Why must you keep making things up about me?rEvolutionist wrote:Well it bears repeating: There is context you are totally unaware of. If you can't deal with that, take a fucking pill.Hermit wrote:Well, he was asked to provide evidence justifying his accustations. This is what he came up with, and he turns out to be spectacularly wrong.rEvolutionist wrote:The thing is, though, that I basically believe Surr has got it right (not from that quote alone, but from knowing SDs history). I totally could believe that SD holds those views.
SD got caught out big time about his signature, which Surr quoted as: "NEVER WRONG" When Surr mentioned that, SD replied "I will never believe that freedom is ever wrong. I won't apologise for that." then added "What on earth did you, or anyone else, think that "never wrong" referred to if not my belief in liberty?!" Then Scott1328 exposed those replies as big, fat lies by quoting another one of SD's posts, which bears repeating here: "And I thought PZ Myers couldn't sink any lower. Guess I was wrong. Thanks a lot PZ, I'm going to have to change my fucking signature now!". Thank you Scott.Is anybody surprised that SD has not commented on the matter of his signature since?
You keep handwaving in the same manner as Surr. Vague comments like "Surr got it right" and "from knowing SDs history", nothing more from either of you. I won't bother asking you to substantiate your trolling and racism accusations because I already know your reply.
ETA: Scott's example is just one of the very many bits of context which makes up SDs history. Basically lying with absolute ease.
You singularly fail to support any of your claims which tells it's own story.
It's my policy to not kick a guy when he's down, but if you persist with this utter invention I may not be able to hold back.