GOP Primaries/Caucuses Discussions, Jokes and Predictions

[laklak]

Why does Donald Trump wear a dead animal on his head?
No live animal would take the job.

Why did Marco Rubio cross the road?
Hang on, he crossed back over again.

What would you have if Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz spit roasted Donald Trump?
A pressed Cuban ham sandwich.

If Donald married Hillary, would the media call them Trumpery?

What's Bernie Sanders favorite bid in bridge?
One No Trump.

[Animavore]

Trump buffoonery exhibit A (and this is just today).
http://www.businessinsider.de/donald-tr ... ?r=US&IR=T

If you really need more... I mean, if you really, really need more. I mean if you seriously, really need more. I can do that. I shouldn't have to. It's pretty self-explanatory, but if you insist on beating a dead horse, then I can pick a news story from almost any day.

[tuco]

Tweet from the article:

.. and here with his sister .. alleged sister! ;)

I do not think he manages his Twitter.

[Hermit]

Here is an argument from Breitbart on points offered to support a Trump Presidency:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... rump-2016/

Other than attacking the source -- what's your response to the substantive points?

Are you seriously suggesting that a candidate for the US presidency is suitable for the job when one of his few concretely announced policies is to expel all of the 10 or 15 million Mexicans, build a 3,145 km (1,954 miles) long wall to keep them out and make Mexico pay for it? Apart from the utter absurdity of it, has Trump even spent a minute speculating about the consequences such as how the US will cope without harvesters, lawn mowers and domestic helpers?

[pErvinalia]

Buffoon? What has he done that qualifies him as that?

Seriously?! Is this going to be another of those debates? No thanks.

42 is right. Trump has no buffoon qualifications. He couln't even pass the grade

The Atheism Plus is strong with you two. Did you guys come over from Ratskep? That's their modus operandi too.

Look, it's a simple question. What do you think qualifies him as a buffoon. Maybe I agree with you.

I'm not a Trump supporter, by the way. I just like him better than Cruz or Rubio, his closest adversaries right now. Buffoon or not, I'd take him over them without any question.

Again, this is supposed to be a thread for jokes according to the title.

The title includes "Discussions".

[pErvinalia]

Trump buffoonery exhibit A (and this is just today).
http://www.businessinsider.de/donald-tr ... ?r=US&IR=T

If you really need more... I mean, if you really, really need more. I mean if you seriously, really need more. I can do that. I shouldn't have to. It's pretty self-explanatory, but if you insist on beating a dead horse, then I can pick a news story from almost any day.

Yeah, that's pretty much my view. Sometimes I think Coito lives under a rock. Stuff that is common knowledge or self-evident to most people is totally foreign to him. It's bizarre.

[Tyrannical]

Here is an argument from Breitbart on points offered to support a Trump Presidency:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... rump-2016/

Other than attacking the source -- what's your response to the substantive points?

Are you seriously suggesting that a candidate for the US presidency is suitable for the job when one of his few concretely announced policies is to expel all of the 10 or 15 million Mexicans, build a 3,145 km (1,954 miles) long wall to keep them out and make Mexico pay for it? Apart from the utter absurdity of it, has Trump even spent a minute speculating about the consequences such as how the US will cope without harvesters, lawn mowers and domestic helpers?

Well, according to free market theory wages for those jobs will go up. Most of Trump's plan to expel the illegals is to just enforce the current law. After a few dozen human resource ladies are arrested and jailed by the FBI for hiring illegals, all companies will refuse to hire them. Then they just leave.

[Animavore]

Trump buffoonery exhibit A (and this is just today).
http://www.businessinsider.de/donald-tr ... ?r=US&IR=T

If you really need more... I mean, if you really, really need more. I mean if you seriously, really need more. I can do that. I shouldn't have to. It's pretty self-explanatory, but if you insist on beating a dead horse, then I can pick a news story from almost any day.

Yeah, that's pretty much my view. Sometimes I think Coito lives under a rock. Stuff that is common knowledge or self-evident to most people is totally foreign to him. It's bizarre.

It's possible he's using a different metric for buffoonery than I am I realised last night. If that's the case then there's not much else to say.

[pErvinalia]

Possibly. But surely he can't think gross sexism and making fun of disabled people in the manner of a 10yr old is adult respectable behaviour. Though, with Coit, one never knows...

[Hermit]

Here is an argument from Breitbart on points offered to support a Trump Presidency:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... rump-2016/

Other than attacking the source -- what's your response to the substantive points?

Are you seriously suggesting that a candidate for the US presidency is suitable for the job when one of his few concretely announced policies is to expel all of the 10 or 15 million Mexicans, build a 3,145 km (1,954 miles) long wall to keep them out and make Mexico pay for it? Apart from the utter absurdity of it, has Trump even spent a minute speculating about the consequences such as how the US will cope without harvesters, lawn mowers and domestic helpers?

Well, according to free market theory wages for those jobs will go up. Most of Trump's plan to expel the illegals is to just enforce the current law. After a few dozen human resource ladies are arrested and jailed by the FBI for hiring illegals, all companies will refuse to hire them. Then they just leave.

You missed the main points, so I added emphasis. HTH.

[Svartalf]

Well, if he wants Mex to get out of the NAFTA which mainly benefits the USA in the first place, that's his business, though there'll be an even steadier flow of illegals, as the maquiladoras south of the border will close up once their products are subjected to customs taxes and whatnot...

[Tyrannical]

A wall isn't exactly difficult to build, even ancient China managed it without the aid of heavy machinery

As for how to pay for it......
Cease assets of illegals working in the country as those assets were derived through criminal means.
Higher visa fees for "legal" Mexicans entering the country.
Fines for illegal entry
Or simply use the illegals as a slave labor force as payment for their crime.

[pErvinalia]

Building a gigantic wall. Seriously. In the 21st century? The guy is backwards.

[Svartalf]

China iss the next world power, he just knows that they were onto something with that Great Wall

[rainbow]

Here is an argument from Breitbart on points offered to support a Trump Presidency:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... rump-2016/

Other than attacking the source -- what's your response to the substantive points?

Are you seriously suggesting that a candidate for the US presidency is suitable for the job when one of his few concretely announced policies is to expel all of the 10 or 15 million Mexicans, build a 3,145 km (1,954 miles) long wall to keep them out and make Mexico pay for it? Apart from the utter absurdity of it, has Trump even spent a minute speculating about the consequences such as how the US will cope without harvesters, lawn mowers and domestic helpers?

Well, according to free market theory wages for those jobs will go up.

...but you don't believe in a free market.