What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually says

Post Reply
User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60734
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Jun 23, 2015 3:45 pm

Forty Two wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:
Forty Two wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote:His opinion is part of a broader narrative. To change the narrative you've got to address the individual opinions.
Not everyone wants the narrative changed, and there are many opinions on what the narrative should be changed to.

Address them all you want.

However, what they did to Hunt is much like what folks did to Bertrand Russell back in the day when folks got him fired from Trinity College and later from City College of NY.

He was publishing views that were part of a broader narrative that offended a lot of people.
This sort of reason doesn't cut it, as there's a large difference between deconstructing bigoted opinions (or at least ones that reinforce wider bigotry) and rational opinions.
This is just saying that it's o.k. to drum someone out of the job if their opinions are those I don't agree with.
No it's not.

I'm not reading the rest. I'm becoming more convinced you are coito.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Forty Two » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:06 pm

Interested to know how you think it's different.

Cogito? I know.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60734
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:13 pm

Coito, I fuck. ;) You, I mean he, is a former member here who buggered off basically because I hounded you, I mean him, off the site for being a bigot. Some people thought I was nasty. If you are him, or simply appear similar to him, I don't want to revisit old ground (me being nasty).

It's different because bigotry is based in irrationality mainly, and rationality isn't. And just because there isn't a definitive line between the two doesn't mean that it's always not possible to tell the two cases apart.
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Forty Two » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:28 pm

ok then - not following completely- but -Well, what was bigoted about what Hunt said?

You fall in love with women
They fall in love with you
...they cry.

Bigotry =
stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own. Www.dictionary.com or

: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group) Merriam-Webster

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60734
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by pErvinalia » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:32 pm

I might be mistaken but he was suggesting that women don't belong in scientific labs. That is bigotry, if indeed that is what he was saying (or implying).
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39943
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Brian Peacock » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:36 pm

Indeed. Moral disagreement does not equal a 'torch and pitchfork' campaign, just as speaking out against sexist bollocks in the workplace does not equal undue and 'politically correct' moral legislation.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Forty Two » Tue Jun 23, 2015 4:57 pm

A bunch of Nobel prize winners called it a lynch mob. http://www.bostonnewstime.com/regional/ ... s-job.html

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by cronus » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:19 pm

No man likes to realize he is less than supernaturally fair and even more so in science. Sexist pigs need to get over it and stop supporting out-dated models of behavior. It is to the credit of women that they haven't been more aggressive thus far in their rebut-all of this sexist pigs backwards stance. No, science owes it to the future female Einstein who overturns established scientific paradigms in their multitudes to stop pretending this is a natural way of things. Equality means equality. Is it too much to ask that both are equally genders are crowned in lights on the day of discovery? Will it ruin the equations? The chemicals or physics will moan about change? :read:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Forty Two
Posts: 14978
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2015 2:01 pm
About me: I am the grammar snob about whom your mother warned you.
Location: The Of Color Side of the Moon
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Forty Two » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:32 pm

Scumple wrote:No man likes to realize he is less than supernaturally fair and even more so in science. Sexist pigs need to get over it and stop supporting out-dated models of behavior. It is to the credit of women that they haven't been more aggressive thus far in their rebut-all of this sexist pigs backwards stance. No, science owes it to the future female Einstein who overturns established scientific paradigms in their multitudes to stop pretending this is a natural way of things. Equality means equality. Is it too much to ask that both are equally genders are crowned in lights on the day of discovery? Will it ruin the equations? The chemicals or physics will moan about change? :read:

....as long as the chicks are hot.....http://cltampa.com/dailyloaf/archives/2 ... Yma2vlViko :leave: [this forum has the best emoticons ever...]
Last edited by Forty Two on Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“When I was in college, I took a terrorism class. ... The thing that was interesting in the class was every time the professor said ‘Al Qaeda’ his shoulders went up, But you know, it is that you don’t say ‘America’ with an intensity, you don’t say ‘England’ with the intensity. You don’t say ‘the army’ with the intensity,” she continued. “... But you say these names [Al Qaeda] because you want that word to carry weight. You want it to be something.” - Ilhan Omar

User avatar
cronus
Black Market Analyst
Posts: 18122
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:09 pm
About me: Illis quos amo deserviam
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by cronus » Tue Jun 23, 2015 5:36 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Scumple wrote:No man likes to realize he is less than supernaturally fair and even more so in science. Sexist pigs need to get over it and stop supporting out-dated models of behavior. It is to the credit of women that they haven't been more aggressive thus far in their rebut-all of this sexist pigs backwards stance. No, science owes it to the future female Einstein who overturns established scientific paradigms in their multitudes to stop pretending this is a natural way of things. Equality means equality. Is it too much to ask that both are equally genders are crowned in lights on the day of discovery? Will it ruin the equations? The chemicals or physics will moan about change? :read:

....as long as the chicks are hot..... :leave: [this forum has the best emoticons ever...]
Exactly, if it is done well both male and female scientists will be inspired to compete in the next generation of Nobel Prize winners, men out of lust and women out of spite.... :read:
What will the world be like after its ruler is removed?

User avatar
Mr.Samsa
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:06 am
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Mr.Samsa » Tue Jun 23, 2015 11:39 pm

Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote: Well it's important because your initial outrage was predicated on the idea that he got fired for a joke. He didn't and I was mostly just pointing out that you held a wrong belief.

As to why the belief itself is important, well that's because discrimination in the workplace is both morally and legally wrong. A person who holds a PR position who is objectively bad at PR probably doesn't deserve that job. It doesn't seem at all dangerous for someone who is bad at their job to be fired from that job. In fact, that seems to be the sensible and expected outcome.
I wasn't outraged, i was opposed. And, it was a joke comment. It also doesn't matter to me whether it was a joke or not.
You sounded outraged. And it wasn't a joke, I proved that, remember?
Forty Two wrote:My objection is not with his employer for firing him. My objection is with the torch and pitchfork crowd who jump on every perceived slight or un-PC statement to ruin people's lives. I think their reaction is over the top.
Sure, but I demonstrated that it wasn't a case of any perceived slight or a case of it being "un-PC". He was criticised for saying something objectively stupid and performing poorly at his job. The reaction was simply people discussing the issue on Twitter and saying he sounded like an idiot. How is that "over the top"? What would have happened in your ideal world - ban all people from criticising him?
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote:Sorry, I thought "same kind of bullshit" and the reference to the time period notable for it's horrific misunderstanding of facts relating to gender was enough to indicate that your beliefs aren't true. Is that clarification enough or did you need a signed formal document?
You are seriously saying that men and women working together don't result in some men and some women falling in love with each other? Come on now... http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/ ... ance-2013/ - up to 59% of the workforce has been involved in romance or dating with a work colleague.

And, women do cry more easily than men. http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/01/wh ... n-men.html and for twice as long -- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... finds.html
Haha I love that you're going to try to use pseudoscience to back up your sexism. Let's accept that men and women will sometimes date or fool around when they work together. So what? Men also date men and women also date women. Having single sex labs isn't going to help if that's your concern. Plus we have codes of ethics and professionalism to curb it actually affecting work.

And let's assume that women do cry more than men, so what? How is that at all relevant to the idea that trained female scientists, experts in their field, will break down and cry at the merest mention of criticism?
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote: I think when you say it's had a "chilling effect", I think you mean that it's had a chilling effect on bigots. Because, as I mention, all it means to be "politically correct" is to be called out for being a bigot. So whilst bigots might have had a hard time since we've been discussed social issues more seriously, the rest of the world has absolutely been loving it as it's opened up free expression to levels never before experienced. No longer is it appropriate to dismiss black people or women on the assumption that they aren't smart enough to have opinions worth sharing! I know that idea is scary and foreign to bigots, but that's just the truth.
That isn't all it means, as the Hunt example shows. He's not a bigot in the least, nor was what he said bigoted.
Well sure, but that's just because you're a bigot who believes the same thing. Of course you wouldn't want to identify yourself as a bigot by calling him out on his bigotry. The rest of the world can see though.
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote:
Also, it reminds me of the line from Chris Rock: "For the first time in the history of the world, the white man has to watch what he says.".
And, now Chris Rock won't play college campuses because of this same crap... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/0 ... 50308.html
I don't see how that's relevant, he's not talking about wanting to spread bigotry and not being allowed to. He did however stop using his "nigga" joke when a bunch of white people used it as an excuse to call black people niggers.
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote: What do you mean he didn't hurt anyone? He's perpetuating myths that are actively holding back women in the field, and he's doing so from a position where he's supposed to educate the public on issues in science and give good PR to the university.
I mean that nobody was hurt. These aren't myths. Men and women do get romantically involved in labs, as any other workplace, and women do cry much more and for longer time periods, than men. That's not a myth.
Those myths do hurt people though, what are you talking about?
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote:
Did you also defend Watson when he got in trouble for saying that the problem with Africans is that they are inherently stupid even though they can make good janitors?
Post what he really said, not your recasting of it. As for what he really said, I'd support proving him wrong, not driving him out of his position.
Don't worry, I have a good idea that you'll be as eager to defend the racist as you are to defend the sexist.
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote: DaveDodo is literally saying that.
Well, I don't know what Dave Dodo said, but of course they should be and are "allowed" to criticize Hunt. The big problem is not mere criticism, but rather a mob driving him out of his job.
The problem is that you're also saying it. The only thing that has happened is that people on Twitter criticised him. You said it was an "overreaction", which means that you think the speech should be curbed (i.e. censorship).
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote: Just to be clear, nobody petitioned his firing and nobody contacted his employer.
That's not true. Lots of people contacted his employer.
Can you link to the evidence there?
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote:
So you're anti free speech and free expression?
No, of course not. I'm using mine to express my opinion as to whose right and whose wrong in this instance.
You are saying that, if it happened, there would be a problem with people protesting him holding the position he did after making those comments (i.e. curbing free expression).
Forty Two wrote:
Mr.Samsa wrote: And those people are sexist idiots too. If they hold senior positions, especially as PR people, then they should be fired too. Luckily I don't think people made of straw hold any university positions.
According to many feminists, they can't be sexist, because they are in the disempowered group.

It's not a straw person. Ex. Prof. Mary Daly
It is a straw person, or at the very least a woeful misunderstanding of the science on bigotry. Feminists are a political group not an oppressed minority. I assume you were thinking of feminists only consisting of women. In that case, the scientific definition of sexism does say that women cannot be sexist towards men because they are the dominant group and women don't have the social power for it to constitute sexism. But that doesn't mean women can't be sexist to other women, or black people racist towards other black people. They can repeat the bigotry and harmful social norms that attack their groups even when they are members of it.

Jesus christ, why don't bigots just pick up a science book every now and then?
Forty Two wrote:A bunch of Nobel prize winners called it a lynch mob. http://www.bostonnewstime.com/regional/ ... s-job.html
Notice how most of them don't seem to know the specifics of what happened or present any evidence or reasoning to think a "lynch mob" happened?

It's also kind of hilarious that they'd choose the term "lynch mob" (which refers to a bunch of racists gathering together to attack black people) to describe a bigot being criticised for attacking women...
“The real question is not whether machines think but whether men do. The mystery which surrounds a thinking machine already surrounds a thinking man.” - B. F. Skinner.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by JimC » Wed Jun 24, 2015 1:38 am

The only important thing is whether his employers had the right to fire him, given his role as a science PR person.

They had that right, and exercised it. End of story.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Mr.Samsa
Posts: 713
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:06 am
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by Mr.Samsa » Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:03 am

JimC wrote:The only important thing is whether his employers had the right to fire him, given his role as a science PR person.

They had that right, and exercised it. End of story.
Yep, well said.

The only response these people seem to have is that if someone is doing a bad job then you shouldn't be allowed to tell their employer or criticise them a lot. It's irrelevant to this case because nobody went to his employer and the level of criticism obviously didn't reach the levels of "hounding", but all they're really saying is that they want to cut down on free speech and free expression, yet don't want to accept that that's their position.
“The real question is not whether machines think but whether men do. The mystery which surrounds a thinking machine already surrounds a thinking man.” - B. F. Skinner.

User avatar
rainbow
Posts: 13760
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:10 am
About me: Egal wie dicht du bist, Goethe war Dichter
Where ever you are, Goethe was a Poet.
Location: Africa
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by rainbow » Wed Jun 24, 2015 8:20 am

JimC wrote:The only important thing is whether his employers had the right to fire him, given his role as a science PR person.

They had that right, and exercised it. End of story.
I don't think that is the important thing.

The important thing is to attract young people to the Sciences.
It shouldn't matter whether they are boys or girls.
I call bullshit - Alfred E Einstein
BArF−4

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: What Nobel winner Tim Hunt's sexist outburst actually sa

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Jun 24, 2015 12:25 pm

Sorry it's the Daily Mail but the (better) Times article is behind a paywall.

Revealed: 'Sexist' Nobel winner went on to praise women scientists in SAME SPEECH, continuing after criticised comments by saying 'Now seriously...'
The scientist was castigated after he said women in laboratories either fell in love with their male colleagues or cried when criticised
It now appears Sir Tim followed his jocular comments with the words 'Now seriously...' before heaping praise on women
He also jokingly described himself as a 'chauvinist monster'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... nster.html

The instigators were lying to drum up a witch hunt, some people posting on this thread don't have the right to call themselves skeptics.

Edit: link anyway.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/a ... 478368.ece
Last edited by DaveDodo007 on Wed Jun 24, 2015 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests