Found not guilty, then judge says he may be guilty

[Seth]

How many pensioners require residential nursing homecare? You make it sound like an epidemic among the elderly.

There is who else is going to look after them, their families don't make me laugh. As the population gets older and older its going to be getting worse

According to
http://www.ageuk.org.uk/home-and-care/s ... e-lowdown/

The Government estimates that when all these changes come in, about 1 in 6 of all the older people who need care, or about 100,000 individuals, will benefit to at least some extent from them by 2025.

Which I make to be 600 000 people in residential care by 2025

Yes, it is going to get worse, which is why the aging Marxist dependent class is working so hard to enslave the young to their service.

The Conservative government is actually moving in the right directions if you have assets of less than £118k you can basically get the state to pay for it, which is going to be no one who has a house.

Meh. Put the house into an LLC or corporation and let the individual live there free.

If you do have a house there will be a lifetime cap on charges of £72000 which means if you want to keep your house you are going to have to have savings of somewhere around this and not just pour everything into house. If you don't have savings you are going to have to sell your underused 3 bedroom house to hopefully a family who actually needs it.

Fucking Marxist.

Not a big fan of the tories but in this I think they are actually making people think about their future and not their adult children

Er, most people live for the purpose of thinking about the future of their children, adult or otherwise. Usually people who think only of themselves are called, particularly by Marxists, "greedy Capitalists."

You just don't like the idea of someone's kids inheriting the family home because YOU don't have a golden nest-egg in the form of rich relatives you're trying to figure out how to bump off without getting caught. In other words, it's classic Marxist envy, greed and class-based jealousy you're expounding, nothing more or less.

You're a "have-not" who's mad because he didn't do well in life so you want to share your misery equally with everyone, which is the whole point of Marxism.

[Seth]

How many adults are still alive in fought in WW2, not an awful lot, if you were 18 in 1945 you are now 86 and mostly male. How many pensioners are this age?

I never said the government should take your house, I said they shouldn't give you large amounts of money if you own one. The consequence is you may well have to sell it on economic grounds but that's hardly at gun point

Right, no gun, just an economic nuke. So, why would anybody bother to save up and buy a house...ever...under your "system?"

Better to go on the dole, live in a Council-paid flat, smoke crack and make babies and never produce a fucking dime's worth of labor.

Oh, wait...that's exactly what's happening. Never mind.

[laklak]

Why would anyone need more than this?



If you're a good boy we'll let you buy one of these



Everyone has a job!



Stop worrying about your guns, these lads will protect you

[Coito ergo sum]

[Svartalf]

Capitalism, making the 1% obscenely wealthy and grinding the 99% down in the dust since the middle ages, if not longer.

[Coito ergo sum]

Capitalism, making the 1% obscenely wealthy and grinding the 99% down in the dust since the middle ages, if not longer.

Where are 99% of the people down in the dust? The Soviet Union was one place. Cuba is another. Venezuela is another. Must be capitalist bastions.

[Svartalf]

If the 1% had their way, they would be... Just look in the UK of Citystan.

[pErvinalia]

Capitalism, making the 1% obscenely wealthy and grinding the 99% down in the dust since the middle ages, if not longer.

Where are 99% of the people down in the dust? The Soviet Union was one place. Cuba is another. Venezuela is another. Must be capitalist bastions.

It's no less accurate than your bollocks about socialism. And yes, I've already pre-empted your lame rejoinder.

[Coito ergo sum]

Capitalism, making the 1% obscenely wealthy and grinding the 99% down in the dust since the middle ages, if not longer.

Where are 99% of the people down in the dust? The Soviet Union was one place. Cuba is another. Venezuela is another. Must be capitalist bastions.

It's no less accurate than your bollocks about socialism. And yes, I've already pre-empted your lame rejoinder.

Except that I can name socialist countries where what I said is true. You can't, however, name capitalist countries where the allegation that 99% of the population lives in dirt is true.

[pErvinalia]

Pre-empted.

[MrJonno]

A capitalist country is a contradiction in terms, the very fact it has borders is a distortion of the free market. Just about all countries are hybrid economies

[laklak]

Why would I let filthy poor people live in my clean dirt?