Incitement

[mistermack]

I don't need thin women to wear revealing clothes and bend over to think about rape. Slightly chubby women are far more tempting. And the more they cover it up, the more tempting it is to rip it off.

What WOULD put me off, is thin women who wore sexy gear and talked dirty.

[laklak]

A mate of mine says that the best women are just chubby enough that they look like a tick about to fall off a hound dog.

[Brian Peacock]

Trigger Warning!!!1! :

[Scot Dutchy]

Sorry not my cup of tea.

[Brian Peacock]

Don't knock it till you've tried it. Once you've had fat you never go back.

[Scot Dutchy]

I did once. I have tried all extremes actually but fatties did nothing for me.

[Brian Peacock]

Thinist enabler.

[Scot Dutchy]

Well...

[Forty Two]

You know, brain size is not all, Anatole France, one of the greatest French writers of the late XIX and early XXth centuries, Nobel Prize for Literature 1921, is famous among anatomists for having had a tiny brain.

Yeah, it isn't the size of the cannon but the force of the shot.

Of course, force is, in part, dependent on mass, so...

Nope, put enough pwoder in a long enough small bore gun, and you'll get the equivalent of a larger bore shot

What do you mean, "nope?" Um, F=MA. Obviously, you can increase F by increasing either M or A, but in any case F is always dependent, in part, on mass.

[Forty Two]

You know, brain size is not all, Anatole France, one of the greatest French writers of the late XIX and early XXth centuries, Nobel Prize for Literature 1921, is famous among anatomists for having had a tiny brain.

Yeah, it isn't the size of the cannon but the force of the shot.

Of course, force is, in part, dependent on mass, so...

Incorrect. It is acceleration that is proportional to total applied force, and additionally, inversely proportional to mass. Do keep up with Newton's Laws...

F=MA. If M is 2 kg and A is 3 m/s/s, then F=6kgms2

If M increases to 3, then F is 9kgms2

If M reduces to 1, then F is 3 kgms2

F is always IN PART dependent on M.

I'm not incorrect.

[Galaxian]

Yves Saint Laurent is under fire for its display of thin models and women bent over or with legs parted. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... odels.html
Most of the complaints, says the article, are folks claiming the ad campaign is an "incitement" to rape.
This is a big problem when we start prohibiting "incitements" where the person publishing something or saying something doesn't actually call for the action claimed to be incited. People seem to be claiming that suggestive or sexual images of women are incitements to rape. If that wasn't coming from the left, it would be laughed off as ridiculous.
If it's a conservative religious person saying that suggestive imagery makes men want to rape, then most people would say - that's the man's problem - he needs to control himself. Women can be as suggestive as they want. Have it come from the left, however, and women are oppressed, marginalized people and suggestive posings are incitements to rape and part of rape culture.

These are the same people who want girls & women in head to toe burqas/niqab. You see, that protects them from sexual exploitation and stops the heterosexual males from having illicit desires.
"France's leading women's group, Osez le feminisme ('Dare to be Feminist'), called for the campaign to be pulled, saying this was not the first time Saint Laurent has crossed the line." This same group that is in league with Saudi Arabia's religious police and supports the Wahabi/Salafi despotism. Yet, the MSM presstitutes never pull them up about their incitement to have all girls be accompanied by chaperones.
There is already a mass exit of boys & men from the sexual arena. It is called SEXODUS, look it up. Look up the comments of the disaffected. The main cause of it being that boys & men are easily & frequently accused of rape, pseudo-rape, or assault of one kind or another. So the guys feel threatened and simply retire from any emotional engagement with those of the opposite sex.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwPFnvniA7w


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idXcRIa1Apo


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3NDeyR_1-U


Pseudo intellectual retards have lots to answer for. But it doesn't matter. Only 19 years left...

[JimC]

You know, brain size is not all, Anatole France, one of the greatest French writers of the late XIX and early XXth centuries, Nobel Prize for Literature 1921, is famous among anatomists for having had a tiny brain.

Yeah, it isn't the size of the cannon but the force of the shot.

Of course, force is, in part, dependent on mass, so...

Incorrect. It is acceleration that is proportional to total applied force, and additionally, inversely proportional to mass. Do keep up with Newton's Laws...

F=MA. If M is 2 kg and A is 3 m/s/s, then F=6kgms2

If M increases to 3, then F is 9kgms2

If M reduces to 1, then F is 3 kgms2

F is always IN PART dependent on M.

I'm not incorrect.

You have no fucking idea. The magnitude of the acceleration is an effect of two independent causes, mass (inversely) and force (directly). Your artificial example simply forces acceleration to be a constant by fiat.

[Woodbutcher]

Forty Two must be thinking of nuclear physics. There F = mcc, where c squared is a constant. Therefore the force varies with mass only.

[JimC]

Forty Two must be thinking of nuclear physics. There F = mcc, where c squared is a constant. Therefore the force varies with mass only.

It's actually E = mc2, where E is the energy released when a mass m is converted into energy. Even then, the fact that c is a constant does not imply causal variation, other than the obvious fact that doubling the mass defect doubles the energy released.

[Woodbutcher]

Forty Two must be thinking of nuclear physics. There F = mcc, where c squared is a constant. Therefore the force varies with mass only.

It's actually E = mc2, where E is the energy released when a mass m is converted into energy. Even then, the fact that c is a constant does not imply causal variation, other than the obvious fact that doubling the mass defect doubles the energy released.

I knew that, but that's all I could think of in his defense. From here on he's on his own...