What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually says

[DaveDodo007]

Turns out Connie St Louis. is a liar, fraud, thief, attention whore and agenda driven bitch. (in other words a feminist) which will be a surprise to no one except gullible lefty liberal sheep.

The EU report appears to dovetail with Sir Tim’s own version of events. Meanwhile, Connie St Louis’s account is shared by two fellow witnesses: Deborah Blum, an academic from Wisconsin, and Ivan Oransky, co-founder of a science website called Retraction Watch. Although, following the leaked report, Blum and Oransky told The Times that they could not recall enough to confirm or deny the additional quotes from Sir Tim.

Strangely, given that there were more than 90 other journalists present at the fateful lunch in Seoul, no other detailed accounts of the toast have emerged.
St Louis did not make a shorthand transcript of it. And, again very strangely, no tape-recording appears to exist.
Perhaps, therefore, we should ask two other related questions: who exactly is Connie St Louis? And why, exactly, should we trust her word over that of a Nobel laureate?
A good place to start is the website of London’s City University, where St Louis has, for more than a decade, been employed to run a postgraduate course in science journalism.
Here, on a page outlining her CV, she is described as follows:
‘Connie St Louis . . . is an award-winning freelance broadcaster, journalist, writer and scientist.
‘She presents and produces a range of programmes for BBC Radio 4 and BBC World Service . . . She writes for numerous outlets, including The Independent, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The Sunday Times, BBC On Air magazine and BBC Online.’
All very prestigious. Comforting, no doubt, for potential students considering whether to devote a year of their lives (and money) to completing an MA course under her stewardship. Except, that is for one small detail: almost all of these supposed ‘facts’ appear to be untrue.
For one thing, Connie St Louis does not ‘present and produce’ a range of programmes for Radio 4.
Her most recent work for the station, a documentary about pharmaceuticals called The Magic Bullet, was broadcast in October 2007.
For another, it’s demonstrably false to say she ‘writes’ for The Independent, Daily Mail and The Sunday Times.
Digital archives for all three newspapers, which stretch back at least 20 years, contain no by-lined articles that she has written for any of these titles, either in their print or online editions. The Mail’s accounts department has no record of ever paying her for a contribution.

Her work for The Guardian appears to consist of two online articles: one published in 2013; the other, about the Sir Tim Hunt affair, went live (online) this week.
Curiously, that 1,000-word piece, in which St Louis recalled the scandal, was heavily edited after publication. Around 30 changes, some of them significant, were made to it. In an apparent contradiction of usual Guardian policy, the version now running online contains no disclaimer detailing this fact.
Elsewhere on the City University web page, readers are led to believe that St Louis has either become, or is soon to become, a published author.
‘She is a recipient of the prestigious Joseph Rowntree Journalist Fellowship to write a book based on her acclaimed two-part Radio 4 documentary series, Raising Ham,’ it reads.
But that is not the full story. In 2005, St Louis did, indeed, receive the liberal organisation’s ‘fellowship’. She was given £50,000, which was supposed to support her while she wrote the book in question.
However, no book was ever published. Or, indeed, written. An entire decade later, the project remains a work in progress.
Asked to explain these discrepancies — although details of the claims are carried, remember, on the internet page where she is supposed to present her credentials to students and fellow academics — St Louis said she had done interviews for the Daily Mail but conceded it was ‘possible’ that she had never written for the paper.
She said her by-lined articles in the Independent and Sunday Times may have been published more than two decades ago. Asked how she could, therefore, justify the claim on her CV that she ‘writes’ for the titles, she hung up.
In a subsequent email, St Louis appeared to backtrack and insist that she has written for all the newspapers cited on her CV, but said: ‘I don’t have time . . . to find all the articles on different old computers.’

She did not respond to a question asking what awards she had ever won for journalism, science, broadcasting or writing.
With regard to the £50,000 fellowship, she added: ‘I didn’t finish the Rowntree book I was writing because I had breast cancer and was extremely ill for a year.
‘Then, after that, I had to work to look after my family. It doesn [sic] take away the fact that I won it [the £50,000] and still hope to finish the book does it?’
Readers can, of course, draw their own conclusions.
In common with most academics, St Louis also uses her online CV to cite articles she has previously published in prestigious academic journals. It claims that she has published three. However, even this is misleading. Two of the three cited journal articles are the same: a piece for the British Medical Journal entitled: ‘Can Twitter predict disease outbreaks?’
Are such errors merely sloppy? Or were they designed to mislead? And what do they tell us about the attention to detail of a woman whose purported recollection of a short lunchtime toast has effectively ruined a Nobel laureate’s career?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... first.html

[Brian Peacock]

So sexism is OK then. Cool.

[DaveDodo007]

So sexism is OK then. Cool.

Against men it is actively promoted, funded, ingrained and government policy which has never bothered you as I recall.

[Brian Peacock]

You poor love. You're just sensitive, thasall.

[DaveDodo007]

You poor love. You're just sensitive, thasall.

you support women who are (according to gullible bridge and magic bean buying morons) are oppressed.

I care about broken men who nobody else gives a shit about and I'm mocked for being sensitive, stay classy Brian.

[Brian Peacock]

You can fix the broken men Dave - I'm sure you can. Now don't get all in a tissy dear, you'll ladder your tights.

[DaveDodo007]

You can fix the broken men Dave - I'm sure you can. Now don't get all in a tissy dear, you'll ladder your tights.

Lol, I remember when you were named as 'not a man hating feminist' by missus Bean no less. Didn't take long for your true feminist colours to come to the surface.

[Brian Peacock]

Shhh. Real man talkin'.

[DaveDodo007]

Shhh. Real man talkin'.

real men aren't feminist and never will be. Show me a real man who is a white knight? Show me a real man who is a mangina? Show me a real man who is a SIMP? What a surprise that women don't go out with white knight mangina simps and why should they . Women already have a pussy and they don't need another one. Though you show your manhood by supporting Nobel Prize winners getting the sack by lying, fraudulent agenda driven bullshitters who are refusing to answer questions now they are being called out on their bullshit. Because nothing says you are a rationalist more than ignoring the evidence and promoting feelz are realz, go you and your bigfoot and fuel can't bend steel beanz for realz.

Scratch the surface of a lefty and you will find a Gulag watchtower guard every time. The sick evil scum sucking maggot monsters.

[Scott1328]

Show me a real man who lets his wife chop off the tip of his dick

[Brian Peacock]

It's no skin off my nose.

[pErvinalia]

Shhh. Real man talkin'.

real men aren't feminist and never will be. Show me a real man who is a white knight? Show me a real man who is a mangina? Show me a real man who is a SIMP? What a surprise that women don't go out with white knight mangina simps and why should they . Women already have a pussy and they don't need another one. Though you show your manhood by supporting Nobel Prize winners getting the sack by lying, fraudulent agenda driven bullshitters who are refusing to answer questions now they are being called out on their bullshit. Because nothing says you are a rationalist more than ignoring the evidence and promoting feelz are realz, go you and your bigfoot and fuel can't bend steel beanz for realz.

Scratch the surface of a lefty and you will find a Gulag watchtower guard every time. The sick evil scum sucking maggot monsters.

I'm a real man and I'd kick your fucking arse at pretty much every manly task you'd care to name AND at intellectualism. Also modesty. I'm the most fucking modest guy I know.

[laklak]

I'm a Real Man(tn) too! I challenge any and all comers to a tequila shot duel. We'll find out who's the Manliest Real Man, by gum.

[DaveDodo007]

Too true.

http://i.imgur.com/knmwR9A.webm

[DaveDodo007]

Shhh. Real man talkin'.

real men aren't feminist and never will be. Show me a real man who is a white knight? Show me a real man who is a mangina? Show me a real man who is a SIMP? What a surprise that women don't go out with white knight mangina simps and why should they . Women already have a pussy and they don't need another one. Though you show your manhood by supporting Nobel Prize winners getting the sack by lying, fraudulent agenda driven bullshitters who are refusing to answer questions now they are being called out on their bullshit. Because nothing says you are a rationalist more than ignoring the evidence and promoting feelz are realz, go you and your bigfoot and fuel can't bend steel beanz for realz.

Scratch the surface of a lefty and you will find a Gulag watchtower guard every time. The sick evil scum sucking maggot monsters.

I'm a real man and I'd kick your fucking arse at pretty much every manly task you'd care to name AND at intellectualism. Also modesty. I'm the most fucking modest guy I know.

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.