Jian Ghomeshi trial

[pErvinalia]

You are just getting more and more incoherent. What "fact" am I supposed to be looking up? You refuse to educate me on any alleged facts. As I said, I don't have a window into your mind. If you want me to look something up, state what it is. If you have a point to make, make it. Why all the juvenile theatrics? Are you terminally afraid of backing up the points you make?

[Cunt]

You are just getting more and more incoherent. What "fact" am I supposed to be looking up? You refuse to educate me on any alleged facts. As I said, I don't have a window into your mind. If you want me to look something up, state what it is. If you have a point to make, make it. Why all the juvenile theatrics? Are you terminally afraid of backing up the points you make?

No, I am enjoying that you don't understand the simplest facts about this case, but will spend ENDLESS time arguing about it anyway

Don't look anything up. You are beautiful just as you are.

[Cunt]

I'll give you another hint - though I shouldn't.

If you were interested in the subject, you would know the pertinent facts. If, however, you were more interested in scoring points for being 'right', there would be no reason to inform yourself.

[pErvinalia]

Given you are just going to troll in response to the above request, I'm just going to take a stab at what you are on about, and hopefully one of the other victimised white dudes will offer some discussion on the subject. So here goes:

The bloke wrongfully accused in this trial is the real victim. Not particularly controversial as people are accused and acquitted of crimes all the time. So I'm not sure what I am supposed to be learning about that.

Victim services: Ok, this came up in google:
"The Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) develops, coordinates, and funds victim/witness programs, sexual assault crisis centers, and programs that combat violence against women, including the V-STOP grant program and the programs funded through Virginia Sexual and Domestic Violence Victim Fund. We offer many services, training, and other resources to victim service providers, law enforcement officials, allied professionals, prosecutors, and other local government officials."

So, basically what I figured victim services would be. Surely there's nothing controversial there?

So the only thing I can think that is getting you upset is that some people who are alleged to be a victim and who turn out to not be a victim via a court decision are getting access to these services, while presumably the real victim in these cases - the wrongfully accused - is not getting any of these services. Ok. So what is the alternative? We stop providing these services to alleged victims because a small number of them turn out to not be real victims? Remember, a court ruling doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't an actual victim. It just means there isn't enough evidence to convict an alleged perpetrator. So what point exactly is this Cunt trying to make? Does anyone know?

[pErvinalia]

You are just getting more and more incoherent. What "fact" am I supposed to be looking up? You refuse to educate me on any alleged facts. As I said, I don't have a window into your mind. If you want me to look something up, state what it is. If you have a point to make, make it. Why all the juvenile theatrics? Are you terminally afraid of backing up the points you make?

No, I am enjoying that you don't understand the simplest facts about this case

I understand it fine. The point is that YOU were referring to cases plural. I can't understand something about a case that you refuse to cite.

[pErvinalia]

I'll give you another hint - though I shouldn't.

If you were interested in the subject, you would know the pertinent facts. If, however, you were more interested in scoring points for being 'right', there would be no reason to inform yourself.

There can't be right or wrong as you haven't made a single coherent argument yet.

[Cunt]

You are just getting more and more incoherent. What "fact" am I supposed to be looking up? You refuse to educate me on any alleged facts. As I said, I don't have a window into your mind. If you want me to look something up, state what it is. If you have a point to make, make it. Why all the juvenile theatrics? Are you terminally afraid of backing up the points you make?

No, I am enjoying that you don't understand the simplest facts about this case

I understand it fine. The point is that YOU were referring to cases plural. I can't understand something about a case that you refuse to cite.

I won't take the time to educate you because your ignorance on this matter is just so fucking funny.

Have you looked into this case AT ALL? No. How do I know? Because you would not be having these struggles if you were not willfully ignorant.

If I was discussing this case with anyone who was truly interested in the facts, they wouldn't be using your approach. You just want to be right! And you will! Just keep braying about your lack of understanding, rEv! It's awesome!

[Cunt]

If you want ME to teach you about the facts relating to this case, and my comments, you can either approach with respect and care, such as you would with anyone you asked to teach you something. Alternately, you can suck the corn niblets out of my ass and blame me for your ignorance.

This is me reaching out, fucker. Best offer you are likely to get from me, too.

[pErvinalia]

Ok, so you are ignoring my response to you on what I think you are trying to say. Continue your trollery, fine sir!

[pErvinalia]

You are just getting more and more incoherent. What "fact" am I supposed to be looking up? You refuse to educate me on any alleged facts. As I said, I don't have a window into your mind. If you want me to look something up, state what it is. If you have a point to make, make it. Why all the juvenile theatrics? Are you terminally afraid of backing up the points you make?

No, I am enjoying that you don't understand the simplest facts about this case

I understand it fine. The point is that YOU were referring to cases plural. I can't understand something about a case that you refuse to cite.

I won't take the time to educate you because your ignorance on this matter is just so fucking funny.

Have you looked into this case AT ALL? No.

Um, yes. I made a lengthy post just above the one you quoted.

You just want to be right!

How can I be right, when we aren't debating anything?!? You refuse to state your position.

[pErvinalia]

If you want ME to teach you about the facts relating to this case, and my comments, you can either approach with respect and care,

Guy who's been trolling almost non-stop for weeks is demanding respect.

[Cunt]

Ok, so you are ignoring my response to you on what I think you are trying to say. Continue your trollery, fine sir!

To help you, I will colour your disrespectful bits red. When I can't find any, maybe I will deign to educate you.

But I doubt it. It is too fun reading your braying.

Given you are just going to troll in response to the above request, I'm just going to take a stab at what you are on about, and hopefully one of the other victimised white dudes will offer some discussion on the subject. So here goes:

Since you lead with a complete lack of respect, don't expect to get anything better in return. You remain ignorant, by your own choice, about the most basic facts around this case.

Facts which are available to anyone with a google and a remote understanding of a legal system.

[Cunt]

If you want ME to teach you about the facts relating to this case, and my comments, you can either approach with respect and care,

Guy who's been trolling almost non-stop for weeks is demanding respect.

I'm not demanding respect from you, rEv. I wouldn't value it highly anyway.

If you want me to take time to dispel your ignorance though, you will have to ask nicely.

Or fuck yourself. I enjoy you either way.

[pErvinalia]

Ok, so you are ignoring my response to you on what I think you are trying to say. Continue your trollery, fine sir!

To help you, I will colour your disrespectful bits red. When I can't find any, maybe I will deign to educate you.

You'll be waiting a long time. Respect is earned, not given for free.

And with that, I'm off to bed. Hopefully in the meantime someone will do what you refuse to do and actually make a coherent point that can be debated.

[pErvinalia]

If you want ME to teach you about the facts relating to this case, and my comments, you can either approach with respect and care,

Guy who's been trolling almost non-stop for weeks is demanding respect.

I'm not demanding respect from you, rEv.

Um yes you are. By definition if I stop disrespecting you, like you have requested, then I am respecting you. It's a binary distinction. It's no wonder you can't make a coherent point. You seem to have a less than optimal grasp on the English language.