I accept on an intellectual level we are deterred from doing things, but I'm not sure how far that goes. One doesn't put one's hand into a fire because one has the knowlege that it will burn the skin, but rather one has had the experience of burning.Trinity wrote:It depends, I think, on an individual's tolerance of such and defence mechanisms at play.Audley Strange wrote:Can you have one without the other though?
Is it not pain and fear that deter us, especially in those moments of emotion where much of what we consider crime is committed?
Boredom is subset of frustration, it is therefore like a mental "stress position" that you are making another endure. Fear and Fear of Pain are the same. Is it better to allow people to endure them, as they no doubt endure them for long periods of time in prison. This is an extremely costly and almost entirely negative way of dealing with crime. So how is attacking the physical person temporarily to create a similar outcome, but with less cost and potential short term and long term benefit to the criminal worse?
Imagine it. Let's call it the Blank. A large empty sphere in which you just have to sit for the duration of your sentence. Let say you got caught shoplifting and you have a sentence of 36 hours. However that sentence is only applicable when you are awake. You can sleep as much as you like but it will prolong the sentence and further disorient you. It's a blank space. There is nothing to harm you but your own imagination.
Certainly it's stressful, it is punative, but is such worse than say five whacks with a birch across the arse?