Fuck how many times do you need to be told....C02 can be be both a feedback and a forcing.And how the hell can you not know by now, that historical CO2 levels FOLLOW temperature, rather than lead it?
In other words, CO2 rises and falls with ocean temperatures, quite naturally, because the ocean holds more in solution more when it's cold?
Or did you forget?
YOU are describing a feedback where there is no source of additional C02 outside of the carbon cycle.
WE have put in 40% more C02 from fossil fuel burning into that cycle.
That is a forcing
If you can't even comprehend basics then stop pretending your assinine denial is science based, it's not.
It's ignorance based.
How many times does this need to be presented to you....
moreCO2 as a Feedback and Forcing in the Climate System
Zeke Hausfather —
A fundamental misconception about the role that carbon dioxide plays in glacial transitions has helped fuel the argument that the lag time between temperature and CO2 in the paleoclimate record casts doubt on carbon dioxide as an important greenhouse gas.
It’s crucial that media reporting on climate change understand an important distinction between the dual roles of greenhouse gases as both forcings and feedbacks.
In the geologic past, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases acted primarily as feedbacks to external climate forcings. Our current and basically unprecedented experience is that we as humans are directly emitting carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that affect climate change.
That distinction – greenhouse gases as both forcings and feedbacks – is critical in understanding the behavior of these gases in the paleoclimatic and present periods.
http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2 ... te-system/
A fundamental misconception.....EXACTLY what you exhibit and you repeat the same error over and over......

Move on to something you might have a faint hope of understanding...like what you ate for breakfast....you should be up for that.....tho one wonders at times.
