rainbow wrote:I still can't understand why they don't make black boxes that float.
Anyone?
There's absolutely no need.rEvolutionist wrote:MM should design one.
Just design one that doesn't sink.
rainbow wrote:I still can't understand why they don't make black boxes that float.
Anyone?
There's absolutely no need.rEvolutionist wrote:MM should design one.
mistermack wrote:
Just design one that doesn't sink.
How would you plan on making something less dense than water that can also survive a plane crash?rainbow wrote:I still can't understand why they don't make black boxes that float.
Anyone?
Apparently Navy planes have been doing this part for years.PsychoSerenity wrote:It could sort of be done, but it would have to involve a system that automatically ejects the flight recorder before the crash.
I think they could soon get that cost down, if they made it obligatory, and put the software job out to tender.macdoc wrote:The tech was already on the plane
It costs $10 per flight for the software licence - Malayasia AIr decided to skip that cost.
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/09/world ... ?hpt=hp_t1Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: 2 new signals in search area buoys hope
By Ed Payne and Greg Botelho, CNN
April 9, 2014 -- Updated 0413 GMT (1213 HKT)
If pingers only transmitted at restricted times, searches would be limited to just those times. That's because their range of transmission under water is 25 kilometres at best. Search vehicles would have to stop sweeping an area until the next time pinging is expected to occur.mistermack wrote:The other thing that I would have thought that they would have done, would be to design the boxes to only ping at certain times. If they only pinged at midday and midnight, UTC time, then the batteries would last much longer, and there would be greater certainty about the signal actually coming from a black box.
If they were picking up signals at 2:45 UTC, then that would tell them that there was something else, making a false but similar ping.
If the ping that they heard started dead on midday or midnight, then it's a strong indication that it's the actual boxes.
Perhaps ping all the time, but also double the rate for half an hour at the times mm suggested?Hermit wrote:If pingers only transmitted at restricted times, searches would be limited to just those times. That's because their range of transmission under water is 25 kilometres at best. Search vehicles would have to stop sweeping an area until the next time pinging is expected to occur.mistermack wrote:The other thing that I would have thought that they would have done, would be to design the boxes to only ping at certain times. If they only pinged at midday and midnight, UTC time, then the batteries would last much longer, and there would be greater certainty about the signal actually coming from a black box.
If they were picking up signals at 2:45 UTC, then that would tell them that there was something else, making a false but similar ping.
If the ping that they heard started dead on midday or midnight, then it's a strong indication that it's the actual boxes.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests