AI isn't really showing all that much progress. Systems appear "smarter", but that's only because of faster machines and better algorithms -- the cleverness is still at the keyboard, not in the silicon. The Turing test isn't even really a meaningful test of AI any more -- natural language processing is advanced enough to make a serious run at passing the test, but it's not by any definition intelligent.Scumple wrote:AI is showing progress though. It is also economic since computational tech is expanding without added investment. What you have with fusion is a 700 year project and with AI a 70 year project. In that there is a big a difference.
I'm not sure I agree that fusion is a 700 year project anyway. If you'd say a 100 year project, I might agree. And I'm becoming convinced (albeit with an open mind on the matter) that genuinely intelligent machines are not possible with current technology, or anything in the near future.