Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

User avatar
klr
(%gibber(who=klr, what=Leprageek);)
Posts: 32964
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:25 pm
About me: The money was just resting in my account.
Location: Airstrip Two
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by klr » Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:03 pm

As April Fool's jokes go ... not bad.

Although the Finns might not appreciate it. :mob:
God has no place within these walls, just like facts have no place within organized religion. - Superintendent Chalmers

It's not up to us to choose which laws we want to obey. If it were, I'd kill everyone who looked at me cock-eyed! - Rex Banner

The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression. - Gary Larson

:mob: :comp: :mob:

User avatar
FBM
Ratz' first Gritizen.
Posts: 45327
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:43 pm
About me: Skeptic. "Because it does not contend
It is therefore beyond reproach"
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by FBM » Fri Apr 04, 2014 12:15 am

FBM wrote:HuffPo and other reputable sources have picked up on it: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03 ... reloaded=1
Huffington Post UK | Posted: 30/03/2014 14:15 BST | Updated: 30/03/2014 22:59 BST
"A philosopher is a blind man in a dark room looking for a black cat that isn't there. A theologian is the man who finds it." ~ H. L. Mencken

"We ain't a sharp species. We kill each other over arguments about what happens when you die, then fail to see the fucking irony in that."

"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions in favor of vegetarianism while the wolf remains of a different opinion."

User avatar
SteveB
Nibbler
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
About me: The more you change the less you feel
Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by SteveB » Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:20 am

Good, I want more worldwide instability! I'm heavily invested in gold. :demon:
Twit, twat, twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged! :(

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by mistermack » Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:49 am

Tero wrote:It never goes well when Russia goes on a Finland expedition without nukes.
The Finnish resistance is overrated. That war happened shortly after comrade Stalin had tens of thousands of the top officers purged from the red army, the morale and organisation at the time were zero.

Why would you want to fight the Finns, when you could get executed for no reason at any moment? It's not nice being an unwelcome invader anyway, I would just want to keep my head down, and survive till it was over.

The Russians fought very well, when they were defending their own country.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51462
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 8-34-20
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by Tero » Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:36 am

Wars in the Russian territory were simpler. Lots of it was treeless farmland, tanks could move freely, finland was bad for tanks. Trees and rocks.

User avatar
mistermack
Posts: 15093
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
About me: Never rong.
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by mistermack » Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:45 am

Tero wrote:Wars in the Russian territory were simpler. Lots of it was treeless farmland, tanks could move freely, Finland was bad for tanks. Trees and rocks.
Stalingrad was similar, with rubble instead of trees and rocks, but the Russkis fought really well there.
It's just a question of organisation and motivation.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.

Babel
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:22 am
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by Babel » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:02 am

Tero wrote:Wars in the Russian territory were simpler. Lots of it was treeless farmland, tanks could move freely, finland was bad for tanks. Trees and rocks.
and a lake here and there.

User avatar
MiM
Man In The Middle
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by MiM » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:34 am

JimC wrote:It would be interesting to hear MiM's views on this...
Oh, missed this thread completely...

No, that is not an April fools joke, and nothing anybody would make such of over here right now. That piece of news is true, and is cited also in reputable press over here. On the other hand, this Illarionov isn't among Putins best buddies anymore (far from, asfaik), so what he says should maybe not be taken too seriously.

There are even more haywire writings in some Russian papers, even making claims that there is serious discussion in Finland about voluntarily joining Russia. There has also been a long smearing campaign in the Russian press, claiming things like "Russian parents are specifically targeted by child protection in Finland, and their kids are taken away from them for almost no reason at all". This campaign has been fueled by one Finnish citizen Johan Bäckman, and whatever groups in Russia that he works with. The situation has become quite ugly at times, with high level Russian political attempts to interfere in Finnish sovereignty (not that we aren't used to that), e.g. by demanding things like "joint Russian/Finnish cooperation boards on child protection issues".

And yes, Russia has built up its troops against the Finnish border for some time already, as it has everywhere. And yes, there is a very serious discussion in Finland about joining Nato or not. Simplifying, there are two main views:

- Finland has a long history of being a "good neighbor" with Russia, which has benefited both countries, especially economically, through good trade relationships. Russia does not have anything to benefit from invading Finland, or harming this relationship in any way. Finland can only loose from changing this status quo, and should not take steps that would irritate Russia (so no Nato for us).

- Russia can never be completely trusted, and the only way for Finland to get security against a possibly expansive Russia is through joining Nato, which anyway is a natural part of the western world we belong to.

One interesting question (that I have not seen raised) is: If Russia would try to expand in Northern Europe, would it start from the Baltic countries, that were part of the Soviet Union, and has significant Russian minorities - but are NATO members. Or would it start from Finland, that has a longer history of independence, and only a few tens of thousand Russian speakers - but is not a part of a military alliance?

And yes, the Finnish efforts in WWII were heroic (as were the Russian in Stalingrad), and we still have a strong will to defend our country, even with weapons, be it so. We still have a conscription army, with every male being drafted for military service (for 1/2 to 1 year, and subsequent training). Also women can join (completely voluntary), and there is also a possibility for men to do a 1 year civil service instead.
Last edited by MiM on Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:54 am, edited 3 times in total.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - Richard Feynman

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41100
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by Svartalf » Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:44 am

Finland is not a NATO member? wow... I had assumed it was a part of it, precisely because it's too close to a guy that still holds half of what should be Finnish national territory (Karelia) to feel safe without the US nuclear shield...
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
MiM
Man In The Middle
Posts: 5459
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Putin 'wants to regain Finland' for Russia

Post by MiM » Fri Apr 04, 2014 7:10 am

Oh, and viewed from a Finnish standpoint (and quite objectively, also), Finland has never been a part of Russia. Finland was a part of Sweden until 1809, and after that a Grand Dutchy under the Russian Zar, with large autonomy, until getting full independence in 1917. Even the Russian ruble was used here for only 25 years (1840-1865), preceded by the Swedish riksdaler and followed by our own currency, the Finnish markka. Swedish, and later Finnish were the languages of governance, and with the Russian overlords French was often used.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Finland

Svarty: Karelia wasn't even close to half the Finnish territory, but yes, that hurt. And when the Soviet Union fell, there was quite strong voices here demanding "Karelia back from the Russians". That was obviously never realistic. I actually have some understanding for Russia not wanting a border to the west, 20 km from St:Petersbug.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - Richard Feynman

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests