Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by cronus » Mon Nov 16, 2015 10:55 am

Much better cinematography but something missing, morality?....can't help but feel the folks who gave the world Iraq and Vietnam and Camp X-Ray maybe shouldn't be doing this? :nono:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74076
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by JimC » Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:53 pm

Somewhat cryptic, scumps...

Phillip K. Dick?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by laklak » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:13 pm

I assume he's talking about the movie "Fatherland", starring Rutger Hauer, about the Nazi's winning WWII. From the novel by Robert Harris. It appears they've made P.K.Dick's "Man in the High Castle" into a TV series. Fatherland was quite good, but I haven't seen High Castle.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by laklak » Mon Nov 16, 2015 9:15 pm

Just checked, Amazon is doing Man in the High Castle. I've got Amazon streaming TV, will have to take a gander at it.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39810
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Brian Peacock » Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:49 pm

Both books are fabulous, but I can't imagine TMITHC being anything but a disaster as a TV series.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by cronus » Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:54 pm

You can see how far they've come with lighting, optics, camera angles and so forth by watching the free first one of TMITHC. Almost movie quality filmed on a TV series budget....
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39810
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Brian Peacock » Tue Nov 17, 2015 1:57 pm

I don't doubt the book is technically enactable but I can't see its overt anti war sentiments being anything but moreish parodied. Will be more than happy to be proven wrong though. :)
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by laklak » Tue Nov 17, 2015 3:14 pm

The best work these days is done on TV. Game of Thrones, True Detective, Fargo, The Borgias, The Tudors, all are as good if not better than most cinematic movies.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by cronus » Tue Nov 17, 2015 3:32 pm

Nice twist at the end of episode one. Not too many subplots happening at the same time that TV dizziness sets in. Not having read the book can't contrast the two...but good enough in itself. Especially liked the Japanese guy consulting his period I Ching what-not...very authentic looking...
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
rachelbean
"awesome."
Posts: 15757
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:08 am
About me: I'm a nerd.
Location: Wales, aka not England
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by rachelbean » Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:10 am

Brian Peacock wrote:Both books are fabulous, but I can't imagine TMITHC being anything but a disaster as a TV series.
TMITHC is one of my favourite books. I've only seen the pilot episode of the show but I have pretty high hopes so far. Only time will tell, starting the binge watching Friday :cheer:
lordpasternack wrote:Yeah - I fuckin' love oppressin' ma wimmin, like I love chowin' on ma bacon and tuggin' on ma ol' cock… ;)
Pappa wrote:God is a cunt! I wank over pictures of Jesus! I love Darwin so much I'd have sex with his bones!!!!
Image

User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Pappa » Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:45 pm

I've read Fatherland, but not seen the TV show. I've seen The Man In The High Castle but not read the book.

Fatherland was a pretty good book from what I recall. The Man In The High Castle is fucking great. One of the best things I've seen in ages.
For information on ways to help support Rationalia financially, see our funding page.


When the aliens do come, everything we once thought was cool will then make us ashamed.

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 40989
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Svartalf » Wed Feb 24, 2016 5:56 pm

Funny, every time I read the Man in the High Castle, I like it less.
Fatherland was okay.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Forty Two » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:42 pm

Crumple wrote:Much better cinematography but something missing, morality?....can't help but feel the folks who gave the world Iraq and Vietnam and Camp X-Ray maybe shouldn't be doing this? :nono:
A detention center like Guantanamo is not a uniquely American invention. Remember things like how the British imprisoned suspected terrorists without trial in Northern Ireland. They detained hundreds of "terrorists" without public charge, trial or conviction. That wasn't unusual, either, and the US really just caught up with the "civilized nations" on that issue, rather than broke new ground.

Moreover, Vietnam was a French colonial thing. The French invaded, controlled and colonized French Indochina from the mid-to-late 1800s on, and they were fighting a near constant war there for decades before the US involvement escalated. We simply took over from the French, after they decided to bail out after the humiliating defeat at Dien Bien Phu. France gave the world Vietnam, not the US. Granted, the US could well have left Vietnam to the Communists in the late 1950s and washed their hands of it. But, taking over an issue is not the same as "giving the world" the issue.

And, again, Iraq -- the Brits gave the world Iraq, when they arbitrarily carved it out of the dead carcass of the Ottoman Empire, without regard for the ethnic and local political boundaries recognized by the local population. They then continued to meddle in Iraq for the entirety of the 20th century.

But, what's the point here - you think it's hypocritical for some reason? TMITHC is about an alternative history where the US loses the war, and the Krauts and the Nips divide up the US. How does US involvement in Vietnam, Iraq and with Gitmo have anything to do with that?
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Animavore » Wed Feb 24, 2016 6:59 pm

The British also gave the world the US.
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: Fatherland vs Man In The High Castle

Post by Forty Two » Wed Feb 24, 2016 7:32 pm

Animavore wrote:The British also gave the world the US.
Good point.

“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest