They are? Whether first amendment rights are more important really depends on who you're talking to.Svartalf wrote:Well, first amendment rights are more important than a supposedly 'hostile' environment... let the poor little snowflakes provide more robust evidence than people partying in blackface or with little sombreros or let them be held in contempt.Forty Two wrote:Not exactly that - but, what they are looking to do is launch a Title IX action and use the college's lack of action against students' unsavory opinions or politically incorrect parties as evidence that the school maintains an hostile education environment.Svartalf wrote:OK, so you can, presumably successfully launch title IX actions because of frat party and offensive speech? ok, I'm flabbergasted at the judges who don't dismiss quickly.
You can see regressive left social justice wingnuts who claimed that Professor Melissa Click defended the first amendment and really knew what the first amendment meant when she forcibly ejected a member of the student press from a public place by calling on "muscle" to oust him from a public demonstration. Literally. I mean it. These social justice fucking douchebags really think that shutting out the press from their demonstrations is within the first amendment, and that when a bunch of feminists or other activists group together they can claim a public space as a "female space" or a "black space" and that's what the first amendment is all about.
Social Justice Warriors are a scourge -- anyone calling themselves a progressive leftists needs to evaluate that stance again. I don't think it means what they think it means.