Expressed in simple terms, he said broad agreement on tax and spending between the nations sharing the currency would be needed.
No problem, says the Scottish government. We can do such a deal.
Indeed. You'll notice Carney didn't say there couldn't or wouldn't be a currency union. And neither, despite all the opportunities and rhetoric, has Gideon (or Balls). Odd, no?
Big problem says the Treasury. We're not so sure.
Well, I'm shocked. Politicians against independence suggest independence not good. As Mervin King supposedly told Salmond, this would change after a yes in the referendum. Why? Because it would be good for Sterling and so good for the rUK.
Me? I don't actually mind. I lean more towards the view of many others in the Yes campaign rather than the SNP, that retaining Sterling would be sensible in the short term for both Scotland and rUK but a different currency might be best long term.
From Herald columnist
Iain MacWhirter:
Better Together are claiming that the Carney speech is a “slam dunk” because he said that monetary union would require a degree of fiscal and political union. Hah! What kind of independence is that! However, pooled sovereignty is quite possible between independent countries. There is already a lot of pooled sovereignty in the EU, of which Britain is still a member (though perhaps not for much longer).
Moreover, the Governor didn’t suggest that Scotland could be denied use of the pound or forecast a punitive reaction by the English Treasury if Scotland votes Yes, which is what many Unionists predict. Nor, crucially, did he look at the consequences of monetary disunion: what would happen if Scotland decided to look elsewhere if the UK negotiating terms were too onerous. An independent Scotland, like any country, would have options. It could pool sovereignty or look elsewhere.
[..]
And the euro, which is supposed to be bad news for big old countries, still seems to work for small new ones. Lativa, another high-growth country, has just joined the euro, to the amazement of economists and commentators in the UK who’ve been waiting for the eurozone to break up. Even countries that aren’t in the eurozone often have their currencies pegged to it. If for some reason the rest of the UK did try to play rough after independence, it might be Scotland that had the currency options.
And back in the
real world of independence polling ...
In a poll conducted for Scotland on Sunday and the first nationwide poll to be conducted since Christmas, ICM report that 37% think they will vote Yes this coming September, up five points on its previous poll back in September last year. Conversely, support for No is put at 44%, down five points. Once the Don’t Knows are excluded from the calculation, those figures translate into 46% Yes, 54% No, the highest Yes proportion yet in any poll, other than in a much criticised poll conducted by Panelbase for the SNP in August last year.
This swing comes on the back of four polls conducted between the publication of the Scottish Government’s independence White Paper at the end of November and Christmas that on average pointed to a two point swing in favour of Yes. Now we learn that perhaps that swing may have become rather bigger.
[..]
In responding to the publication of the latest Scottish Social Attitudes results, the SNP Deputy First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, stated the survey indicated that, ‘when we win the economic argument, we will win the referendum’. Indeed so – if the Yes side can win that argument victory could well be theirs. Presumably, we can now expect much more effort from it on that front.
Interesting times ...