I call my foreskin Isaac.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:The foreskin was a human sacrifice substitute.

I call my foreskin Isaac.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:The foreskin was a human sacrifice substitute.
Hades, everybody knew that pork went bad quickly in the summer heat. The priest hijacked that and said that pork was a dirty meat and God didn't want us to eat it.hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
That doesn't change my point, which is that the law was an appeal to fear and faith, not reason-- even if there were good reasons to avoid pig meat at the time.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Hades, everybody knew that pork went bad quickly in the summer heat. The priest hijacked that and said that pork was a dirty meat and God didn't want us to eat it.hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
The one thing all the tribes had in common was religious law, so that was the way to mandate a safety measure. Another example I use is the holy cows of India. Once the cows were used to plow the fields. Without the cows the crops would be very small. So the religious edict against harming the cows came down. This got out of hand and we have the present situation in India.hadespussercats wrote:That doesn't change my point, which is that the law was an appeal to fear and faith, not reason-- even if there were good reasons to avoid pig meat at the time.Gawdzilla Sama wrote:Hades, everybody knew that pork went bad quickly in the summer heat. The priest hijacked that and said that pork was a dirty meat and God didn't want us to eat it.hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sepoy_MutinyBlind groper wrote:I have a Sikh friend, who will not eat beef. He told me that if he accidentally ate it, he would automatically up chuck till it was all gone. The whole idea nauseates him. I once tried to pull his leg by telling him I was going to sneak some beef into his curry. His reaction was so powerful that I have never even hinted at anything like that ever again. It may not be rational, but it is very, very powerful.
It's not just cooking pork properly. Pork goes off very quickly if not refrigerated. There were no bronze-age refrigerators, and it's hot in the desert, so by the time the hunter got back to camp with his freshly-killed boar, it wasn't quite so fresh anymore. In their hunger, someone rushed the cooking process and the whole camp got botulism or something. Therefore, God says pigs are unclean.hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.Svartalf wrote:Actually, I doubt so.hadespussercats wrote:The teen boys masturbating bit is from the Victorians-- they popularized it as a method to encourage self-control.Tero wrote:I thought it had something to do with teen boys masturbating. Not sure how the Bible would have worded it. Plus there is the pork stuff, which seems to have some health reasons then. They could have claimed the penis is cleaner.
The non-kosher-ness of pork may have health justifications, but they weren't part of the biblical dictate to not eat animals with cloven hooves (I think that's the description.)
And the bit about penis hygiene isn't part of the original mandate, either. I've read about circumcision and subincision rituals in tribal cultures-- usually they were part of the ceremony by which boys were recognized as men. It was about being able to withstand the pain, and be physically transformed by it.
If I had to guess, I'd say the Biblical procedure has similar roots.
Pork may be a relatively dangerous meat if not properly cooked, but we have no reason to believe the proper ways to cook it were secret, and FAWCT, they had been known since the neolithic.
OTOH, the pig shares one of the very worst reputations as an animal among people of that area... in ways, it's less of an insult to be called a baboon than a pig... never go why.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
IDMD2Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
Red tides, I expect.Mysturji wrote:It's not just cooking pork properly. Pork goes off very quickly if not refrigerated. There were no bronze-age refrigerators, and it's hot in the desert, so by the time the hunter got back to camp with his freshly-killed boar, it wasn't quite so fresh anymore. In their hunger, someone rushed the cooking process and the whole camp got botulism or something. Therefore, God says pigs are unclean.hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.Svartalf wrote:Actually, I doubt so.hadespussercats wrote: The teen boys masturbating bit is from the Victorians-- they popularized it as a method to encourage self-control.
The non-kosher-ness of pork may have health justifications, but they weren't part of the biblical dictate to not eat animals with cloven hooves (I think that's the description.)
And the bit about penis hygiene isn't part of the original mandate, either. I've read about circumcision and subincision rituals in tribal cultures-- usually they were part of the ceremony by which boys were recognized as men. It was about being able to withstand the pain, and be physically transformed by it.
If I had to guess, I'd say the Biblical procedure has similar roots.
Pork may be a relatively dangerous meat if not properly cooked, but we have no reason to believe the proper ways to cook it were secret, and FAWCT, they had been known since the neolithic.
OTOH, the pig shares one of the very worst reputations as an animal among people of that area... in ways, it's less of an insult to be called a baboon than a pig... never go why.
I've no doubt that shellfish are un-kosher for a similar reason: Moses probably ate a bad prawn.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
IDMD2Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests