if you start it, I will post in it!JimC wrote:Does Ratskep have a "Rationalia, lol" thread?
If not, it should!
And I should have a starring roll!

if you start it, I will post in it!JimC wrote:Does Ratskep have a "Rationalia, lol" thread?
If not, it should!
And I should have a starring roll!
I am not a sycophant or a wannabe at all and am perfectly happy being myself. Nor do I hero worship Cito and neither support or do not support moderator decisionsrEvolutionist wrote:
In my view you are a weaselling sycophant like so many other wannabe's there. It's basically a forum devoted to hero worship and irrational support of the
moderators/admins despite all the evidence to the contrary. That's why it has descended into pretty much farce in the last few years, and will continue to
do so. If only I could source a new IP address I'd help it on it's way
It's funny how it's turned around on you now, after your unsuccessful attempt to claim that I talk about ratskep all the time. The irony of it all is that pretty much every second or third post of yours that I've read in the last couple of years has mentioned Cito or Hack. You absolutely worship them! And the fact that you actually think Cito has anything intelligent to contribute to philosophical and scientific discussion pretty much nails that (my) assessment.surreptitious57 wrote:I am not a sycophant or a wannabe at all and am perfectly happy being myself. Nor do I hero worship CitorEvolutionist wrote:
In my view you are a weaselling sycophant like so many other wannabe's there. It's basically a forum devoted to hero worship and irrational support of the
moderators/admins despite all the evidence to the contrary. That's why it has descended into pretty much farce in the last few years, and will continue to
do so. If only I could source a new IP address I'd help it on it's way
It's funny how cocksure you are of your pronouncements, despite knowing virtually nothing about me.In the event of her passing then I may go over to one of the other two
serious sites and carry on from there. You in the meantime will remain here still telling anyone who will listen that Rat Skep left you when in actual fact you left her
by being unfaithful which is why she will never have you back.
Amusing tale, but detached from reality. I'm not particularly surprised by that.I think she should have you back because you are so lovesick without her but unfortunately that is not
a decision I can make for you. If I could I would and contrary to what you say you would run back into her open arms without a seconds thought as you still love her
And probably always will too if truth be told though learning to let go would be the lesser of two evils in my humble opinion. But its your choice to make not mine
...at the cost of exporting everyone and anyone who disagrees with anything. That is neither beautiful nor shining.Robert_S wrote:For all their numerous faults, the A+ ers did one thing right. One brilliant beautiful shining thing: They made a rule against importing drama.
Do you care to provide evidence that that particular rule was used to "export" anyone? Are you just saying that because you're scared of being suspected of not hating them enough?Hermit wrote:...at the cost of exporting everyone and anyone who disagrees with anything. That is neither beautiful nor shining.Robert_S wrote:For all their numerous faults, the A+ ers did one thing right. One brilliant beautiful shining thing: They made a rule against importing drama.
Oh fuck off. You really are a prat.Robert_S wrote:For all their numerous faults, the A+ ers did one thing right. One brilliant beautiful shining thing: They made a rule against importing drama.
Coming from you, that means very little.rEvolutionist wrote:Oh fuck off. You really are a prat.Robert_S wrote:For all their numerous faults, the A+ ers did one thing right. One brilliant beautiful shining thing: They made a rule against importing drama.
No. Two reasons: 1. You are asking someone with not a great enough care factor about A+. 2. I never said nor implied that "that particular rule was used to "export" anyone".Robert_S wrote:Do you care to provide evidence that that particular rule was used to "export" anyone?Hermit wrote:...at the cost of exporting everyone and anyone who disagrees with anything. That is neither beautiful nor shining.Robert_S wrote:For all their numerous faults, the A+ ers did one thing right. One brilliant beautiful shining thing: They made a rule against importing drama.
Scared of what someone might think of me? Yeah. Right. Also, where do you get the idea from that I hate "them"?Robert_S wrote:Are you just saying that because you're scared of being suspected of not hating them enough?
You said "at the cost of" which implies causation.Hermit wrote:No. Two reasons: 1. You are asking someone with not a great enough care factor about A+. 2. I never said nor implied that "that particular rule was used to "export" anyone".Robert_S wrote:Do you care to provide evidence that that particular rule was used to "export" anyone?Hermit wrote:...at the cost of exporting everyone and anyone who disagrees with anything. That is neither beautiful nor shining.Robert_S wrote:For all their numerous faults, the A+ ers did one thing right. One brilliant beautiful shining thing: They made a rule against importing drama.Scared of what someone might think of me? Yeah. Right. Also, where do you get the idea from that I hate "them"?Robert_S wrote:Are you just saying that because you're scared of being suspected of not hating them enough?
You're a mod now?rEvolutionist wrote:Coming from someone who refuses to contribute positively to this forum, that means precisely fuck all. Go crawl back under your rock.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests