Labour MP killed after being stabbed and shot in the street

[Meekychuppet]

Do you consider Seth's bollocks as a dissenting opinion?

A good deal moreso than I consider the likes of you worthy to tell me that it isn't.

Weird.

Why? What is it that you are so scared of hearing that leads you to declare everything he says worthless?

[Scot Dutchy]

Do you consider Seth's bollocks as a dissenting opinion?

A good deal moreso than I consider the likes of you worthy to tell me that it isn't.

Weird.

Why? What is it that you are so scared of hearing that leads you to declare everything he says worthless?

Scared? Really this is like Alice in Wonderland.

[pErvinalia]

Yeah. Meeky is the king of straw.

[Hermit]

You ever gonna answer my other question? Or is running away your final answer?

Your memory is even worse than your grammar. Refresh it here.

[Scot Dutchy]

Well he is king of something.

[Meekychuppet]

Scared? Really this is like Alice in Wonderland.

I think he's pretty much a plantpot myself, but I don't need to do what you do. If he's so self-evidently wrong then why do you constantly belittle and attack him?

[Meekychuppet]

You ever gonna answer my other question? Or is running away your final answer?

Your memory is even worse than your grammar. Refresh it here.

I did answer, explaining that I'm not transcribing the video for you.

[NineBerry]

[Galaxian]

Galaxian sees a conspiracy in opening a litre of milk.

Almost, but not quite. It should be evident by now that ANY important news item should be questioned as possibly/probably fraudulent and/or propaganda.

If the news says that there was a car chase on 1st street, or that a couple of kids drowned in the canal, OK, probably so.

It's the old adage that, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Trivia about a car chase or kids drowning are not world shattering events. 9/11 is, the Paris rock concert shooting is, Orlando is. So they MUST be treated with great suspicion. Halfway there is the Jo Cox MP murder.

When I was a child I believed that 90% of important things that we were told, for example on the news, was true and that the remaining 10% was in error only by accident. Now that I have lived too long and seen too much, I realize that 90% of important things that we are fed on the news is lies & deceit, and only 10% may be true, and that only because it happens to coincide with the official agenda & strategy.

You lot would do well to follow that example. You will see plain evidence, in your face, that you were blind to before. Glaring examples of fraud & control, that you'd kick yourselves for not recognizing before.

Here's a movie about your predicament:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwqa1mCt3tM


But 'cognitive dissonance' is a powerful drug. "The truth will set you free", but ONLY if you are humble, sincere & open minded

[Meekychuppet]

Galaxian sees a conspiracy in opening a litre of milk.

Almost, but not quite. It should be evident by now that ANY important news item should be questioned as possibly/probably fraudulent and/or propaganda.

If the news says that there was a car chase on 1st street, or that a couple of kids drowned in the canal, OK, probably so.

It's the old adage that, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Trivia about a car chase or kids drowning are not world shattering events. 9/11 is, the Paris rock concert shooting is, Orlando is. So they MUST be treated with great suspicion. Halfway there is the Jo Cox MP murder.

When I was a child I believed that 90% of important things that we were told, for example on the news, was true and that the remaining 10% was in error only by accident. Now that I have lived too long and seen too much, I realize that 90% of important things that we are fed on the news is lies & deceit, and only 10% may be true, and that only because it happens to coincide with the official agenda & strategy.

You lot would do well to follow that example. You will see plain evidence, in your face, that you were blind to before. Glaring examples of fraud & control, that you'd kick yourselves for not recognizing before.

Here's a movie about your predicament:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwqa1mCt3tM


But 'cognitive dissonance' is a powerful drug. "The truth will set you free", but ONLY if you are humble, sincere & open minded

That's my favourite film, but come off it. It's not a documentary.

[Scot Dutchy]

Scared? Really this is like Alice in Wonderland.[/qoute]


I think he's pretty much a plantpot myself, but I don't need to do what you do. If he's so self-evidently wrong then why do you constantly belittle and attack him?

He makes stupid statements to which he gets stupid replies. This is a guy who does not believe in taxation never mind public services. If you want a road you build it and hope that your neighbours road meets yours. Wasted hours and hours trying to discuss even the basics of a working society. Never mind health care and education. All of a sudden I have to take him seriously?

[pErvinalia]

Scared? Really this is like Alice in Wonderland.

I think he's pretty much a plantpot myself, but I don't need to do what you do. If he's so self-evidently wrong then why do you constantly belittle and attack him?

Because he deserves it.

[Meekychuppet]

Scared? Really this is like Alice in Wonderland.[/qoute]


I think he's pretty much a plantpot myself, but I don't need to do what you do. If he's so self-evidently wrong then why do you constantly belittle and attack him?

He makes stupid statements to which he gets stupid replies. This is a guy who does not believe in taxation never mind public services. If you want a road you build it and hope that your neighbours road meets yours. Wasted hours and hours trying to discuss even the basics of a working society. Never mind health care and education. All of a sudden I have to take him seriously?

You do take him seriously. If you didn't you wouldn't respond as though he were a threat. I'm pretty sure you don't yell at the homeless or whatever since they're no threat to you, so if he is so absurd why are you talking to him?

[rainbow]

You do take him seriously. If you didn't you wouldn't respond as though he were a threat. I'm pretty sure you don't yell at the homeless or whatever since they're no threat to you, so if he is so absurd why are you talking to him?

I find you totally absurd, yet I still respond to your postings.

...just saying.

[pErvinalia]

Scared? Really this is like Alice in Wonderland.[/qoute]


I think he's pretty much a plantpot myself, but I don't need to do what you do. If he's so self-evidently wrong then why do you constantly belittle and attack him?

He makes stupid statements to which he gets stupid replies. This is a guy who does not believe in taxation never mind public services. If you want a road you build it and hope that your neighbours road meets yours. Wasted hours and hours trying to discuss even the basics of a working society. Never mind health care and education. All of a sudden I have to take him seriously?

You do take him seriously. If you didn't you wouldn't respond as though he were a threat. I'm pretty sure you don't yell at the homeless or whatever since they're no threat to you, so if he is so absurd why are you talking to him?

Because the ideas he (and others) promulgate are very dangerous to modern civilised liberal democracy. A homeless person isn't.

Having said that, I pretty much ignore him these days. His "arguments" have become so addled that I doubt many people could take them seriously.