Who will replace Hillary Clinton on the Democrat ticket?

[Forty Two]

Tim Keane can move to the front of the ticket, or they can pick someone else. If they pick someone else, Keane remains the VP nominee.

Could be Sanders, but not necessarily.

I believe the decision would fall to the Democratic National Committee to make a decision behind closed doors.

[laklak]

Al Sharpton.

[mistermack]

Michelle Obama.

She would walk it against Trump.

[L'Emmerdeur]

Michelle Obama.

She would walk it against Trump.

You're going to give poor ol' Forty Two nightmares.

[Forty Two]

Interesting candidate, but I don't know that she's expressed any interest in it. More than likely, it would be Sanders or Keane.

How do you not give it to Sanders? He at least campaigned and got the second most votes in the primaries. What would be the rationale for picking someone off the street?

[Forty Two]

I bet the Democrats are of the mind that if it's going to happen, it's got to happen almost immediately.

Cokie Roberts of NPR is talking about the internal Democrat whispers about replacement.... http://freebeacon.com/politics/roberts- ... side-race/

Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders have been mentioned. They're both older than Hillary, though.

Bill Clinton was seen politicking for his wife, urging Democratic officials to stick with Hillary, so that he could get at least four more years of White House interns to harass.

[tattuchu]

Did I miss something? Did Hillary kick the bucket or summat?

[Svartalf]

she's ill and her ability to withstand the job of being president is highly questioned

[Rum]

There's a long history of sick presidents.

[mistermack]

George W was healthy.

And look what a great job he did.

[JimC]

But is she fully sick?

[Brian Peacock]

Taylor Swift?

[Tero]

She has to be sworn in, then drop dead. Otherwise too messy. Will take all kinds of judges and senators and electoral colleges.

[laklak]

Taylor Swift?

I know me. I'd do her.

[cronus]

Presidents in the old days had no real time pressures, could spend plenty of time playing golf. Now the function of any world leader of merit is very skilled and very stressful, requiring perpetual preparedness for anything that might arise on both a national and international level. Neither Trump or Clinton are up to the job of being the primary world leader in these uncertain times in my opinion. This is not a good moment to elect inadequate candidates to lead the free world. Something has gone very wrong with the political system in the US for it to come this choice from a educated forward nation of hundreds of millions.