1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:23 am

MiM wrote:
JimC wrote:
MiM wrote:
JimC wrote:It sounds like MiM wants to define gamma rays as photons produced by events in a nucleus...
True, except that it is not me who wants to make that definition. While, I admit that there is no absolute consensus of how to define x- and gamma rays, one of the most used ways is exactly that.
What about the photons released by the mutual annihilation of electron-positron pairs? Non-nuclear, yet definitely gamma rays...
Cleverly put trap, you almost got me on that one. But strictly speaking that radiation has its own name (annihilation radiation/photons). But yes, I am prepared to accept those (and similar) as (annihilation) gamma in casual language.

On the other hand, what about the characteristic radiation coming from the K-shell of (say) a bismuth-214 atom, after the decay of led-214? It has energies ranging from 75-90 keV, which is roughly twice the cutoff you suggested, but they are surely still x-rays... At the same time the decay releases real gammas with a lower energy, than these x-rays.
Some gamma rays emitted by nuclear processes are actually way down in the UV range. On the other hand, some X-ray emitters can produce photons far more energetic than any photon emitted by nuclear decay. Also, the lower case gamma (γ) is used as shorthand for all photons in Feynman diagrams and elsewhere. In astronomy, however, all photons above a certain energy (roughly into the MeV range) are classed as gamma rays - mainly because their origin is uncertain.

So, like I said, fucked up terminology! It makes much more sense to me to classify photons based on energy rather than source. But will they listen? :nono:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by mistermack » Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:31 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:
MiM wrote:
JimC wrote:
MiM wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30491840

Pretty much every thunderstorm produces a burst of gamma radiation. So why aren't there more Hulks about? Answer that one, Darwin! :tea:
Because technically those are X-rays, not gamma. If they are called gamma-ray bursts, that would be because astronomers still confuse the two, by referring to fenomena that produce highly energetic X-rays, for gammabursts. :nono: I see no reason, why this confusion should be brought back here to planet earth.

And no-one has ever seen a Hulk produced by mere X-rays :smug:
If they have a frequency above 1019 Hz, then they are gamma rays, whatever their source...
Maybe back when you went to school, but not anymore :zilla: . Distingushing gamma and x-rays by source is the only sane way to distinguish them, as dividing them by frequency is completely arbitrary. But I do agree, that we would need a word for high energy photons, that would cover both.
What does it matter the source? Electromagnetic radiation is electromagnetic radiation. One photon differs from another only in wavelength/frequency/energy. Where they come from is irrelevant. :dunno:
Except for entangled pairs.
Something unique about them, which other seemingly identical particles haven't got ?
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:38 pm

mistermack wrote: Except for entangled pairs.
Something unique about them, which other seemingly identical particles haven't got ?
Interesting point. I suppose the answer is that that uniqueness is present only when the two particles are considered as a system. Individually they are identical to any other particle. There is no measurement you can take of a single particle that will reveal its entangled nature.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Thu Dec 18, 2014 7:40 pm

And, of course, there is no difference between entangled photons of 10MeV produced by a nuclear event and a pair produced otherwise.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
MiM
Man In The Middle
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by MiM » Thu Dec 18, 2014 8:39 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:And, of course, there is no difference between entangled photons of 10MeV produced by a nuclear event and a pair produced otherwise.
Which is why they have a common name "photons". What is your problem?
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - Richard Feynman

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by mistermack » Thu Dec 18, 2014 9:01 pm

You must be able to demonstrate entanglement, because it's been measured that the entangled pair changes instantly, to a very high degree of accuracy, as compared to the finite time that the speed of light would have taken. According to wiki.
But what I gather is that you can't do it live in real time. You can only demonstrate AFTERWARDS that it did happen, and happen instantly, as far as we can measure it.
So you can't pass a message that way faster than light, but you can demonstrate that particles are entangled.
The particles must be unique, because if you alter the spin of an entangled particle, the ONLY particle that is affected by that is it's pair. Other particles, that seem to be identical, can't be, because they aren't affected.

I think I read somewhere that every particle that exists might have an entangled pair particle somewhere in the Universe. To conserve the overall angular momentum etc of the universe to zero.
I have no idea if I'm remembering that right though.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60734
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by pErvinalia » Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:41 am

MiM wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:And, of course, there is no difference between entangled photons of 10MeV produced by a nuclear event and a pair produced otherwise.
Which is why they have a common name "photons". What is your problem?
He hasn't been wanking enough lately.. :tea:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Dec 19, 2014 2:22 am

MiM wrote:
Xamonas Chegwé wrote:And, of course, there is no difference between entangled photons of 10MeV produced by a nuclear event and a pair produced otherwise.
Which is why they have a common name "photons". What is your problem?
I don't have a problem. Except for the fact that every other name for a type of photon: radio wave, IR, UV, visible light, etc. refers to a specific range of frequencies. That gamma rays and x-rays don't (except to astronomers!) is kinda perverse. :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Dec 19, 2014 2:24 am

mistermack wrote:You must be able to demonstrate entanglement, because it's been measured that the entangled pair changes instantly, to a very high degree of accuracy, as compared to the finite time that the speed of light would have taken. According to wiki.
But what I gather is that you can't do it live in real time. You can only demonstrate AFTERWARDS that it did happen, and happen instantly, as far as we can measure it.
So you can't pass a message that way faster than light, but you can demonstrate that particles are entangled.
The particles must be unique, because if you alter the spin of an entangled particle, the ONLY particle that is affected by that is it's pair. Other particles, that seem to be identical, can't be, because they aren't affected.

I think I read somewhere that every particle that exists might have an entangled pair particle somewhere in the Universe. To conserve the overall angular momentum etc of the universe to zero.
I have no idea if I'm remembering that right though.
So, if every particle in the universe is entangled with another particle, there is certainly nothing special about entangled particles! :biggrin:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by laklak » Fri Dec 19, 2014 2:27 am

You can make torpedoes out of protons.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74151
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by JimC » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:59 am

laklak wrote:You can make torpedoes out of protons.
Are you positive about that?
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by mistermack » Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:36 am

I find entanglement really fascinating.

I think it's big evidence for a fifth dimension, as it's effects exceed the limits on matter and energy in the four dimensions that we experience.

So in a way, photons can be identical in the four dimensions that we know. But all bets are off for other dimensions.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Dec 19, 2014 7:07 pm

mistermack wrote:I find entanglement really fascinating.

I think it's big evidence for a fifth dimension, as it's effects exceed the limits on matter and energy in the four dimensions that we experience.

So in a way, photons can be identical in the four dimensions that we know. But all bets are off for other dimensions.
Personally, I find entanglement to be suggestive of the de Broglie-Bohm theory. Basically that particles do have definite position and momentum at all times but that those properties are guided probabilistically by a wavefunction pilot-wave and thus cannot be predicted from initial conditions.
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by mistermack » Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:22 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote: Personally, I find entanglement to be suggestive of the de Broglie-Bohm theory. Basically that particles do have definite position and momentum at all times but that those properties are guided probabilistically by a wavefunction pilot-wave and thus cannot be predicted from initial conditions.
That's quite interesting, although a lot of it is over the top of my head on first reading.
One thing I did find interesting though, was
wikipedia wrote:The theory is deterministic.[1] Most (but not all) variants of the theory that support special relativity require a preferred frame.
I've always felt that even though relativity works for any frame, that there probably is a preferred frame.
But whenever I mentioned the possibility, I got howls of derision. Usually from people who know very little, but manage to absorb that one headline fact, that there is no preferred frame in relativity.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: 1100 gamma ray bursts a day on Earth!

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:33 pm

I'm not saying that Bohm interpretation is right. But entanglement does lend it credence. Apparently, it is gaining weight again at the moment after decades of dismissal. I suspect that the "truth" is somewhat weirder though. And I don't hold with a preferred frame - simply because the maths don't require one. Doesn't mean that there isn't one. But why add a flying, purple elephant to your equations if they work fine without it?
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests