The Blinded Public

Post Reply
User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by piscator » Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:14 am

rEvolutionist wrote:As I said, you guys can shoot the shit out of each other as much as you like. But you are agreeing with my point. That is, a massive number of gun deaths isn't a smart trade off for a tiny amount of security from terrorism.

Australians somehow magically having the right to keep arms either would or would not increase annual deaths, that depends upon you as individual actors. But it would definitely be a liberty and degree of freedom you don't currently enjoy, either in reality or internet mortal combat.

America won't give up her 2nd Amendment (or her 1st) without a war or a few hundred years of frog boiling yet, but it's fun to watch people who might have spent a couple weeks on a tour of US National Parks try to change a core component of the world hegemon's national identity one redneck at a time across the internet.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by JimC » Fri Jan 30, 2015 8:08 am

rEvolutionist wrote:Yeah. I really don't care what you guys do with your gun laws. Unlike your foreign and economic policies it doesn't affect us, so I don't understand why people like BG get so worked up about it. In this case I'm just pointing out the stupidity of Seth's idea that we need more guns to protect us from the trrrrrsts. I spend most of my time here pointing out the stupidity of Seth's ideas.
I agree. I'm not going to suggest you yanks should change your gun laws - that's up to you, and I suspect in any case it would simply be impossible.

But any ludicrous arguments that Oz should relax our laws, and allow every street corner hood to have easy access to a concealable weapon can fuck right off...
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by Seth » Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:37 pm

rEvolutionist wrote:If guns became more widespread here, more criminals would have guns. That would mean more deaths from gun crime. Just like you've got in the US. It's pretty simple.
Um, the objective is to make sure that the law-abiding citizenry is always better-armed than the criminal element so that the criminal element will decide not to take the risk of getting killed when what they actually want is some pussy or 20 bucks to buy some crack.

And the long experiment here in the US with arming the public has proven that doing so is quite helpful in reducing the willingness of criminals to commit crimes of all types.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
RESiNATE
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:11 am
About me: I have looked deep into my being; good and bad makes me.
I am Ying. I am Yang. I am balance.
Location: United Kingdom, South West
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by RESiNATE » Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:19 pm

I wasn't talking about the planes strikes - I was thinking more of how a steel framed structure can collapse into itself in such a uniform manner.
"What I see and what I know cannot be added to what you see and what you know because they are not of the same kind." Douglas Adams - "Mostly Harmless"

Image

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by Seth » Sat Jan 31, 2015 12:18 am

RESiNATE wrote:I wasn't talking about the planes strikes - I was thinking more of how a steel framed structure can collapse into itself in such a uniform manner.
It's called "gravity."

The engineering analysis of the collapse showed that due to an improper design of the floor truss ends, the intense heat of the fires caused the truss ends to weaken and bend and slip off of the support brackets in the walls, causing the trussed-concrete floors to collapse straight downward, thanks to gravity. Once begun the weight of the structure on top drove the rest of the collapse. Nothing at all unusual about how the towers collapsed. It looks like an engineered collapse because in effect the mechanics involved replicated the physics involved in dropping a building using explosives. Had someone in fact mined the buildings by strapping explosives to the truss ends on several floors exactly the same pattern would have occurred.

But it wasn't explosives, it was fire weakening the steel structure, which in addition to being improperly designed was also improperly coated with fireproofing materials, allowing the heat to more rapidly weaken the steel.

Experts have examined the evidence for more than a decade and the mechanisms of collapse are well understood at this point, and they have nothing to do with internal sabotage. Crashing a giant flying incendiary bomb filled with tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel into the towers at 500 knots was completely sufficient to do the job.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
RESiNATE
Posts: 230
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:11 am
About me: I have looked deep into my being; good and bad makes me.
I am Ying. I am Yang. I am balance.
Location: United Kingdom, South West
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by RESiNATE » Sat Jan 31, 2015 8:48 am

You seem to be an expert on everything, Seth 8-) I am impressed

And the answer to the physics question, Piscator?

Well, it seems that I am completely wrong about everything. Good, it means we can all live our lives safe in the knowledge that world governments have our very best interests at heart and that they do not have hidden agendas, either personal or global.
That's good news.

All those hours of research; all those conversations with certain people that I've had over the years; all those scientists and engineers that have offered counter-argument to the research and explanations that you cite, have been a total waste of time.

I feel so silly.
:banghead:
"What I see and what I know cannot be added to what you see and what you know because they are not of the same kind." Douglas Adams - "Mostly Harmless"

Image

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by mistermack » Sat Jan 31, 2015 11:16 am

piscator wrote: Australians somehow magically having the right to keep arms either would or would not increase annual deaths, that depends upon you as individual actors. But it would definitely be a liberty and degree of freedom you don't currently enjoy, either in reality or internet mortal combat.
That's completely wrong. In your head, people only GAIN a degree of freedom by having the right to keep arms. What about the freedom that they LOSE when that happens?

Right now, I can have the normal interactions of life with complete strangers, in the knowledge that the chances that they are carrying a gun are vanishingly small.
If my next-door neighbour is beating the shit out of his little son on his front lawn, I can intervene, and take my chances, knowing at least that he isn't going to emerge in a rage, holding a gun.

The right to keep guns pervades all life in the US, and you are so used to it, you don't appreciate the benefits of not having it.
It's like living on a dung heap. After a while, you become totally unaware of the smell.
But visitors notice it straight away, and can't believe that you want to live like that.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by Seth » Sat Jan 31, 2015 6:16 pm

mistermack wrote:
piscator wrote: Australians somehow magically having the right to keep arms either would or would not increase annual deaths, that depends upon you as individual actors. But it would definitely be a liberty and degree of freedom you don't currently enjoy, either in reality or internet mortal combat.
That's completely wrong. In your head, people only GAIN a degree of freedom by having the right to keep arms. What about the freedom that they LOSE when that happens?

Right now, I can have the normal interactions of life with complete strangers, in the knowledge that the chances that they are carrying a gun are vanishingly small.
And you believe that your paranoia takes precedence over the other person's personal safety against criminal attack? The mere possession of a gun doesn't even begin to mean that you are in greater danger. In fact, at least here in the US, the possession of a gun by a law-abiding person substantially increases YOUR personals safety even if you don't carry one.

If my next-door neighbour is beating the shit out of his little son on his front lawn, I can intervene, and take my chances, knowing at least that he isn't going to emerge in a rage, holding a gun.
Or, you could have your own gun and use it if necessary to compel obedience and submission to arrest while you await the police.
The right to keep guns pervades all life in the US, and you are so used to it, you don't appreciate the benefits of not having it.
Forest/trees fallacy. Nobody needs a gun until and unless they need one, but when they come to need one, they need one right now. Not six hours from now carried by a specialized SWAT team as was the case in Port Arthur. Not sixty minutes from now as was also the case in Port Arthur. Not six minutes from now as is the case the majority of the time the police are called to respond to a critical incident. Not sixty second from now, which is how long it might take to retrieve a gun from a gun safe, assemble it and load it. Not six seconds from now, after your attacker has stabbed, beaten or shot you to death. Right. Fucking. Now. Maybe six-tenths of a second but even that is too long sometimes. It's always far better for you to have your gun, have it assembled and loaded and in firing ready position before the attacker is capable of commencing the attack.

If you could guarantee me that nobody I ever encounter is armed with any sort of weapon at all, including fists and feet, then I might feel comfortable not being armed. But so long as there is any chance at all that I might encounter an assailant intent on doing me great physical injury or killing me I will demand to be permitted to keep and bear arms for self defense. My doing so presents no risk to anyone other than such an attacker, so your paranoia about encountering an armed person is vacuous and irrational.

The only person who might be carrying a weapon of any kind you need to fear is a criminal intent on using it to harm you. Since it is utterly impossible for even you to predict which of the many people you come into contact with is actually intent on killing or harming you, and since it's far too late for you to go and get a defensive weapon once the attack has commenced, the only reasonable and rational course of action is to always be prepared to defend yourself. And to do that effectively, there is no better or more convenient tool available right now than a concealed handgun.

If you were to be carrying a gun, do you think that your fellow citizens would be thinking rationally by being afraid of you? If so, that means that you know you are unfit to carry a gun because you cannot be trusted to do so peaceably. According to the rhetoric here, no one on earth can be trusted to carry a gun peaceably...except the police and military perhaps.

That sounds quite paranoid and deranged to me. I encounter armed citizens all the time and have never has a problem with any of the law-abiding ones.

It's like living on a dung heap. After a while, you become totally unaware of the smell.
But visitors notice it straight away, and can't believe that you want to live like that.
It's better than living in mortal fear of every other person in your community, so much fear in fact that you don't trust them to act responsibly in carrying something as simple and non-lethal as OC spray or Mace.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by Seth » Sat Jan 31, 2015 6:17 pm

RESiNATE wrote:You seem to be an expert on everything, Seth 8-) I am impressed

And the answer to the physics question, Piscator?

Well, it seems that I am completely wrong about everything. Good, it means we can all live our lives safe in the knowledge that world governments have our very best interests at heart and that they do not have hidden agendas, either personal or global.
That's good news.

All those hours of research; all those conversations with certain people that I've had over the years; all those scientists and engineers that have offered counter-argument to the research and explanations that you cite, have been a total waste of time.

I feel so silly.
:banghead:
It's okay, ignorance can be dispelled, stupidity is permanent.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
piscator
Posts: 4725
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:11 am
Location: The Big BSOD
Contact:

Re: The Blinded Public

Post by piscator » Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:44 pm

RESiNATE wrote:
And the answer to the physics question, Piscator?

If you can't have a little fun with the arithmetic yourself, what's your basis for saying...
? :ask:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests