Snipers shoot 12 cops, kill 5, at Black Lives Matter Protest

[pErvinalia]

[JimC]

Seth, the moderation team has zero interest in your proclamations of what is or what is not a personal attack.

Simple as that.

[Seth]

Seth, the moderation team has zero interest in your proclamations of what is or what is not a personal attack.

Simple as that.

And I have zero interest in anything you have to say about it. I know you don't want to hear the truth because it's inconvenient to you, but that's just too bad. There's nothing in the FUA about it being forbidden to discuss the definition of "personal attack." Just because it embarrasses you doesn't mean it's wrong.

[JimC]

Rant about it to your heart's content, just don't expect your words to matter in the slightest...

[pErvinalia]

Seth, the moderation team has zero interest in your proclamations of what is or what is not a personal attack.

Simple as that.

And I have zero interest in anything you have to say about it. I know you don't want to hear the truth because it's inconvenient to you, but that's just too bad. There's nothing in the FUA about it being forbidden to discuss the definition of "personal attack." Just because it embarrasses you doesn't mean it's wrong.

It embarrasses you, champ, because you know very well that there is a distinction in the rules between calling someone a liar and saying they are lying about something. This has been the case in all the preceding fora, and it is still the case here. And you know this. So one can only assume you are trolling the mods again.

[Scot Dutchy]

Never changes

[Seth]

Rant about it to your heart's content, just don't expect your words to matter in the slightest...

I don't, but that is the product of your actions, not my opinions.

[Seth]

Seth, the moderation team has zero interest in your proclamations of what is or what is not a personal attack.

Simple as that.

And I have zero interest in anything you have to say about it. I know you don't want to hear the truth because it's inconvenient to you, but that's just too bad. There's nothing in the FUA about it being forbidden to discuss the definition of "personal attack." Just because it embarrasses you doesn't mean it's wrong.

It embarrasses you, champ, because you know very well that there is a distinction in the rules between calling someone a liar and saying they are lying about something. This has been the case in all the preceding fora, and it is still the case here. And you know this. So one can only assume you are trolling the mods again.

Er, it's not the fact that you implied I was lying about something that constitutes the offense, it's WHAT you were impugning and your INTENTIONS in making the comment that count. As I said before, if you accuse me of lying about something we are discussing in a debate that's one thing, but when you accuse me of lying about my career as a police officer and then you deliberately and intentionally demean and insult me by opining that I was actually something less than what I've stated I was, for the purposes of intentionally personally insulting and attacking me, which is absolutely clearly what you were doing. THAT is what makes it a "personal attack." It doesn't matter if you are lying or telling the truth, what matters is that your intent was to insult and disparage me, and that is amply demonstrated by the fact that your personal attack had nothing whatever to do with the discussion and everything to do with my reputation, which you impugned and insulted.

And if the mods are trolled by these essential truths, then it's because they know they are wrong and refuse to admit it and do what they should do, which is to suspend you for at least a month.

You know it, I know it, and the mods know it, but they are unwilling to reverse themselves and do their jobs because they don't like me. If I did the same thing to you, I'd be suspended in a heartbeat by JimC, and you know it.

[Tyrannical]

Don't worry Seth, I hacked JimC's account. I even got him calling for the execution of Islamic terrorists and those that help them

He set his password to gin.

[pErvinalia]

It's because you are not a Marxist. Which reminds me, it's lucky we are all avowed Marxists or one could say you are purposely impugning our characters by calling us all Marxists.

[Seth]

Don't worry Seth, I hacked JimC's account. I even got him calling for the execution of Islamic terrorists and those that help them

He set his password to gin.

Can you hack it and suspend him for a month?

[Seth]

It's because you are not a Marxist. Which reminds me, it's lucky we are all avowed Marxists or one could say you are purposely impugnibg our characters by calling us all Marxists.

I didn't call you a Marxist, I said that every argument you make screams "Marxism!" That is clearly directed towards your arguments, not your person. And then I refer to the abstract group "Marxists" and condemn them for their evil behaviors. I leave it up to you and the readers to infer whatever they like about your actual political affiliations. You deny being a Marxist and I choose not to speculate on the honesty of this claim and accept it at face value.

I was quite careful about making that distinction precisely because calling you a Marxist would be a personal attack for exactly the reason you state. Which is why your personal attack on me is worth of sanction. Thanks for backing me up on this.

[Tyrannical]

Don't worry Seth, I hacked JimC's account. I even got him calling for the execution of Islamic terrorists and those that help them

He set his password to gin.

Can you hack it and suspend him for a month?

I actually like JimC. He's slowly coming around to see the error in his ways, as are several other people. They just aren't at the point where they can admit their error, but their posts tell the story.

[pErvinalia]

Seth, the moderation team has zero interest in your proclamations of what is or what is not a personal attack.

Simple as that.

And I have zero interest in anything you have to say about it. I know you don't want to hear the truth because it's inconvenient to you, but that's just too bad. There's nothing in the FUA about it being forbidden to discuss the definition of "personal attack." Just because it embarrasses you doesn't mean it's wrong.

It embarrasses you, champ, because you know very well that there is a distinction in the rules between calling someone a liar and saying they are lying about something. This has been the case in all the preceding fora, and it is still the case here. And you know this. So one can only assume you are trolling the mods again.

Er, it's not the fact that you implied I was lying about something that constitutes the offense,

Moving the goal posts it seems:

Annnnd there's yet another direct personal attack calling me a liar.

Hey Mods, are you gonna do anything about it?

[pErvinalia]

It's because you are not a Marxist. Which reminds me, it's lucky we are all avowed Marxists or one could say you are purposely impugnibg our characters by calling us all Marxists.

I didn't call you a Marxist,

You seem to have no shame in lying, do you? :

Therefore, I think it's more likely you're a dyed-in-the-wool Marxist who is simply dissembling about not being a Marxist, because the Second Rule of Marxism is "Deny you are a Marxist."

Get it?