Science is Sexist

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39933
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by Brian Peacock » Sat Sep 24, 2016 8:57 pm

What's wrong with being sexy?
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74149
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by JimC » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:16 am

Brian Peacock wrote:What's wrong with being sexy?
Exactly! I've never found that it has held me back from more intellectual pursuits... :tea:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:17 am

pErvin wrote:
Forty Two wrote:...wait wait....

That's not mainstream feminism... my friends don't think that and they say they're feminists, so this must just be one more radical, weird thing that nobody really believes....

... #notallfeminists
I think it's pretty safe to say that most feminists aren't as fucking mental as this woman.
yeah right, show me a sane feminist?
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:19 am

Brian Peacock wrote:What's wrong with being sexy?
Ask a social Justice Warrior (SJW) because they are crying about it all the time.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13758
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by rainbow » Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:20 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:What's wrong with being sexy?
Ask a social Justice Warrior (SJW) because they are crying about it all the time.
Well I for one think you look very sexy in the frilly apron, as you wash the dishes.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by Forty Two » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:27 pm

rainbow wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
pErvin wrote:
Forty Two wrote:...wait wait....

That's not mainstream feminism... my friends don't think that and they say they're feminists, so this must just be one more radical, weird thing that nobody really believes....

... #notallfeminists
I think it's pretty safe to say that most feminists aren't as fucking mental as this woman.
Are you sure....?
Yep.
As it's safe to say that you're not a typical old fart in a bucket.
LOL. Well, the feminists doing the publishing, writing, teaching and public speaking, and activism, are of the full retard variety. Perhaps the run of the mill person who thinks feminism just means "equal rights for all" doesn't agree with the published authors, activists, and prominent feminists.....
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by laklak » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:34 pm

Brian Peacock wrote:What's wrong with being sexy?
Makes finding a decent shirt difficult.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60724
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by pErvinalia » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:40 pm

Forty Two wrote:
rainbow wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
pErvin wrote:
Forty Two wrote:...wait wait....

That's not mainstream feminism... my friends don't think that and they say they're feminists, so this must just be one more radical, weird thing that nobody really believes....

... #notallfeminists
I think it's pretty safe to say that most feminists aren't as fucking mental as this woman.
Are you sure....?
Yep.
As it's safe to say that you're not a typical old fart in a bucket.
LOL. Well, the feminists doing the publishing, writing, teaching and public speaking, and activism, are of the full retard variety.
All of them? Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence.... :coffee:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by Forty Two » Mon Sep 26, 2016 3:46 pm

pErvin wrote:
All of them? Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence.... :coffee:
I've already gone through this by citing to the folks, for example, in the OP, who are professors and activists. I've previously cited to folks writing for respected publications like the Guardian. Professors at major universities. Prominent activists invited to speak at the United Nations and hired by Google as their diversity consultants, and such.

"All?" We've also been over this many times - there is no (or hardly any - certainly none that I know of) idea or belief that is held by "all" of any group. That doesn't mean we can't talk about philosophies, religions, "-isms" and other ideas and have a consensus on what the basic principles of ideas and isms are. There is meaning to these words. The fact that "not all" of the folks subscribe to all of the same precepts does not mean that the words are meaningless.

"All of them" is not my claim.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39933
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by Brian Peacock » Mon Sep 26, 2016 9:14 pm

laklak wrote:
Brian Peacock wrote:What's wrong with being sexy?
Makes finding a decent shirt difficult.
Just stock up on polyester Hawaiian shirts, they never go out of style.

Image
I rest my case. :tea:
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60724
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:04 am

Forty Two wrote:
pErvin wrote:
All of them? Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence.... :coffee:
I've already gone through this by citing to the folks, for example, in the OP, who are professors and activists. I've previously cited to folks writing for respected publications like the Guardian. Professors at major universities. Prominent activists invited to speak at the United Nations and hired by Google as their diversity consultants, and such.

"All?" We've also been over this many times - there is no (or hardly any - certainly none that I know of) idea or belief that is held by "all" of any group. That doesn't mean we can't talk about philosophies, religions, "-isms" and other ideas and have a consensus on what the basic principles of ideas and isms are. There is meaning to these words. The fact that "not all" of the folks subscribe to all of the same precepts does not mean that the words are meaningless.

"All of them" is not my claim.
There is meaning to words. When you say "the feminists" you are necessarily talking about all of them. You need to learn to use language properly if you want to avoid these issues.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74149
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by JimC » Tue Sep 27, 2016 1:34 am

One of the issues here is media exposure. If there are a whole variety of feminists writing stuff, you can be sure the media will prominently and preferentially display the wackiest and weirdest. These then will be pounced on by the likes of 42 as evidence...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41035
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by Svartalf » Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:43 am

reasonableness doesn't make for good copy
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74149
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by JimC » Tue Sep 27, 2016 2:58 am

Svartalf wrote:reasonableness doesn't make for good copy
Exactly
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13758
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: Science is Sexist

Post by rainbow » Tue Sep 27, 2016 7:05 am

Back to topic. I've attended and presented at a number of scientific conferences this year. At one, I was asked to mark the presentations of the post-grad students' works, and the highest marks were taken by women.

Why?
I'd say it was because they 'generally' work more meticulously and with greater precision.

Just my opinion of course.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests