Leftist Riot Du Jour - UC Berkeley

[pErvinalia]

"faux swing of the fist to his face"... ffs, we've dealt with this before. Another inconvenient post you ignored...

[rainbow]

There were thousands of rioters.

Where does it say that?

I think you just told a porky.

...or can't you tell the difference between peaceful protestors and rioters?

If you're trying to pretend that this is just a few bad apples that spoiled the bunch, or even more ludicrously, that it was a cabal of Trump supporters doing the violence to blame it on the "peaceful leftists" then you're fooling yourself.

No, I'm not the one pretending anything. I asked for where it said there were thousands of rioters, and you failed to come up with anything.

...so it was a lie.

The problem for you, 42, is here people are not alt-right Neanderthals, who will believe your crap.
(with some notable exceptions)

Lying won't ever improve what little credibility you might have had.

[Forty Two]

"faux swing of the fist to his face"... ffs, we've dealt with this before. Another inconvenient post you ignored...

LOL, again, coming from the person who admits he doesn't read the posts he responds to, declaring to be false.

There is a video of it. They commandeered the stage, threatened him, and the "protester" takes a swing at Milo.










Scumbag leftists.

Granted, it's likely, from the looks of it, she did not intend to hit him, but if you watch you see him move his face away from the fist, which she sticks right in his face.

Here are leftist rioters physically beating people up to protest Milo at Berkeley:

[Tero]

Rioters will have to back down as Trump rules

[Forty Two]

There were thousands of rioters.

Where does it say that?

I think you just told a porky.

...or can't you tell the difference between peaceful protestors and rioters?

If you're trying to pretend that this is just a few bad apples that spoiled the bunch, or even more ludicrously, that it was a cabal of Trump supporters doing the violence to blame it on the "peaceful leftists" then you're fooling yourself.

No, I'm not the one pretending anything. I asked for where it said there were thousands of rioters, and you failed to come up with anything.

...so it was a lie.

Oh, fuck off. For god's sake - we don't know the exact number. There were a lot. Here's a report saying the "riot" involved 3,000 to 5,000 people.

Over this past weekend, a riot involving 3,000 to 5,000 individuals near the University of California, Berkeley campus resulted in three arrests and one hospitalization

https://newsone.com/3235465/language-ma ... d-a-brawl/ - there was something like $400,000 to $500,000 in property damage, and people were injured and beaten.

These are leftist rioters. And, if you listen to the videos, you'll hear the crowd of rioters or protesters cheer on the violence.

The problem for you, 42, is here people are not alt-right Neanderthals, who will believe your crap.
(with some notable exceptions)

What "crap?" What is it that I have said that's false? The number of rioters is not the important feature here. If you want carp along about whether "all" or "some" of the protesters were rioters and which ones rioted and which ones cheered and which ones just protested -- go on with your bad self. It doesn't change the fact that these are scumbag, anti-free speech, leftist shitheads who were trying to shut down a peaceful speaker on campus.

It's clear what you and some others do - when it's leftist violence, you want to minimize it - you want to say that it's not the left, because the people that were actually violent were not really the leftists. The leftists were the peaceful ones. The rioters were some other, tiny minority, of interlopers....

Lying won't ever improve what little credibility you might have had.

As usual, you, like some others, have to make it a personal attack-fest. Fuck off. Go fuck your mother (again). And shove your smug, sanctimonious, shit-posting and insult poo-flinging up your ass.

[pErvinalia]

"faux swing of the fist to his face"... ffs, we've dealt with this before. Another inconvenient post you ignored...

LOL, again, coming from the person who admits he doesn't read the posts he responds to, declaring to be false.

There is a video of it. They commandeered the stage, threatened him, and the "protester" takes a swing at Milo.

We've had his exact same argument before. She didn't swing a punch at him. She shook her fist in his face. When someone swings a punch at you you duck or fall out of the way. He did neither of those things. Man, you really can see black when something is white. Your biases are off the fucking charts.

[Forty Two]

"faux swing of the fist to his face"... ffs, we've dealt with this before. Another inconvenient post you ignored...

LOL, again, coming from the person who admits he doesn't read the posts he responds to, declaring to be false.

There is a video of it. They commandeered the stage, threatened him, and the "protester" takes a swing at Milo.

We've had his exact same argument before. She didn't swing a punch at him. She shook her fist in his face.

She swung at him, and that's why he moves his head and cringes. It's the natural reaction when someone swings at you. If you view it differently, then fine. That's your view of it.

When someone swings a punch at you you duck or fall out of the way. He did neither of those things. Man, you really can see black when something is white. Your biases are off the fucking charts.

He cringed and moved his face to avoid it.

My biases? You're mad. You are just about the least honest, and most biased person I've had the displeasure of exchanging posts with on any forum anywhere. You lack even a modicum of objectivity, and you hardly, if ever, attempt it. You have a team, and you root for it, and you never acknowledge a fault or defect on your team. You are an Apologist, and worse than a Christian Creationist Apologist, at that. And, what's worse, you don't even see it. You seem to think you are an intelligent person who is thinking rationally, when really you proceed almost entirely on emotion and like an ideologue. Only you're not even an ideologue, because your posts betray an extreme lack of understanding of any ideology. You're more of a wannabe. Someone who doesn't understand much, but wants to be seen as having understanding. And, the way you argue is designed not to clarify and reach any understanding - but, rather to muddle and provoke.

[Brian Peacock]

Having left-leaning politics = scumbag.

[Sean Hayden]

[Forty Two]

Having left-leaning politics = scumbag.

The rioting leftists in Berkeley were scumbags. That doesn't mean anyone with any left leaning politics is a scumbag.

[Animavore]

Edit, wrong thread.

[DaveDodo007]

Having left-leaning politics = scumbag.

No. There are still a few lefties who want jobs and a fair days pay for a fair days work, there are still liberals who believe in free speech, free expression, freedom of conscience and the right of assembly. It is just that the majority of lefty/liberals are anti freedom and liberty nowadays including this site. Stop trying to use your magic words aka 'insults' and 'isms' against people who disagree with you. Every time and I mean every time the politics you support has ended up it abject failure and yet you still insist it will work this time. How?, why? Genuine question, show me a nation that follows your politics which is thriving? Show me how this would work in different countries?

[Tero]

Good thing I have time to riot now after I paid income tax and had a job 40 years. Didn't see that, Trump? You thought we just watch cable TV and read Readers Digest and go visit Walgreens.

[Brian Peacock]

Having left-leaning politics = scumbag.

The rioting leftists in Berkeley were scumbags. That doesn't mean anyone with any left leaning politics is a scumbag.

Then why not make distinction between Leftists and rioting scumbags at the outset?

[DaveDodo007]

"faux swing of the fist to his face"... ffs, we've dealt with this before. Another inconvenient post you ignored...

LOL, again, coming from the person who admits he doesn't read the posts he responds to, declaring to be false.

There is a video of it. They commandeered the stage, threatened him, and the "protester" takes a swing at Milo.

We've had his exact same argument before. She didn't swing a punch at him. She shook her fist in his face. When someone swings a punch at you you duck or fall out of the way. He did neither of those things. Man, you really can see black when something is white. Your biases are off the fucking charts.

You really are pathetic aren't you. He was expressing a different point of view. They stopped the talk and intimidated the speakers, the security that they paid for to prevent this happening were told to not interfere. The BLM stupid cunt showed his Martin Luther King jr eloquence by shouting "dump the Trump" I wonder how that worked out for him. Universities are becoming cultural Marxist indoctrination camps were diversity of opinion is not allowed. There is an obvious backlash against this which is leading to ordinary people voting for popular politicians. If you really care about your leftist opinions why do you support people who are antithetical to the values that you claim to support? Whilst giving ammunition to your opponents? It is looking like tribalism at this point.