
State v Zimmerman
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
Trayvon called him a crazy ass cracker. That makes Trayvon racist, and Zimmerman was just reacting to that hate speech 

A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51321
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
But you never know what crazy ass crackers will do. The best thing is to shake their head against concrete till they give up their gun.
Re: State v Zimmerman

"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
Re: State v Zimmerman
You're a racist. You assume first that he IS a "cracker" (which he's not, he's Hispanic) and then you stereotype "crackers" as being "crazy ass."Tero wrote:But you never know what crazy ass crackers will do. The best thing is to shake their head against concrete till they give up their gun.
Doesn't get more racist than that.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke
"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth
© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
Age has little to do with it.Tero wrote:Yes well, we clearly have a 29 year old idiot and a teen idiot. Which one would you think has some experience to counteract his lack of smarts?
It doesn't matter how stupid either one of them was.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51321
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
So a 12 year old "acting weird" in a gated community would need to be stalked as well?
You keep critising my post as if I'm defending M. It's your stupid syg that is on trial. It produces unnecessary conflicts among idiots. Teens in hoidies: "these assholes always get away."
But not if you have an eager volunteer with a gun in his belt.
You keep critising my post as if I'm defending M. It's your stupid syg that is on trial. It produces unnecessary conflicts among idiots. Teens in hoidies: "these assholes always get away."
But not if you have an eager volunteer with a gun in his belt.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
Stalked? No. But, certainly a 12 year old out fairly late at night alone, skulking between people's homes, in the rain, with no evident purpose....prudence would dictate that someone give him a shout out and perhaps ask him "what are you doing here?" or something. If addressed in that manner, it would seem rather untoward for a 12 year old to attack the person addressing him.Tero wrote:So a 12 year old "acting weird" in a gated community would need to be stalked as well?
How is the system on trial?Tero wrote:
You keep critising my post as if I'm defending M. It's your stupid syg that is on trial. It produces unnecessary conflicts among idiots.
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
It wasn't stalking. Neighbors should approach strangers to find out what they want, especially in a gated community where strangers aren't allowed. It's private property, Trayvon didn't live there, and guests have to follow rules while they are visiting.Tero wrote:So a 12 year old "acting weird" in a gated community would need to be stalked as well?
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51321
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
What rules did he break so had to be stalked? Wear a hoodie?
Skalking? The concrete path is common! It leads to his patio.
Skalking? The concrete path is common! It leads to his patio.
Last edited by Tero on Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51321
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
Lawmakers will follow this case. SYG needs much narrower limits.Coito ergo sum wrote:Stalked? No. But, certainly a 12 year old out fairly late at night alone, skulking between people's homes, in the rain, with no evident purpose....prudence would dictate that someone give him a shout out and perhaps ask him "what are you doing here?" or something. If addressed in that manner, it would seem rather untoward for a 12 year old to attack the person addressing him.Tero wrote:So a 12 year old "acting weird" in a gated community would need to be stalked as well?
How is the system on trial?Tero wrote:
You keep critising my post as if I'm defending M. It's your stupid syg that is on trial. It produces unnecessary conflicts among idiots.
- Svartalf
- Offensive Grail Keeper
- Posts: 41047
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: Paris France
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
a 12 year old in a gated community IS weird anyway...Tero wrote:So a 12 year old "acting weird" in a gated community would need to be stalked as well?
You keep critising my post as if I'm defending M. It's your stupid syg that is on trial. It produces unnecessary conflicts among idiots. Teens in hoidies: "these assholes always get away."
But not if you have an eager volunteer with a gun in his belt.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping
- Tyrannical
- Posts: 6468
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:59 am
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
He had hopped the fence and was cutting behind people's houses.Tero wrote:What rules did he break so had to be stalked? Wear a hoodie?
Skalking? The concrete path is common! It leads to his patio.
A rational skeptic should be able to discuss and debate anything, no matter how much they may personally disagree with that point of view. Discussing a subject is not agreeing with it, but understanding it.
-
- Posts: 32040
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
What do you think stand your ground means?Tero wrote:Lawmakers will follow this case. SYG needs much narrower limits.Coito ergo sum wrote:Stalked? No. But, certainly a 12 year old out fairly late at night alone, skulking between people's homes, in the rain, with no evident purpose....prudence would dictate that someone give him a shout out and perhaps ask him "what are you doing here?" or something. If addressed in that manner, it would seem rather untoward for a 12 year old to attack the person addressing him.Tero wrote:So a 12 year old "acting weird" in a gated community would need to be stalked as well?
How is the system on trial?Tero wrote:
You keep critising my post as if I'm defending M. It's your stupid syg that is on trial. It produces unnecessary conflicts among idiots.
And, since stand your ground hasn't been raised in this case, how is it being tried?
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51321
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: State v Zimmerman
There is a path there! It is common ground. You only own the patio. The community mows the grass, not you.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests