JimC wrote:Hermit wrote:"I’d hoped that, when we walked out for the fifth Test in Sydney on January 3, it would have been with a chance of winning or retaining the Ashes. But that has gone now ... I feel that now is the right time to step down." Fucking piker. Wasn't he the top wicket-taker as recently as in the previous test series against Australia? I hope his "fighting spirit" is not infectious.
I hope it is...

You like one-sided tests?
I became interested in the game somewhere during the early 1970s precisely because they were not. That is despite the fact that Germans, among others, were not ever supposed to be able to understand the game. When I came to Australia my school never made me participate in rugby or cricket for that reason, although participating in both were compulsory for Australian-born students at Waverley College. This suited me well.
A year or two after finishing school I woke up around twoish one morning. Unable to go back to sleep, I tried reading, but could not concentrate. So I switched the TV on. That was a seemingly hopeless undertaking. All channels usually ceased transmitting anything anything by then. Sure enough, the three commercial ones only provided snow. For some unknown reason I turned the rotary switch to Aunty ABC. That station was usually the first one to shut down for the night, but not
this night. I witnessed an early example of television transmitted from the old dart to downunder via satellite. In glorious, grainy monochrome some people in white attire stood around a field. One of them would take three or four steps and throw a dark ball at someone, who in turn would tap at and stayed where he was. The commentator (probably Alan McGilvray) went "...and Boycott defends." This was repeated many times. Desperate to wallpaper over the inaction caused by several (8 ball) maiden overs in succession, Alan and his commentating partner (probably Trevor Bailey) took to discussing "the state of the match". Despite the lack of runs gotten and wickets taken, it seemed, the game was finely balanced. Yes, it might be drawn in the end, but a win by one side or the other was more likely, given the condition of the pitch, the weather, the remaining time (days) available, and depending on whether the batsmen were able to prevail over the cunning spinners or vice versa. "Well, what
is going to happen next? I wondered. The uncertainty of the outcome had me hooked on cricket. At least until Kerry Packer made sure that there was no uncertainty of a "result" when he pirated half of the test cricketers for the one-day pyjama games in order to gain more advertising revenue from tobacco, alcohol and car manufacturers, and the Windies made any test series a foregone conclusion.