The Objective Definition of Beauty

jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by jamest » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:44 pm

Didn't do much for me. Sounds like Morrissey (who I love) on an absolute downer. Btw, what's the first best music package... iyo?

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39943
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:52 pm

That'll be Black Lace's seminal performance of Agadoo on TOTPs in 1989 - betcha $50.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by hackenslash » Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:04 pm

jamest wrote:Btw, what's the first best music package... iyo?


Totality, in my humble.

Great song, great video, complete symmetry.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by jamest » Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:18 pm

That's better, though I suspect your choices are a consequence of your music education. So, arguably, influenced by reason?

I'm not sure that reason necessarily leads to beauty. :ask:

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39943
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by Brian Peacock » Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:25 pm

That was goosebumpy stuff. Love that CD. Muse peaked early and hard didn't they? Their first three album releases were their best work in my humble etc.
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by JimC » Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:49 pm

Deep down, it's all about sex...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by hackenslash » Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:37 pm

jamest wrote:That's better, though I suspect your choices are a consequence of your music education. So, arguably, influenced by reason?
With me, everything is influenced by reason. And of course my choices are a consequence of my music education, because they're musical judgements. I did have a very different music education for someone in my profession, though.
I'm not sure that reason necessarily leads to beauty. :ask:
Not sure that 'influenced by reason' and 'leading from reason' are necessarily equivalent statements, which you would have realised if you'd given it a moment's thought for a change.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by jamest » Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:55 pm

hackenslash wrote:
jamest wrote:That's better, though I suspect your choices are a consequence of your music education. So, arguably, influenced by reason? [/quiote]

With me, everything is influenced by reason. And of course my choices are a consequence of my music education, because they're musical judgements. I did have a very different music education for someone in my profession, though.
I'm not sure that reason necessarily leads to beauty. :ask:
Not sure that 'influenced by reason' and 'leading from reason' are necessarily equivalent statements, which you would have realised if you'd given it a moment's thought for a change.
Shut up Mr Grumpy... answer the question.

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by hackenslash » Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:56 pm

I did answer the question. Look again.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by laklak » Thu Apr 02, 2015 10:58 pm

The soft smile of the beloved, the cherubic face of a loved child, the ...


Fuck it. It's big tits.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by jamest » Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:00 pm

hackenslash wrote:I did answer the question. Look again.
My point - as should have been obvious - was whether reason/knowledge should have any say in what constitutes beauty. As such, your contribution failed dismally to address this point.

jamest
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by jamest » Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:01 pm

laklak wrote:The soft smile of the beloved, the cherubic face of a loved child, the ...


Fuck it. It's big tits.
See... a man devoid of reason...

User avatar
Ian
Mr Incredible
Posts: 16975
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by Ian » Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:03 pm

I think ass is more important than tits. But that's just my opinion.

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by hackenslash » Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:06 pm

jamest wrote:My point - as should have been obvious - was whether reason/knowledge should have any say in what constitutes beauty. As such, your contribution failed dismally to address this point.
Errr, except in providing an unequivocal answer in the affirmative, you mean?

Seriously, I thought you could at least read competently.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

User avatar
hackenslash
Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
Posts: 1380
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
Contact:

Re: The Objective Definition of Beauty

Post by hackenslash » Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:07 pm

Ian wrote:I think ass is more important than tits. But that's just my opinion.
Objectively, it depends entirely on which way each of you is facing.
Dogma is the death of the intellect

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests