Problematic Stuff

[pErvinalia]

Dude, you are the one banging on about hair colour and obesity and liberal arts in place of any cogent argument. If I trolled you, you'd know all about it. In fact, do your research and you'll find that I have a short fuse regarding trolls and idiots and once I decide someone is one, I hound them mercilessly until they either fuck off the site, or I get suspended for a month.

[rachelbean]

You should comb out your feminazi hair, adjust your horn-rimmed glasses, sigh obesely, and claim I am horrible for not agreeing with you 100%

Oh, and then make false claims about my position which you can ridicule easier.

Cunt, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules. I realize you are being clever enough to continually refer to rev as an obese female feminazi without directly calling him one (just ascribing all the attributes to him in post after post), but there is a reason the personal attacks rule is followed up with play nice. Find a way to make your point without harassing other members.

[pErvinalia]

Cunt, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules.

I love how that unintentionally reads.

[Cunt]

Cunt, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules.

I love how that unintentionally reads.

Me too.

Lets both stop that shit, rEv. I don't care if I get kicked, banned or whatever, so it is only YOU who can affect the way I exchange with you.

I dare you. Be serious. Or don't, I don't really give a shit. If I can't respond the way the conversation calls for, I don't want to continue anyway.

Thanks for reminding one of us to be nice, rachelbean.

[Forty Two]

You should comb out your feminazi hair, adjust your horn-rimmed glasses, sigh obesely, and claim I am horrible for not agreeing with you 100%

Oh, and then make false claims about my position which you can ridicule easier.

Cunt, this is a reminder that personal attacks are against the rules. I realize you are being clever enough to continually refer to rev as an obese female feminazi without directly calling him one (just ascribing all the attributes to him in post after post), but there is a reason the personal attacks rule is followed up with play nice. Find a way to make your point without harassing other members.

In all fairness, rEv may well "identify" as a feminazi. We don't really know, so -- I, for one, am willing to give rEv the benefit of the doubt.

[Forty Two]

If I trolled you, you'd know all about it.

Wouldn't that be the opposite of trolling? If a troll's mark is well-aware that the troll is trolling, isn't that a complete failure on the part of the troll?

In fact, do your research and you'll find that I have a short fuse regarding trolls and idiots and once I decide someone is one, I hound them mercilessly until they either fuck off the site, or I get suspended for a month.

That doesn't really count as a point in your favor, rEv. If that's true, it really doesn't say anything nice about you as a person.

[Forty Two]

So you think 200yrs ago there were equal rights for women? Ok then.

200 years ago there wasn't equal rights for men, either.

They didn't need it as they were almost solely the decision makers in society and the family.

LOL - well, I will thank you for the admission. We are agreed. 200 years ago, there wasn't equal rights for men, either. Agreed.

[Cunt]

It is problematic that so many feminists are students of their narrow band of the humanities, and never bother learning about history, except where it supports their theories (i.e. - selective history)

[pErvinalia]

So you think 200yrs ago there were equal rights for women? Ok then.

200 years ago there wasn't equal rights for men, either.

They didn't need it as they were almost solely the decision makers in society and the family.

LOL - well, I will thank you for the admission. We are agreed. 200 years ago, there wasn't equal rights for men, either. Agreed.

Men held virtually all positions of power. You are singularly a genius at missing the point.

[pErvinalia]

It is problematic that so many feminists are students of their narrow band of the humanities, and never bother learning about history, except where it supports their theories (i.e. - selective history)

What history would that be, cunt? You haven't posted anything other than empty rhetoric all thread.

[pErvinalia]

If I trolled you, you'd know all about it.

Wouldn't that be the opposite of trolling? If a troll's mark is well-aware that the troll is trolling, isn't that a complete failure on the part of the troll?

In fact, do your research and you'll find that I have a short fuse regarding trolls and idiots and once I decide someone is one, I hound them mercilessly until they either fuck off the site, or I get suspended for a month.

That doesn't really count as a point in your favor, rEv. If that's true, it really doesn't say anything nice about you as a person.

Oh no, Coito thinks I'm not nice for treating fuckwits like fuckwits! Whatever will I do?!

[Cunt]

It is problematic that so many feminists are students of their narrow band of the humanities, and never bother learning about history, except where it supports their theories (i.e. - selective history)

What history would that be, cunt? You haven't posted anything other than empty rhetoric all thread.

If you want to be taken seriously, you are going about it wrong.

That is problematic.

If I trolled you, you'd know all about it.

Wouldn't that be the opposite of trolling? If a troll's mark is well-aware that the troll is trolling, isn't that a complete failure on the part of the troll?

In fact, do your research and you'll find that I have a short fuse regarding trolls and idiots and once I decide someone is one, I hound them mercilessly until they either fuck off the site, or I get suspended for a month.

That doesn't really count as a point in your favor, rEv. If that's true, it really doesn't say anything nice about you as a person.

Oh no, Coito thinks I'm not nice for treating fuckwits like fuckwits! Whatever will I do?!

Oh look, you like calling people names.

I wonder, if you engage willingly with fuckwits so often that it leaves you on the edge of a rage, what does that say about them, and more importantly, what does it say about you?

[pErvinalia]

What in the fuck are you on about? Are you totally incapable of posting something of substance on the thread topic?

[Forty Two]

If I trolled you, you'd know all about it.

Wouldn't that be the opposite of trolling? If a troll's mark is well-aware that the troll is trolling, isn't that a complete failure on the part of the troll?

In fact, do your research and you'll find that I have a short fuse regarding trolls and idiots and once I decide someone is one, I hound them mercilessly until they either fuck off the site, or I get suspended for a month.

That doesn't really count as a point in your favor, rEv. If that's true, it really doesn't say anything nice about you as a person.

Oh no, Coito thinks I'm not nice for treating fuckwits like fuckwits! Whatever will I do?!

That's some projection, and lack of self-awareness.....

[Forty Two]

So you think 200yrs ago there were equal rights for women? Ok then.

200 years ago there wasn't equal rights for men, either.

They didn't need it as they were almost solely the decision makers in society and the family.

LOL - well, I will thank you for the admission. We are agreed. 200 years ago, there wasn't equal rights for men, either. Agreed.

Men held virtually all positions of power. You are singularly a genius at missing the point.

Again, projection, and complete lack of self-awareness.

But, I'll bite -- what is it that you think the point is?

Evasion and obfuscation in 3, 2, 1....