technology has gone a long way towards levelling the playing field, but what's the point in this pretence that we are the same, or equal when everyone knows it's bollock?

When I try to point this out, I am invariably offered examples of just how women can do as well as men. In most jobs that most people encounter, that may be true, but there is a hilarious example available to anyone who enjoys Reality TV

The fact that they so seldom allow this kind of demonstration to take place is funny as well.

Jesus fucking Christ.

[Cunt]

Another is their using their sexuality to obtain power. A hilarious example of this which is pretty current, is to look at the weaponization of complaint systems.

Got any evidence of wide spread weaponisation of the complaint system?

Why do you think it is widespread? And why are you collecting evidence?

My first guess is that, in your new MRA club, you feel the need to be an active activist. I'm afraid you will have to do your own research here though.

All I meant was that you can see examples of 'using their sexuality to gain power' in such cases. There are cases where women use their sexuality to gain power and it isn't as gross, but that wasn't the subject.

A third one is their nearly universal 'anti-male' stance. You can see this most clearly when they push an opinion that MRA's are bad, and then fail to address specific MRA's, or their specific claims which are 'bad'. It's simply trying to make it unfashionable for their followers to view the other side of what SHOULD be an open discussion.

Being anti-MRA isn't being anti-male. Where did you "learn" logic?

This comes right back to the question you declined to answer. If you want to talk about MRA's, you'll have to provide examples. When I asked before, and you failed to provide any from youtube or such, I started doubting your seriousness.

I know you are just trolling, because you still haven't answered.

[pErvinalia]

Another is their using their sexuality to obtain power. A hilarious example of this which is pretty current, is to look at the weaponization of complaint systems.

Got any evidence of wide spread weaponisation of the complaint system?

Why do you think it is widespread? And why are you collecting evidence?

My first guess is that, in your new MRA club, you feel the need to be an active activist. I'm afraid you will have to do your own research here though.

All I meant was that you can see examples of 'using their sexuality to gain power' in such cases. There are cases where women use their sexuality to gain power and it isn't as gross, but that wasn't the subject.

So no evidence then.

MRA_count = MRA_count + 1.

A third one is their nearly universal 'anti-male' stance. You can see this most clearly when they push an opinion that MRA's are bad, and then fail to address specific MRA's, or their specific claims which are 'bad'. It's simply trying to make it unfashionable for their followers to view the other side of what SHOULD be an open discussion.

Being anti-MRA isn't being anti-male. Where did you "learn" logic?

This comes right back to the question you declined to answer. If you want to talk about MRA's, you'll have to provide examples. When I asked before, and you failed to provide any from youtube or such, I started doubting your seriousness.

I know you are just trolling, because you still haven't answered.

You are making claims that you aren't backing up. Stop red-herringing. The problem here is your abysmal logic and refusal to back up your claims. YOU are the one who introduced MRA's here, not me.

[Cunt]

Another is their using their sexuality to obtain power. A hilarious example of this which is pretty current, is to look at the weaponization of complaint systems.

Got any evidence of wide spread weaponisation of the complaint system?

Why do you think it is widespread? And why are you collecting evidence?

My first guess is that, in your new MRA club, you feel the need to be an active activist. I'm afraid you will have to do your own research here though.

All I meant was that you can see examples of 'using their sexuality to gain power' in such cases. There are cases where women use their sexuality to gain power and it isn't as gross, but that wasn't the subject.

So no evidence then.

MRA_count = MRA_count + 1.

A third one is their nearly universal 'anti-male' stance. You can see this most clearly when they push an opinion that MRA's are bad, and then fail to address specific MRA's, or their specific claims which are 'bad'. It's simply trying to make it unfashionable for their followers to view the other side of what SHOULD be an open discussion.

Being anti-MRA isn't being anti-male. Where did you "learn" logic?

This comes right back to the question you declined to answer. If you want to talk about MRA's, you'll have to provide examples. When I asked before, and you failed to provide any from youtube or such, I started doubting your seriousness.

I know you are just trolling, because you still haven't answered.

You are making claims that you aren't backing up. Stop red-herringing. The problem here is your abysmal logic and refusal to back up your claims. YOU are the one who introduced MRA's here, not me.

you demand evidence for a claim I didn't make.
I didn't claim it was widespread. That's why I asked you why you think it is.

I also note that you still can't provide an answer about MRA's, so I can't value your opinion on this above 'trolling'.

[pErvinalia]

Another is their using their sexuality to obtain power. A hilarious example of this which is pretty current, is to look at the weaponization of complaint systems.

Got any evidence of wide spread weaponisation of the complaint system?

Why do you think it is widespread? And why are you collecting evidence?

My first guess is that, in your new MRA club, you feel the need to be an active activist. I'm afraid you will have to do your own research here though.

All I meant was that you can see examples of 'using their sexuality to gain power' in such cases. There are cases where women use their sexuality to gain power and it isn't as gross, but that wasn't the subject.

So no evidence then.

MRA_count = MRA_count + 1.

A third one is their nearly universal 'anti-male' stance. You can see this most clearly when they push an opinion that MRA's are bad, and then fail to address specific MRA's, or their specific claims which are 'bad'. It's simply trying to make it unfashionable for their followers to view the other side of what SHOULD be an open discussion.

Being anti-MRA isn't being anti-male. Where did you "learn" logic?

This comes right back to the question you declined to answer. If you want to talk about MRA's, you'll have to provide examples. When I asked before, and you failed to provide any from youtube or such, I started doubting your seriousness.

I know you are just trolling, because you still haven't answered.

You are making claims that you aren't backing up. Stop red-herringing. The problem here is your abysmal logic and refusal to back up your claims. YOU are the one who introduced MRA's here, not me.

you demand evidence for a claim I didn't make.
I didn't claim it was widespread. That's why I asked you why you think it is.

You said it's a problem you have with feminism. If it's not widespread then it's not representative of feminism.

I also note that you still can't provide an answer about MRA's, so I can't value your opinion on this above 'trolling'.

MRA_count = MRA_count + 1. (The count must be up to at least 20. I think that's a record, even for you).

[Cunt]

You said it's a problem you have with feminism. If it's not widespread then it's not representative of feminism.
.

No I didn't.

And you still haven't even pretended you can answer my question.

Must be your new club hazing you.

[pErvinalia]

You said it's a problem you have with feminism. If it's not widespread then it's not representative of feminism.
.

No I didn't.

trolololol. It was one of your criticisms of feminism.

[Cunt]

Go look at what I said. Compare it with what you said. Make your point, if you have one.
Most of all, keep ignoring that simple question and I'll feel no obligation to take you seriously.

[rainbow]

[pErvinalia]

Go look at what I said.

WTF?!? Are you taking trolling to new levels? You know it was only one page ago that you made this remark, right?

"Another [criticism of feminism] is their using their sexuality to obtain power. A hilarious example of this which is pretty current, is to look at the weaponization of complaint systems.

Make your point, if you have one.

My point is that you are a bullshitter and when called out on your bullshit you revert to trolling.

[Cunt]

Most of all, keep ignoring that simple question and I'll feel no obligation to take you seriously.

You missed the second part of the instructions.

Here it is again.

[pErvinalia]

trolololol

[Forty Two]

Gee, look who's involved in derailing another thread.

[Galaxian]

When you don't have a credible argument, just say "Jesus Christ".
Well, it's worked well for 2,000 years I guess.

And we notice that they NEVER have any cogent argument. All they provide is one-liners & knee-jerk reactions based on bigotry (look it up).

We go to the trouble of doing research, posting links, and proposing logical sequences. But we get: "racist!, sexist! , victim blamer! etc.

Galaxian can also upload 40,000 posts, if they're banal, BS one-liners. But intelligent people prefer not to stoop to that level.

The rational, impartial intellect has no difficulty considering: If men tend to do this & women tend to do that, could it be that they're biologically/neurologically suited for those differences? But the empty-heads come back with a glib reply, just for the hell of it, "oh, that's pre-determinism!" "You can't say that men are more technically minded, and women more domestically inclined.... NO! That's sexism. It's only culture that does it! So we'll force them to be different ".

Well, namby-pamby do-gooder social nanny enforcers... it will not work. Because Nature stands in your way. Natural Selection simply selects the fittest, not the most bleedin' heart SJWs.

And talking of Natural Selection. It's in action right now with a vengeance: 17 years left reality-deniers...17 years left