"They may have..." is the critical failure in your argument. You know fuck-all about black holes. All you think you know is based on math, not on close-up observation of actual black holes. Theories and math are not adequate safety protocols for such dangerous experimentation, particularly because even the physicists at CERN don't know everything about particle physics, much less black holes, which is why the device was built in the first place.JimC wrote:As usual when you assert anything about physics, you are totally incorrect. Whether mini-black holes disappear via Hawking radiation or not is unimportant, although virtually certain (in fact, they may have already been created, and disappeared before they can be observed). Their gravitational effect is miniscule.Seth wrote:
In the case of tiny black holes what matters is if they factually do evaporate, a hypothesis that has not yet been proven to be true with critically robust scientific evidence. Until that hypothesis is proven it is inherently dangerous to fuck about with black holes, mini or otherwise, anywhere close to Earth.
And yet again, the science community rightfully ignores the pathetic rants of the ignorant, so your bluster is utterly impotent.
As usual...
Until science knows with absolute certainty that small black holes "evaporate" quickly and cannot sustain themselves long enough to swallow earth through rigorous scientific observation of black holes themselves, then you need to quit fucking about and wait till you can conduct your experiments with black holes safely, somewhere far from earth. You have absolutely no right whatsoever to place earth at risk, even if you theorize that the risk is non-existent.
So are micro black holes, you dunderhead !. So why are you shitting yourself?
