Scientific Proof Of God
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
No undertaking of consequence can happen without propaganda, whether it be good of bad. A good forceful statement of the truth is propaganda, But propaganda becomes a vicious ideology when its authors consciously, unconsciously, or deliberately spread what they know to be lies, or when their aim is known to harm the public good i.e., atheism, commercialism. war mongering, racism, sexism, etc...
- rainbow
- Posts: 13765
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
- About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet. - Location: Africa
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
On the other hand, engaging with stupidverse merely encourages it.pErvinalia wrote:False dichotomy.superuniverse wrote:I believe the indoctrination from the religious is preferable to the indoctrination from Coca-Cola and Nike...
And indoctrination is indoctrination.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4
BArF−4
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60798
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yeah.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
So he cant exist anywhere.Brian Peacock wrote:The one he must exists in.Scot Dutchy wrote:Explain the first cause of god in which universe?
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
This is not true. The answer is: death is the end of life. Those who think there is life after death live in lalaland.superuniverse wrote:you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
It is quite tough for some people to accept the finality of death. Perhaps that's what drove our man bonkers.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yes. I suspect that the promise of life after death is the main attraction of the Christian and the Muslim superstitions.Rum wrote:It is quite tough for some people to accept the finality of death.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- superuniverse
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
He just seems to be missing one possible cause - GOD?
TOLD YOU SO!
Last edited by superuniverse on Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39996
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
It's not that atheism is growing, but that religion is wilting and dying. As you say, in the absence of religion atheism is the default state. Religionists have trouble with this concept because they've been programmed and triggered to view atheist as a competing belief system - which it obviously isn't.pErvinalia wrote:Atheism is the default state of everyone. It's only through the indoctrination by the religious 1%ers that anyone believes this made up bollocks. And as time progresses, we are seeing atheism growing as education standards increase.superuniverse wrote:Now this is the "humanist" argument:
RELIGION PROVIDES AN ANTIDOTE TO THE FEAR AND TERROR OF DEATH. IT ALLOWS PEOPLE TO BEAR CATASTROPHE OR ANY TYPE OF LOSS IN THIS LIFE WITH GREATER FORTITUDE. IT DEPRIVES DEATH OF MUCH OF ITS TERROR, SINCE KNOWING THAT A GOOD PERSON WILL SURVIVE IN THE AFTER-LIFE MAKES DEALING WITH THEIR DEATH A GREAT DEAL EASIER AS WE KNOW IT IS NOT THE END FOR THEM. THEREFORE IT SERVES THE SOCIAL GOOD AND SHOULD NOT BE RIDICULED.
Atheists,
but you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH... therefore you FAIL... (Remember the ANTIDOTE TO DEATH!)
the Death of Ath*ism
*********************************
REMEMBER THE DEATH TRAP!
**********************************
THE REAL QUESTION:
DOES ATHEISM HAVE A FUTURE?
AND THE ANSWER - NO!
Atheists,
GET OUT OF MY UNIVERSE
you little liars do nothing but antagonize…
and you try to eliminate all the dreams and hopes of humanity…
but you LOST…
Of course, people are still willing to place their faith in simple, simplistic explanations, like the new religions of #FAKENEWS, MAGA, and Brexit, but as our factual understanding of the world around us progresses the ability of indocrinated religious observances and belief to inform us about the world and how we might live well within it withers like a leaf in autumn.
Religion's final, fatal winter is coming, and the inevitable religious dieback will not be troubled by another spring.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- laklak
- Posts: 21022
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I'd like to think that, but it's more likely some new religion will pop up. It has always been thus. We atheists are only minutes from the stake and pyre. THis is why I stay heavily armed.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
- Brian Peacock
- Tipping cows since 1946
- Posts: 39996
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
- About me: Ablate me:
- Location: Location: Location:
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Yep, this is why I rarely sober up.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.
Details on how to do that can be found here.
.
"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."
Frank Zappa
"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
- Scot Dutchy
- Posts: 19000
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:07 pm
- About me: Dijkbeschermer
- Location: 's-Gravenhage, Nederland
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Religion is disappearing as fast as snow on a dyke in march. The church next door had a service today. It was pissing down. Five managed to make it.
"Wat is het een gezellig boel hier".
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I wonder which religion Mr SU actually subscribes to. Presumably all the rest are wrong. He should be on their discussion forums threatening fire and damnation if he's going to be even handed with his mental rage, surely?
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41057
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
Should there be a god, that's consistent with the preachings of NT, it would certainly forgive misguided and non malicious atheists for having lived under mistaken misbeliefs... of course, we have constant proof that if there is a god that created the world, that god was an evil bastard... at any rate, god or no god, there is no being deserving of worship around there.superuniverse wrote:
If anyone set off the fire alarm it was you folks...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Scientific Proof Of God
I think this is one of the strongest positions an atheist can take in the face of rabid religionists. If one has reached the conclusions one has about the lack of evidence for a deity in keeping with one's conscience, one's intellect (god given as they might see it) then not only would it be impossible to force oneself to believe something one does not, but it would also be hypocritical to, assuming it could somehow be managed.
A little like Pascal's wager - if you turned up at the Pearly Gates and were asked about your hypocritical position one would be in a sticky position!
A little like Pascal's wager - if you turned up at the Pearly Gates and were asked about your hypocritical position one would be in a sticky position!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests