Well, he said as much, didn't he?rainbow wrote:What you've just suggested is uncivilised and belligerent.Seth wrote:I agree. We should have leveled Baghdad with cruise missiles, JDAMs, Arclight strikes and other stand-off munitions the first time, and then destroyed the entire technological infrastructure of Iraq, from dams to sewage plants to dog food factories and kept blowing them up until the Iraqis handed over Saddam and his henchmen to us themselves. Not a single American boot should have touched Iraqi soil. Ever.piscator wrote:But it was damn sure a pisspoor reason to spend $5Trillion of my tax dollars doing it.
We should do that to everybody who drags us into war by being uncivilized and belligerent.
Toldjaso! - WMDs in Iraq
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Still think there were no WMDs in Iraq?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
Re: Still think there were no WMDs in Iraq?
Not if they evacuate Baghdad first. If they don't, then it's their problem.rEvolutionist wrote:False dilemma fallacy. I never said you advocated killing everyone in Baghdad. Levelling Baghdad will, however, result in mass civilian casualties. This is simple logical reasoning. Surely you can manage this level of logic?Seth wrote:Yes, I did. I didn't say anything about killing everyone in Baghdad however.rEvolutionist wrote: You said we should have "levelled Bagdad".
If that's what I meant, I would have said "We should have used biological and chemical weapons to kill every last living grasshopper-eating, camel-fucking raghead motherfucker in Iraq/Iran/Syria/Egypt etc.". Oh wait, that's what Saddam tried to do to the Kurds...![]()
It's also irrlevant to whether you are an ass-hat.Irrelevant to whether you are an uncivilised thug.
But I didn't. It's hardly my fault, or my concern, that you insist on misinterpreting what I actually write to suit your own need for ad hom argumentation.
Not if they evacuate.There's no misrepresentation. Levelling Baghdad will result in mass civilian casualties. This is simple logical reasoning. Surely you can manage this level of logic?![]()
I've argued a good many things, regularly and irregularly, none of which may be thought to be an accurate or actual representation of my personal beliefs, as you well know.And you've argued for bombing civilian populations regularly in the past.
What I know is that you believe almost everything you spew out.
And you know that how, exactly?
What's obvious is that you're an excellent example of the value of a shiny lure.That much is obvious from interacting with you for years.
And I yours.And regardless of what you may or may not actually believe, we only have your words here to go by
Depends on what you mean by "civilisation" (sic). Civilization is not a suicide pact that requires tolerance of any and all behavior by the uncivilized. Even the UN, for all it's politically motivated uselessness, acknowledges that, which is why it has armed troops at its beck and call, for what they are worth, which isn't much.
And your words, while criticising others for being uncivilised and barbaric, are the very epitome of lacking in civilisation.
I'm not the one chopping off hands, sawing off heads and stoning women to death, nor am I the one flying airliners into buildings...or mountains.For you to complain about uncivilized and belligerent people is irony of the most spectacular order.
Not really. Lie down with pigs and you get dirty.False dilemma fallacy.
So you agree that you are a giant irony fail? Good, glad we are on the same page.[/quote]Why thank you. Fine compliment indeed coming from you. This shows that I'm doing my job just exactly as I intended to.You are THE most uncivilised poster ever seen on rd.net/ratskep/rationalia.
No, it means that you've risen to the bait, again.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Re: Still think there were no WMDs in Iraq?
Your opinion is noted. We'll remember that the next time you come begging us to pull your fat out of the fire when some uncivilized belligerents attack you. It would be uncivilized of us to interfere, according to your metric.rainbow wrote:What you've just suggested is uncivilised and belligerent.Seth wrote:I agree. We should have leveled Baghdad with cruise missiles, JDAMs, Arclight strikes and other stand-off munitions the first time, and then destroyed the entire technological infrastructure of Iraq, from dams to sewage plants to dog food factories and kept blowing them up until the Iraqis handed over Saddam and his henchmen to us themselves. Not a single American boot should have touched Iraqi soil. Ever.piscator wrote:But it was damn sure a pisspoor reason to spend $5Trillion of my tax dollars doing it.
We should do that to everybody who drags us into war by being uncivilized and belligerent.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
- pErvinalia
- On the good stuff
- Posts: 60840
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
- About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
- Location: dystopia
- Contact:
Re: Still think there were no WMDs in Iraq?
As I said, you'll bomb civilians. As I said, you are uncivilised (<- that's how most of the English speaking world spell it).Seth wrote:Not if they evacuate Baghdad first. If they don't, then it's their problem.rEvolutionist wrote:False dilemma fallacy. I never said you advocated killing everyone in Baghdad. Levelling Baghdad will, however, result in mass civilian casualties. This is simple logical reasoning. Surely you can manage this level of logic?Seth wrote:Yes, I did. I didn't say anything about killing everyone in Baghdad however.rEvolutionist wrote: You said we should have "levelled Bagdad".
I'm not the one who calls for the mass murder of civilians. That would be an ass-hat'ish thing to do.If that's what I meant, I would have said "We should have used biological and chemical weapons to kill every last living grasshopper-eating, camel-fucking raghead motherfucker in Iraq/Iran/Syria/Egypt etc.". Oh wait, that's what Saddam tried to do to the Kurds...
It's also irrlevant to whether you are an ass-hat.Irrelevant to whether you are an uncivilised thug.

Why should they evacuate because some juice up redneck in Merka wants to get a hardon blowing shit up?But I didn't. It's hardly my fault, or my concern, that you insist on misinterpreting what I actually write to suit your own need for ad hom argumentation.Not if they evacuate.There's no misrepresentation. Levelling Baghdad will result in mass civilian casualties. This is simple logical reasoning. Surely you can manage this level of logic?![]()
Bullshit. You are easier to read than a book. We've all had you worked out for years. You're a simple redneck with very little understanding of the world or civiliSation outside of Merka.I've argued a good many things, regularly and irregularly, none of which may be thought to be an accurate or actual representation of my personal beliefs, as you well know.And you've argued for bombing civilian populations regularly in the past.What I know is that you believe almost everything you spew out.
And you know that how, exactly?
What's obvious is that you're an excellent example of the value of a shiny lure.That much is obvious from interacting with you for years.
Great comeback, Professor. So, once again by agreeing, you make yourself look stupid. Do you realise that trolling yourself isn't that smart an idea??And I yours.And regardless of what you may or may not actually believe, we only have your words here to go by

Even a halfwit like you should be able to realise that mass murder isn't civilised.Depends on what you mean by "civilisation" (sic). Civilization is not a suicide pact that requires tolerance of any and all behavior by the uncivilized. Even the UN, for all it's politically motivated uselessness, acknowledges that, which is why it has armed troops at its beck and call, for what they are worth, which isn't much.And your words, while criticising others for being uncivilised and barbaric, are the very epitome of lacking in civilisation.
Yes really. For someone who's addicted to accusing others of making fallacies (even to the point that you make up bullshit fallacies), you'd think you'd understand what a clear fallacy is.I'm not the one chopping off hands, sawing off heads and stoning women to death, nor am I the one flying airliners into buildings...or mountains.For you to complain about uncivilized and belligerent people is irony of the most spectacular order.Not really.False dilemma fallacy.
If "rising to the bait" means making you look stupid, then I'm happy to keep doing it. You don't seem to realise that you troll yourself more than you troll others.No, it means that you've risen to the bait, again.So you agree that you are a giant irony fail? Good, glad we are on the same page.Why thank you. Fine compliment indeed coming from you. This shows that I'm doing my job just exactly as I intended to.You are THE most uncivilised poster ever seen on rd.net/ratskep/rationalia.

Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 10 guests