This is not a reply. It's a request: Would you do another ragequit, please? The last one was good, but a permanent quit would be a lot better.rEvolutionist wrote:Don't reply. I'm sick dealing with irrational arguments in this sphere. I've tried for years to get some mods to see reason, but they have no incentive to. I'm over it.
Get a dog up ya.Hermit wrote:This is not a reply. It's a request: Would you do another ragequit, please? The last one was good, but a permanent quit would be a lot better.rEvolutionist wrote:Don't reply. I'm sick dealing with irrational arguments in this sphere. I've tried for years to get some mods to see reason, but they have no incentive to. I'm over it.
Thank you.
You see, if you'd said his argument was cantankerously old goatish you'd be okay, however...rEvolutionist wrote:How about you quit, you cantankerous old goat? It would save you having to whinge anymore.
Good, wasn't it?tuco wrote:Nicely said devogue, holy ground.
Far be it from me to take the advice from a bearded, scruffy libertarian, and anyway, IrEvolutionist wrote:How about you quit, you cantankerous old goat?
Calling Hermit a cantankerous old goat just slides under the ropes.rEvolutionist wrote:How about you quit, you cantankerous old goat? It would save you having to whinge anymore.
Simply taking up your plea:rEvolutionist wrote:Calling someone's arguments idiotic isn't the same as calling a person an idiot. If it was, then you wouldn't be allowed to say it about one even post.
Don't reply. I'm sick dealing with irrational arguments in this sphere. I've tried for years to get some mods to see reason, but they have no incentive to. I'm over it.
BTW, not just JimC on a power trip, but the communication to you was agreed to by the other moderator who is currently active...rEvolutionist wrote:
...I'd only ask that the moderator(s) please give me a warning first if I am overstepping the mark...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests
