Rationalskepiticism,lol.

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Robert_S » Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:02 am

DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:Not even remotely true.
Aren't you the disingenuous fuckwit, if Blip would have delivered the banhammer then so be it. Though 'The_Metatron' who ignored me being called an asshole then banned me because of what I posted about shrunk (who I now believe wasn't petty enough to report me.) Just because I showed him to be a delusional cunt in that thread. Though fuck me right just because I'm capable of holding opinions that are not the norm in your fascist dictatorship. Feel free to have a wank over the fact that a difference of opinion wasn't allowed to see the light of day (slow hand clap.) God forbid some people choose to not be sheep in the atheist/skeptical 'community' as they are obvious guilty of bad thoughts.

Still how about you show anything I said to be out of order in the censorship free Rationalia. I'm game, no big brother here. Go for it; give it your best shot because I'm calling you a intellectual maggot so lets have at it.
:hehe: Irony. You can't even post within the rules here.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60724
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:02 am

:lol:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Bella Fortuna » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:07 pm

:hehe: Indeed. :roll:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Robert_S » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:33 pm

rEvolutionist wrote::lol:
Wat's so funny?

:{D

This thread and your RatSkep threads would be a laughing stock if they weren't so pathetic and sad.
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74146
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by JimC » Sat Feb 08, 2014 10:29 pm

DaveDodo007, this post: http://www.rationalia.com/forum/viewtop ... 8#p1539678

contains personal attacks against another member. Given some earlier reminders, this is a warning that any repetition will result in a suspension.
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Audley Strange » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:17 am

Winston Smith LOVED Big Brother. :hehe:
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Scott1328
Posts: 1140
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Scott1328 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:36 am

Anyone is free to go have a look at what led to Dave's multiple suspensions. They can draw their own conclusions as have I, but don't dare to post a contrary opinion lest he face the wrath of Dave, who alone among humans on the internet cannot be contradicted.

Fuck that, I am off to RatSkep, where I can play word association to my heart's content :tongue:

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:17 pm

Robert_S wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Scott1328 wrote:Not even remotely true.
Aren't you the disingenuous fuckwit, if Blip would have delivered the banhammer then so be it. Though 'The_Metatron' who ignored me being called an asshole then banned me because of what I posted about shrunk (who I now believe wasn't petty enough to report me.) Just because I showed him to be a delusional cunt in that thread. Though fuck me right just because I'm capable of holding opinions that are not the norm in your fascist dictatorship. Feel free to have a wank over the fact that a difference of opinion wasn't allowed to see the light of day (slow hand clap.) God forbid some people choose to not be sheep in the atheist/skeptical 'community' as they are obvious guilty of bad thoughts.

Still how about you show anything I said to be out of order in the censorship free Rationalia. I'm game, no big brother here. Go for it; give it your best shot because I'm calling you a intellectual maggot so lets have at it.
:hehe: Irony. You can't even post within the rules here.
I can, I just choose not to in this case and this is no disrespect to Pappa and Co whom have a light touch when it comes to moderation. I'm just fed up with intellectual pigmies running to the mod when they can't defend their bullshit.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:18 pm

Robert_S wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote::lol:
Wat's so funny?

:{D

This thread and your RatSkep threads would be a laughing stock if they weren't so pathetic and sad.
Feel free to point out the 'laughing stock' part as I'm all ears.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Jason » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:27 pm

Well.. you misspelled 'Pygmies'.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:32 pm

Scott1328 wrote:Anyone is free to go have a look at what led to Dave's multiple suspensions. They can draw their own conclusions as have I, but don't dare to post a contrary opinion lest he face the wrath of Dave, who alone among humans on the internet cannot be contradicted.

Fuck that, I am off to RatSkep, where I can play word association to my heart's content :tongue:
I don't regret anything I posted in that thread and I defended any positions I held against all comers and all I got back was typical shaming shit with no added substance. Second most popular thread (fucking stoners) even after such a short time so a lot of people are reading it and nobody has posted in it since 23rd Dec. There is a paradigm shift going on in the Western world but feel free to bury your head in the sand. Skeptics and atheists make me laugh as they are the first to laugh at creationist but will never let reason or evidence get in the way of ideas that they hold dear.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:36 pm

Făkünamę wrote:Well.. you misspelled 'Pygmies'.
Hey, if i don't see a wiggly red line underneath my words then I run with it.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sun Feb 09, 2014 11:48 pm

Audley Strange wrote:Winston Smith LOVED Big Brother. :hehe:
Only after the rats, I fucking hate rats; especially the ones in human form.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60724
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by pErvinalia » Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:52 am

Robert_S wrote:
rEvolutionist wrote::lol:
Wat's so funny?

:{D

This thread and your RatSkep threads would be a laughing stock if they weren't so pathetic and sad.
I know what I am, but what are you?!? :lay:
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Rationalskepiticism,lol.

Post by Hermit » Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:46 pm

Făkünamę wrote:Well.. you misspelled 'Pygmies'.
.. and what's with 'whom'?

As for that forum, I could never get very enthusiastic about posting there. Though I've never been the target of disciplinary action myself*, I totally loathe the conduct of those prefects with swagger sticks.

*Admittedly, I was given a formal warning once, in the forum that retchup is a copy of, but that was after I called one of the mods a Kommissar. Three times. :hehe: The target of my jibe eventually suffered a similar fate as met most political kommissars under Stalin. While defending the powers that were to her last breath her role was unceremoniously terminated.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests