I think it's when you want to re-load spent cartridges, centre fire at least...mistermack wrote:What the fuck are primers? I thought bullets were one-piece these days?
Not that I know much about that shite.
Waste not, want not...
I think it's when you want to re-load spent cartridges, centre fire at least...mistermack wrote:What the fuck are primers? I thought bullets were one-piece these days?
Not that I know much about that shite.
Sounds a bit laborious. Why not just save up spent cartridges and trade them in when you get new ones?JimC wrote:I think it's when you want to re-load spent cartridges, centre fire at least...mistermack wrote:What the fuck are primers? I thought bullets were one-piece these days?
Not that I know much about that shite.
Waste not, want not...
The real fanatics like to re-load with great care, accurately measuring powder etc., claiming a more accurate result...mistermack wrote:Sounds a bit laborious. Why not just save up spent cartridges and trade them in when you get new ones?JimC wrote:I think it's when you want to re-load spent cartridges, centre fire at least...mistermack wrote:What the fuck are primers? I thought bullets were one-piece these days?
Not that I know much about that shite.
Waste not, want not...
Yeh, they need to save themselves from house invasions and muggers at extremely long range.JimC wrote: The real fanatics like to re-load with great care, accurately measuring powder etc., claiming a more accurate result...
Every man needs a hobby...
Look at the back end of a cartridge (not bullet, that's the projectile) and you'll see a little round flat-topped button. That's the primer, and it's what sets off the powder charge.mistermack wrote:What the fuck are primers? I thought bullets were one-piece these days?
Not that I know much about that shite.
It's more than a claim. Each rifle is different, and true marksmen "tune" their load to their rifle to obtain the best possible consistency and grouping. I used to do it a lot, but haven't lately. I worked up a load for my .243 for prairie dogs shooting with my Sako action and barrel. It took 200 rounds to find the right combination of case preparation, primer selection, powder type, powder amount, bullet design and weight and seating depth to find the best combination, which resulted in a decrease in size of my groups at 300 yards from 1/2 MOA (1.5 inches) to 1/6 MOA (0.47 inches) for my average grouping. The really good shooters put the projectile through the same hole often enough that at competitions they have a moving paper tape mechanism behind the bullseye to ensure that all shots were fired and went through the same hole.JimC wrote:The real fanatics like to re-load with great care, accurately measuring powder etc., claiming a more accurate result...mistermack wrote:Sounds a bit laborious. Why not just save up spent cartridges and trade them in when you get new ones?JimC wrote:I think it's when you want to re-load spent cartridges, centre fire at least...mistermack wrote:What the fuck are primers? I thought bullets were one-piece these days?
Not that I know much about that shite.
Waste not, want not...
Every man needs a hobby...
Probably not. If the residents of the community had been determined to fight off the Boko Haram when they came calling. But they couldn't even try, because they didn't have any guns.rainbow wrote:Of course none of this would've happened if guns were freely available in Northern Nigeria.
Even in a country with few personal weapons, as long as there is strong, competent government and law enforcement, both sadly lacking in Nigeria...Seth wrote:Probably not. If the residents of the community had been determined to fight off the Boko Haram when they came calling. But they couldn't even try, because they didn't have any guns.rainbow wrote:Of course none of this would've happened if guns were freely available in Northern Nigeria.
I would note that Boko Haram has not attempted to kidnap 300 girls in the United States. I suspect there's a reason for that that's at least partially related to how quickly they would get dead if they tried.
Strong government and law enforcement and competent government and law enforcement are oxymoronic because power corrupts. The greater the power (strength) of either, the more corrupt they become.JimC wrote:Even in a country with few personal weapons, as long as there is strong, competent government and law enforcement, both sadly lacking in Nigeria...Seth wrote:Probably not. If the residents of the community had been determined to fight off the Boko Haram when they came calling. But they couldn't even try, because they didn't have any guns.rainbow wrote:Of course none of this would've happened if guns were freely available in Northern Nigeria.
I would note that Boko Haram has not attempted to kidnap 300 girls in the United States. I suspect there's a reason for that that's at least partially related to how quickly they would get dead if they tried.
Boko Haram exists as a threat BECAUSE nobody else in Nigeria is armed...except the army, which looks after the interests of the government, not the people.JimC wrote:Tell that to Boko Haram...
This shows how completely ignorant you are of both history and philosophy.mistermack wrote:The US constitution was written for a country that had many places where no law existed, and where the guns weren't much more effective than bows and arrows.
There are in fact many pearls of wisdom in the bible. There's also a lot of swill.You might as well quote the bible, for pearls of wisdom.
Well, yeah, but then again we've got the guns and the most powerful military in the world, so fuck you, we'll do as we please.The morons in the US are still worshiping both.
Army and police may well be impotent in Nigeria, but that would not be the case in many other places in the world.Seth wrote:Boko Haram exists as a threat BECAUSE nobody else in Nigeria is armed...except the army, which looks after the interests of the government, not the people.JimC wrote:Tell that to Boko Haram...
Quod erat demonstrandum.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests