objectivism for the masses

Post Reply
User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

objectivism for the masses

Post by cronus » Sun Nov 05, 2017 7:07 am

:tea:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74163
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by JimC » Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:02 am

I find a lot to object in this thread...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41043
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Svartalf » Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:57 am

the masses are objectively trumpian, fuck the morons.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39959
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Brian Peacock » Sun Nov 05, 2017 10:51 am

Objectivism: The justification for scratching your itch with someone else's hand.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Forty Two » Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:30 pm

Objectivism:

a. reality exists independently of consciousness;
b. human beings have direct contact with reality through sense perception;
c. one can attain objective knowledge from perception through the process of concept formation and inductive logic;
d. the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness (rational self-interest);
e. the only social system consistent with this morality is one that displays full respect for individual rights embodied in laissez-faire capitalism, and
f. the role of art in human life is to transform humans' metaphysical ideas by selective reproduction of reality into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and to which one can respond emotionally.

"Objectivism" derives from the idea that human knowledge and values are objective: they exist and are determined by the nature of reality, to be discovered by one's mind, and are not created by the thoughts one has.

It's metaphysics is objective reality based on the three axioms (existence, consciousness and identity) - it's epistemology (how we know what we know) is reason. Ethics is self-interest. Politics is individualism. Aesthetics is metaphysical value judgment.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39959
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Brian Peacock » Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:38 pm

How are d, e, and f contingent on a, b, and c?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74163
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by JimC » Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:44 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:How are d, e, and f contingent on a, b, and c?
Yes, I was thinking the same. the first 3 are a reasonable fit with a viewpoint of scientific materialism, the rest seem to be political add-ons...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Forty Two » Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:21 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:How are d, e, and f contingent on a, b, and c?
I don't think they are or are supposed to be. The lettering is mine, and is offered merely as a basic statement of the pillars of objectivist philosophy.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39959
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Brian Peacock » Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:25 pm

The lettering might be yours, though the wording is Wikipedia's, but does it stand as a philosophical doctrine or a political manifesto?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Forty Two » Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:45 pm

JimC wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:How are d, e, and f contingent on a, b, and c?
Yes, I was thinking the same. the first 3 are a reasonable fit with a viewpoint of scientific materialism, the rest seem to be political add-ons...
They don't stem from the first three, but they stem from the cardinal values of objectivist thought. Which are Reason, Purpose, and Self. Reason, because it is the means of gaining knowledge, and, through production, our means of survival. Purpose, because each of us has free will and must direct himself toward chosen goals, through a chosen course of life. Self, because without self-esteem, a self-motivating being cannot find the means to continue.

I'm trying to find a good summary of the connection from premises/first principles to the rational self-interest bit, but I think it can be pulled from Virtue of Selfishness. Rand and Peikoff do make the connection, though.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: objectivism for the masses

Post by Forty Two » Tue Nov 07, 2017 6:47 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:The lettering might be yours, though the wording is Wikipedia's, but does it stand as a philosophical doctrine or a political manifesto?
They are the pillars of objectivist philosophy, and its politics are a pillar. The entirety is not a political manifesto, but there is a politics to it, just as there is a morality, epistemology, etc.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests