Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Post Reply
User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by DaveDodo007 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:58 am

Coito ergo sum wrote:
DaveDodo007 wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
RiverF wrote:She's very dismissive of men's thoughts about male circumcision, there. As was the interviewer. In fact, the interviewer's bias in support of RW's hobby horse is obvious.
She's very dismissive of men in general. And, she gets outraged if a man tries to "tell a woman how to feel," but she constantly tells men how they should feel about things. Men's concerns are whines. Women's concerns, no matter what, are always serious.
I'm sorry but why does anybody care what this individual says, I don't know what the prerequisite for getting a communication degree is, though if we follow her example it sure doesn't include critical thinking, logic and reason. She will only matter while we give her the oxygen of publicity and even then it is just on the intertubes. Ignore her and she will fade into obscurity but knowing the interwebs then the lulz factor will play to big a roll and we will have to put up with her stupidity for a whole lot longer. :nervous:
For the same reason folks care what Creationists say. They have influence and won't stop trying to shove their idiocy down everyone's throat they possibly can.

I like to go to the occasional conference and convention, and I'd appreciate it if she wasn't invited to speak. That's one of the reasons I care.
That's a good point though she does seem to be thriving on the publicity I just thought maybe try a different tack.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:40 pm

I think that folks who sign these creeps to ruin conferences and conventions ought to know that some folks don't want to hear their brainless nattering.

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Thinking Aloud » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:48 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:I think that folks who sign these creeps to ruin conferences and conventions ought to know that some folks don't want to hear their brainless nattering.
In which case, some letters to the appropriate organisers, complaining that speaker X's talk was a) not what was advertised; b) seemed to be an entirely personal series of anecdotes; c) contained nothing of substance or relevance to the event; d) whatever, might be a start.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:49 pm

Thinking Aloud wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:I think that folks who sign these creeps to ruin conferences and conventions ought to know that some folks don't want to hear their brainless nattering.
In which case, some letters to the appropriate organisers, complaining that speaker X's talk was a) not what was advertised; b) seemed to be an entirely personal series of anecdotes; c) contained nothing of substance or relevance to the event; d) whatever, might be a start.
Excellent suggestions.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Jason » Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:06 pm

I suggest you include an 8'x10' of your penis and a swingers card as well.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:52 pm

Făkünamę wrote:I suggest you include an 8'x10' of your penis and a swingers card as well.
An 8 x 10? Giving me a lot of credit there... I think I can make do with a 5 x 7.

User avatar
DaveDodo007
Posts: 2975
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:35 am
About me: When ever I behave as a man I am called sexist, It seems being a male is now illegal and nobody sent me the memo. Good job as I would have told them to fuck off.
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by DaveDodo007 » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:52 pm

This is why I say you should ignore the trolls at ffb, skeptichicks and A+. Watson tweets.


‘If you have sex with someone that is drunk, they are unable to consent and that is rape.’

When naïve people respond, she pulls a bait and switch.

‘O you know just a bunch of people SO MAD because they are not allowed to have sex with someone who is blotto.’

Drunk/blotto, basically give a vague talk/post/tweet wait for the mugs to walk right into the trap and profit. You can’t argue with these fuckwits as they aren’t interested in honest debate, they are just trying to remain in the public (internet) eye.

Don’t believe me well in another tweet Watson make no attempt to hide it.

‘Now that adsense canned RSS ads, I’m searching for alternatives. I’ve fallen into a black hole of get-rich-quick losers.’

I’m not going to link to any of these tweets because I’m not giving them any clicks as it just what they want.

If people want to comment on the goings on at ffb, skeptchicks and A+. Make sure you do it at another venue so as to not give them what they want, drama and clicks (profit.)

Whether having sex with people who have consumed alcohol is consensual is another matter and worthy of debate just not with them hucksters.
We should be MOST skeptical of ideas we like because we are sufficiently skeptical of ideas that we don't like. Penn Jillette.

User avatar
Jason
Destroyer of words
Posts: 17782
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Jason » Wed Dec 19, 2012 7:33 pm

DaveDodo007 wrote: You can’t argue with these fuckwits as they aren’t interested in honest debate, they are just trying to remain in the public (internet) eye.
See my posts re the search volume of these fuckwits vs donkey porn.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:16 pm

What would the Skepchicks think?

User avatar
Cormac
Posts: 6415
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Cormac » Wed Sep 11, 2013 9:14 pm

Coito ergo sum wrote:What would the Skepchicks think?

I wonder what happened when the cop took him away to the side...
FUCKERPUNKERSHIT!


Wanna buy some pegs Dave, I've got some pegs here...
You're my wife now!

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:04 pm

Probably nothing other than the cop lecturing him.

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Dawkins: At War With The Feminists?

Post by Audley Strange » Thu Sep 12, 2013 2:15 pm

There's one for everything...
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests