Global Climate Change Science News

[Animavore]

Too late mate.
You've posted your best shot, and it was shite.
Temperatures going up a bit, and CO2 going up a bit. Highly conclusive.

Or actually no. I can't help but notice, that temperatures have gone up, roughly in line with my weight.

Jeez, it was me all the time.

I haven't even approached my best shot. I haven't even taken out any equations yet. I could give a lecture on this stuff.

You asked for evidence using only three pieces of information. I provided it. You don't accept it. That's fair enough, but let's not pretend that your denial of fact equals a refutation of fact.

[mistermack]

I know bullshit when I see it.

Keeping your best evidence secret?

That's a bit like the religions that keep the secrets for the chosen few.

You're one of the few allright.


The difference with me is that I don't CLAIM to know if MMGW is actually happening or not. I'd happily accept it if I ever come across good evidence. (which is where you let me down ).

I just give my opinion that the evidence so far is poor, and the certainty that you and others claim is just akin to religious faith.
And it makes me sad that no criticism or dissent is tolerated in the alarmist world. That's just unscientific.

[cronus]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ene ... ts-future/

We had all better hope these scientists are wrong about the planet’s future

An influential group of scientists led by James Hansen, the former NASA scientist often credited with having drawn the first major attention to climate change in 1988 congressional testimony, has published a dire climate study that suggests the impact of global warming will be quicker and more catastrophic than generally envisioned.

The research invokes collapsing ice sheets, violent megastorms and even the hurling of boulders by giant waves in its quest to suggest that even 2 degrees Celsius of global warming above pre-industrial levels would be far too much. Hansen has called it the most important work he has ever done.

The sweeping paper, 52 pages in length and with 19 authors, draws on evidence from ancient climate change or “paleo-climatology,” as well as climate experiments using computer models and some modern observations.

(continued)

[Animavore]

Huh? Which evidence am I keeping secret? What the fuck are you talking about? Who is being intolerant to your dissent? Pointing out flaws in arguments or debunking tired claims or stating the fact that the Heartland institute are proven liars is not intolerance.

You're all over the place with your arguments and come across as confused.

[Animavore]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/ene ... ts-future/

We had all better hope these scientists are wrong about the planet’s future



(continued)

Maybe they are. Will be interesting to watch this being pulled apart in the coming weeks. Most don't seem convinced.

[mistermack]

Meanwhile, it's mid march, and the temperature is typical mid-march.

Give me two degrees of warming. Please.

[Svartalf]

actually, it's late march and we have an early march flavor to the weather, that is, it's already spring and the weather is still quite wintery

[Animavore]

Climate and weather are not the same thing. FFS.

[cronus]

Climate and weather are not the same thing. FFS.

They are actually. Only they differ on details.

[Animavore]

Climate and weather are not the same thing. FFS.

They are actually. Only they differ on details.

No.

[Svartalf]

Climate and weather are not the same thing. FFS.

climate is warming up, it's been the hottest year ever in 2015, and I don't know how many times that record has been broken since 2003

[Animavore]

Climate and weather are not the same thing. FFS.

climate is warming up, it's been the hottest year ever in 2015, and I don't know how many times that record has been broken since 2003

The first two months of this year are hotter again with February smashing records. This year may beat last.13 of the hottest years on record have happened this millennium. It's warming 50 times faster than the period of warming after the last ice age and hasn't been this warm in thousands of years.

So yeah. It's getting hot and it's not natural occurrences.

[pErvinalia]

Yes, peer review is "campaigning"...

It certainly is, when all the peers are campaigners too.

But you, lets hear YOUR convincing argument for MMGW.
What single piece of EVIDENCE do you find most compelling? You've been at it long enough, so it should be a good one.

Why does it need to be a single piece of evidence?? That would be stupid. It's the whole body of work that convinces me.

[pErvinalia]

Yes, peer review is "campaigning"...

It certainly is, when all the peers are campaigners too.

But you, lets hear YOUR convincing argument for MMGW.
What single piece of EVIDENCE do you find most compelling? You've been at it long enough, so it should be a good one.

Tell you what. You show me any scientific theory which is accepted based on a single piece of evidence, and then tell me what that single piece is. And when you've figured out what's wrong with that question do, please, come back and explain it.

[pErvinalia]

Too late mate.
You've posted your best shot, and it was shite.

It actually destroyed your bullshit. Ironically, you are just full of hot air.