For Reason and Science?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
Pappa
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Non-Practicing Anarchist
Posts: 56488
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:42 am
About me: I am sacrificing a turnip as I type.
Location: Le sud du Pays de Galles.
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Pappa » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:16 am

lordpasternack wrote:Subject: RD.net to be re-revamped!
lordpasternack wrote: Things are now developing in interesting ways within RDF, and rippling into the wider Freethought community… I may not actually be able to say much for quite some time yet, but rather interesting things are happening…

Sean Faircloth is following me on Twitter. I hardly even use Twitter, but that's besides the point.

And Robin Elisabeth Cornwell and Mike Cornwell have been removed from the list of staff on RD.net.

It's impossible to gauge precisely what these things mean - but, interesting developments are still happening, and the theme tune of this thread is hereby upgraded:

Why is the "wider Freethought community" considered significant in any way? The phrase tends to mean "noisy bloggers" mostly.

User avatar
Calilasseia
Butterfly
Butterfly
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Calilasseia » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:29 am

In the meantime ... if ever I'm in a position of public prominence, remind me to tread carefully within said position until my dick is dead. :mrgreen:

User avatar
Brian Peacock
Tipping cows since 1946
Posts: 39826
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 11:44 am
About me: Ablate me:
Location: Location: Location:
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Brian Peacock » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:35 am

:lol: Yeah, don't do a 'Clinton.'
Rationalia relies on voluntary donations. There is no obligation of course, but if you value this place and want to see it continue please consider making a small donation towards the forum's running costs.
Details on how to do that can be found here.

.

"It isn't necessary to imagine the world ending in fire or ice.
There are two other possibilities: one is paperwork, and the other is nostalgia."

Frank Zappa

"This is how humanity ends; bickering over the irrelevant."
Clinton Huxley » 21 Jun 2012 » 14:10:36 GMT
.

User avatar
Calilasseia
Butterfly
Butterfly
Posts: 5272
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:31 pm
About me: Destroyer of canards, and merciless shredder of bad ideas. :twisted:
Location: 40,000 feet above you, dropping JDAMs
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Calilasseia » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:37 am

Or worse, still, a David Mellor ... :lol:

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Hermit » Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:43 am

Brian Peacock wrote::lol: Yeah, don't do a 'Clinton.'
Hey, Clinton is a victim of a misunderstanding. What he actually said is: "Monica, sack my cook."
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Feb 19, 2014 12:23 am

When the fuck is this gonna blow up, we could do with some drama around here; imagine the click bait that would give us. Normally anyone criticizing Dawkins gets 1,000s of comments and even more views, yet still nothing. Lp could be naked with a sign saying Richie's foundation is a con whilst giving blowjobs to the heads of all the main stream media and we still wouldn't catch a break. When did we become the unfashionable part of the internet? Fess up who is wearing crocs? It's not fair. :lay:
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60663
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by pErvinalia » Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:01 am

:hehe: Yeah, I think a bit of drama could do wonders for here. Can't you make some really out there allegations, LP?
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by lordpasternack » Wed Feb 19, 2014 3:17 am

If and when it blows up, it probably won't reach here. Even I'll be a step removed from it, if I can help it.

I'm really focusing on preparing a comprehensive referral to the IRS just now - before possibly handing the full story as I understand it, to the media.

And I'd specifically be seeking an investigative journalist with some kind of decent reputation, to break the story to and liase with, if I were to go ahead with that. If I am to be actively involved in the story hitting the media - I would want the story to be done properly before the redtops run with it.

And that's why it's not happening quickly.

I think that that should simultaneously give Dawkins solace and makes his palms sweat. I have too much class to take a quick, half-arsed, sensationalised hatchet job to the media - but if and when it does hit the press, it will be authoritative and thorough.

He is simultaneously lucky and seriously unlucky that I have strong principles, and am thoroughly honest. But then he knew that right from the start, and that's part of the reason why he's always felt ambivalent about me - why he's flitted so much between being chummy with me, and telling people that I'm a shrieking harpy. The things that he admires most about me are also the things that he's feared most about me, since he first became aware of me.

I challenge authority and I take no prisoners - and if I were up against anyone else, Dawkins would likely be cheerleading from the sidelines. But as it happens, people were never supposed to challenge him with such attitudes, nor ask him for evidence - and he was supposed to get away with all his "secret agenda" nonsense with nary a peep from anyone. He was simply supposed to get away with everything. There was no Plan B. He couldn't be doing with with someone like me.

I can tell that he felt and still feels that he is not supposed to be held accountable, nor to incur actual real-world consequences for his actions and omissions - and to be honest that's one of my main motivations for, well, taking no prisoners - at least where the IRS is concerned...

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74091
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:41 am

:pop:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
Xamonas Chegwé
Bouncer
Bouncer
Posts: 50939
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:23 pm
About me: I have prehensile eyebrows.
I speak 9 languages fluently, one of which other people can also speak.
When backed into a corner, I fit perfectly - having a right-angled arse.
Location: Nottingham UK
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Xamonas Chegwé » Wed Feb 19, 2014 4:47 am

If only he'd let you suck his dick, LP. Things would have gone so much better for him. Now he's going to get the full butt-reaming treatment with nary a drop of vaseline. :tea:
A book is a version of the world. If you do not like it, ignore it; or offer your own version in return.
Salman Rushdie
You talk to God, you're religious. God talks to you, you're psychotic.
House MD
Who needs a meaning anyway, I'd settle anyday for a very fine view.
Sandy Denny
This is the wrong forum for bluffing :nono:
Paco
Yes, yes. But first I need to show you this venomous fish!
Calilasseia
I think we should do whatever Pawiz wants.
Twoflower
Bella squats momentarily then waddles on still peeing, like a horse
Millefleur

User avatar
JimC
The sentimental bloke
Posts: 74091
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 7:58 am
About me: To be serious about gin requires years of dedicated research.
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by JimC » Wed Feb 19, 2014 8:35 am

As he started to write "The Selfish Gene", did he see the future?

Did the words "What does it really taste like" flash before his eyes?

Poor old bugger... :nono:
Nurse, where the fuck's my cardigan?
And my gin!

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by lordpasternack » Thu Feb 20, 2014 1:47 pm

Xamonas Chegwé wrote:If only he'd let you suck his dick, LP. Things would have gone so much better for him. Now he's going to get the full butt-reaming treatment with nary a drop of vaseline. :tea:
Insofar as sucking his dick might have been a good broker for diplomacy, and might have made him more inclined to fucking LISTEN... yes. :tea:

Although, that strategy apparently never worked for Paula Kirby - so we can't be sure. ;)
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
Rum
Absent Minded Processor
Posts: 37285
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by Rum » Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:15 pm

Anyone seen Brett A around lately?

User avatar
lordpasternack
Divine Knob Twiddler
Posts: 6459
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:05 am
About me: I have remarkable elbows.
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by lordpasternack » Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:27 pm

I want to add - not that I have to justify myself, but just to say - that another, more important reason why I'm taking no prisoners is that I suspect Robin Elisabeth Cornwell of knowingly committing fraud. I suspect that NBGA was set up as a con, right from the outset. I think that Cornwell was most interested in proving, to herself, that atheists are just as gullible, credulous, and disinclined to seek evidence, as their religious counterparts. And I'm both proud and ashamed that I was likely the only one who got in her way.

Following from that - I think that RDF is far too fucking incompetent to launch a proper independent investigation into the situation, and they're probably looking to reach some sort of hush-hush legal agreement with the Cornwells in order to avoid formal litigation or criminal proceedings - which RDF probably can't afford, and which could backfire on RDF if the facts came to light.

That is, I suspect RE Cornwell of knowingly committing fraud, and that RDF probably know as much by now - but are more interested in sweeping it under the carpet than pursuing justice.

Moreover, I suspect that Cornwell has done this all before, and has got away with it all before, for much the same reasons. Everything about her personality, and particularly her preoccupation with projecting financial crimes onto others, suggests as much to me.

So, I believe that Cornwell has knowingly committed fraud, and that RDF are unwilling and most definitely unable to investigate properly and hold her to account. And I believe that Cornwell has been through this exact scenario before, probably more than once - and she's never been held to account.

And I believe that the best way to bring about a proper investigation, and potentially proper consequences for ALL parties concerned, is to call in the IRS.
Then they for sudden joy did weep,
And I for sorrow sung,
That such a king should play bo-peep,
And go the fools among.
Prithee, nuncle, keep a schoolmaster that can teach
thy fool to lie: I would fain learn to lie.

User avatar
pErvinalia
On the good stuff
Posts: 60663
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:08 pm
About me: Spelling 'were' 'where'
Location: dystopia
Contact:

Re: For Reason and Science?

Post by pErvinalia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:29 pm

Hey, LP, do you want to join forces with me in bringing down Ratskep?
Sent from my penis using wankertalk.
"The Western world is fucking awesome because of mostly white men" - DaveDodo007.
"Socialized medicine is just exactly as morally defensible as gassing and cooking Jews" - Seth. Yes, he really did say that..
"Seth you are a boon to this community" - Cunt.
"I am seriously thinking of going on a spree killing" - Svartalf.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests