Race realism is a flawed perspective

[rainbow]

what's 'race realism' in the first place?

Generally put, ...

...those that rely on generalisations are intellectually weak, and not worth the effort in engaging in any serious discussion.

[Drewish]

dunno, African children adopted from early life into middle or upper class first world environments tend to have just as high IQs as native whites and to succeed just as well into university level professions.

It's true that black babies adopted by affluent white families outperformed blacks raised by their biological parents. Howver, they most definitely did not do as well as the white children in those families.

http://www.kjplanet.com/amp-31-10-726.pdf

[Rum]

dunno, African children adopted from early life into middle or upper class first world environments tend to have just as high IQs as native whites and to succeed just as well into university level professions.

It's true that black babies adopted by affluent white families outperformed blacks raised by their biological parents. Howver, they most definitely did not do as well as the white children in those families.

http://www.kjplanet.com/amp-31-10-726.pdf

Your point being you self identified fascist scumbag?

[Hermit]

dunno, African children adopted from early life into middle or upper class first world environments tend to have just as high IQs as native whites and to succeed just as well into university level professions.

It's true that black babies adopted by affluent white families outperformed blacks raised by their biological parents. Howver, they most definitely did not do as well as the white children in those families.

http://www.kjplanet.com/amp-31-10-726.pdf

Keep in mind that family is not the sum total of one's social upbringing. Black babies adopted by affluent white families are still treated like blacks, though not to the extent to which black babies who are not raised by white families are. If discrimination, subtle or not, resulting in different behaviour and performance can happen on the basis of eye colour, how much easier would it be when one's entire skin is of a distinctly different colour?

[Drewish]

Rum, if you really feel that in trolling, mentally ill, or any of the other dismissals you are throwing my way, then why bother to engage with me? I've made it very clear that I don't value your opinion. I don't think you're capable of having these sort of discussions. Now maybe that limitation is self inposed based on ideology. I don't know. The point being that you're not making any effort to contribute meaningfully, so all you're doing is signaling that I'm getting under your skin. It serves no purpose to do as you are because anyone not already in firm agreement with you will see it as jst that. If you really want to "beat" me, all you have to do is raise valid points against my argument(s). The thing is, I haven't even made any arguments in this thread yet. All I've done is signal my opposition to race realism and asked if anyone is up for arguing the other side. You're slipping into some clear tribalistic thought patterns, and you'd do well (for the sake of making your case better) to do a bit less firing from the hip

[pErvinalia]

dunno, African children adopted from early life into middle or upper class first world environments tend to have just as high IQs as native whites and to succeed just as well into university level professions.

It's true that black babies adopted by affluent white families outperformed blacks raised by their biological parents. Howver, they most definitely did not do as well as the white children in those families.

http://www.kjplanet.com/amp-31-10-726.pdf

Your point being you self identified fascist scumbag?

I love it when you snap, Rum. I know exactly how it feels.

[pErvinalia]

Rum, if you really feel that in trolling, mentally ill, or any of the other dismissals you are throwing my way, then why bother to engage with me? I've made it very clear that I don't value your opinion. I don't think you're capable of having these sort of discussions. Now maybe that limitation is self inposed based on ideology. I don't know. The point being that you're not making any effort to contribute meaningfully, so all you're doing is signaling that I'm getting under your skin. It serves no purpose to do as you are because anyone not already in firm agreement with you will see it as jst that. If you really want to "beat" me, all you have to do is raise valid points against my argument(s). The thing is, I haven't even made any arguments in this thread yet. All I've done is signal my opposition to race realism and asked if anyone is up for arguing the other side. You're slipping into some clear tribalistic thought patterns, and you'd do well (for the sake of making your case better) to do a bit less firing from the hip

The mistake you make is to think that you are entitled to some sort of automatic respect, despite the vile statements you make. To say "it serves no purpose" is to assume that you rise to the level of being treated with enough respect to warrant purposeful attention. You don't. You deserve ridicule for your backward beliefs. It never ceases to amaze me how people like you, and a couple of others who have frequented this place in the past and present, think you have something to contribute to meaningful debate, when what's really going on is little more that base hate and fear of difference. I'd suggest you fuck off back to your hole, or get treated like the waste of air that you are.

[Rum]

Rum, if you really feel that in trolling, mentally ill, or any of the other dismissals you are throwing my way, then why bother to engage with me? I've made it very clear that I don't value your opinion. I don't think you're capable of having these sort of discussions. Now maybe that limitation is self inposed based on ideology. I don't know. The point being that you're not making any effort to contribute meaningfully, so all you're doing is signaling that I'm getting under your skin. It serves no purpose to do as you are because anyone not already in firm agreement with you will see it as jst that. If you really want to "beat" me, all you have to do is raise valid points against my argument(s). The thing is, I haven't even made any arguments in this thread yet. All I've done is signal my opposition to race realism and asked if anyone is up for arguing the other side. You're slipping into some clear tribalistic thought patterns, and you'd do well (for the sake of making your case better) to do a bit less firing from the hip

I don't know what you think you can possibly achieve by turning up here, posting what you know are controversial and combative opinions, laying out your fascist stall for all to see in all its bleak self interested filth.

I have no desire to 'engage' with your opinions, to argue with you or to take your views seriously. If you say you are a fascist then you are my enemy and frankly I feel nothing but hatred for you.

To argue with you gives your disgusting ideas some sort of credibility or credence. I am happy to hound you to the verge of getting myself banned but I know history tells me your kind should be treated with contempt, not rational discourse.

If you really are a fascist then you stand for everything I hate and I will treat you accordingly you nasty piece of work.

[pErvinalia]

Rum, if you really feel that in trolling, mentally ill, or any of the other dismissals you are throwing my way, then why bother to engage with me? I've made it very clear that I don't value your opinion. I don't think you're capable of having these sort of discussions. Now maybe that limitation is self inposed based on ideology. I don't know. The point being that you're not making any effort to contribute meaningfully, so all you're doing is signaling that I'm getting under your skin. It serves no purpose to do as you are because anyone not already in firm agreement with you will see it as jst that. If you really want to "beat" me, all you have to do is raise valid points against my argument(s). The thing is, I haven't even made any arguments in this thread yet. All I've done is signal my opposition to race realism and asked if anyone is up for arguing the other side. You're slipping into some clear tribalistic thought patterns, and you'd do well (for the sake of making your case better) to do a bit less firing from the hip

I don't know what you think you can possibly achieve by turning up here, posting what you know are controversial and combative opinions, laying out your fascist stall for all to see in all its bleak self interested filth.

I have no desire to 'engage' with your opinions, to argue with you or to take your views seriously. If you say you are a fascist then you are my enemy and frankly I feel nothing but hatred for you.

To argue with you gives your disgusting ideas some sort of credibility or credence. I am happy to hound you to the verge of getting myself banned but I know history tells me your kind should be treated with contempt, not rational discourse.

If you really are a fascist then you stand for everything I hate and I will treat you accordingly you nasty piece of work.

[Brian Peacock]

[Race Realism] is the racist equivalent of the banana having been created to fit the hand.

[laklak]

Black people are good dancers - fact.

Mexicans make better refried beans than anybody else - fact.

White people make good mass shooters - fact.

Chinese people eat dogs - fact.


Am I doing race realism correctly?

[pErvinalia]

Asians are shit drivers. I don't care whether the explanation is genetics, environment, or rice fungus. It's a goddamn fact!

[Brian Peacock]

I would have given lak 10/10 but he forgot...

Every Russian is an alcoholic.

[pErvinalia]

And every Floridian is a face eating meth addict.

[Rum]

..not to forget that every Frenchman is a cheese eating surrender monkey.