The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

A forum to talk about other sites and things you've found in the jungle that is the internet.

Please take a moment to read the rationalia guidelines: http://rationalia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3449
Locked
User avatar
Robert_S
Cookie Monster
Posts: 13416
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
Location: Illinois
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Robert_S » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:16 pm

OK, who's gonna start the thread about sexism in gun culture?
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P

The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange

User avatar
SteveB
Nibbler
Posts: 7506
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 6:38 am
About me: The more you change the less you feel
Location: Potsville, BC, Canada
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by SteveB » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:04 pm

Only men with small penises have guns DONE! Wait, have to do it on the other thread.
Twit, twat, twaddle.
hadespussercats wrote:I've been de-sigged! :(

User avatar
Drewish
I'm with stupid /\
Posts: 4705
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Drewish » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:42 pm

But I own multiple guns... :cry:
Nobody expects me...

User avatar
Twoflower
Queen of Slugs
Posts: 16611
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:23 pm
About me: Twoflower is the optimistic-but-naive tourist. He often runs into danger, being certain that nothing bad will happen to him since he is not involved. He also believes in the fundamental goodness of human nature and that all problems can be resolved, if all parties show good will and cooperate.
Location: Boston
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Twoflower » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:43 pm

Does that mean you have multiple small penises?
I'm wild just like a rock, a stone, a tree
And I'm free, just like the wind the breeze that blows
And I flow, just like a brook, a stream, the rain
And I fly, just like a bird up in the sky
And I'll surely die, just like a flower plucked
And dragged away and thrown away
And then one day it turns to clay
It blows away, it finds a ray, it finds its way
And there it lays until the rain and sun
Then I breathe, just like the wind the breeze that blows
And I grow, just like a baby breastfeeding
And it's beautiful, that's life

Image

Taqiyya Mockingbird
Posts: 56
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 12:26 am
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Taqiyya Mockingbird » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:44 pm

Robert_S wrote:OK, who's gonna start the thread about sexism in gun culture?

....um......Sarah Palin...?

:biggrin: <---EDIT: I need one of these that turns to Trollface...heh...

User avatar
Bella Fortuna
Sister Golden Hair
Posts: 79685
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:45 am
About me: Being your slave, what should I do but tend
Upon the hours and times of your desire?
I have no precious time at all to spend,
Nor services to do, till you require.
Location: Scotlifornia
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Bella Fortuna » Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:20 am

HomerJay wrote:via ratskep:
Paula Kirby ‏@PaulaSKirby

Ladies and gentlemen, may I request a moment of silence in honour of CrucifixionPlus (Restored). pic.twitter.com/17wLZhof
Image
:funny: :funny: :funny: :funny:
Sent from my Bollocksberry using Crapatalk.
Image
Food, cooking, and disreputable nonsense: http://miscreantsdiner.blogspot.com/

surreptitious57
Posts: 1057
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:07 am

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by surreptitious57 » Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:51 am

Gallstones wrote:
I think that, based on the site name alone ie Atheism, that the traffic of new atheists and isolated atheists and questioning religious that richarddawkins.net used to get, will now find atheismplus. I think there is a very good likelihood that an appreciable building of membership will come from those people and they will like what the site says about itself. Whether they like how things are run, who can say. Being in need of like minded social interaction they very well might be willing to toe the atheismplus party line.

Sites with versions of rational or skeptic in their name aren't going to ping as readily with those people.

So, if those sites want to be another place for atheismplus members to go, like especially should those people become disillusioned with atheismplus, the other sites would need to be on the linked friend site list of atheismplus. Assuming atheismplus has such an arrangement.
Yes, but some of us are already on those sites anyway, Gallstones. Remember also that not everyone who is a member of Atheism Plus actually identifies with it now. Quite a few have raised objections about the name, for example, myself included. I have also constantly criticised the group think of Skepchick and freethoughtblogs too, which is not exactly the accepted view should be taking, but I am still there, so that is something good I supppose. So I for one will not be toeing any party line. Treating my fellow debaters with respect I already do anyway. But if the mere expression of an opinion is unacceptable, then I will certainly be voicing my opposition to that as a general principle. Nonetheless, it is a more inclusive community than the two sister sites, that is for sure. That may be because it is only early days, however. But even so.
A MIND IS LIKE A PARACHUTE : IT DOES NOT WORK UNLESS IT IS OPEN

User avatar
colubridae
Custom Rank: Rank
Posts: 2771
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:16 pm
About me: http://www.essentialart.com/acatalog/Ed ... Stars.html
Location: Birmingham art gallery
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by colubridae » Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:52 am

Seabass wrote:
Richard Carrier wrote:Of course, even the original statement should have been clear enough, since who would side with sexism and cruelty and irrationality? Lots of people, apparently. Many atheists declared themselves for Atheism Less in the comments. Then acted all surprised when I treated them like those who side with sexism and cruelty and irrationality. You reap what you sow, people.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/2412/
:quadruplepalmface:

Riiiiiggghht, Mr. Carrier. My refusal to join your club has nothing to do with you being a divisive, arrogant, sanctimonious prick who gives ultimatums; clearly, it must be because I support sexism, cruelty, and irrationality.


"You are either with us, or you are against us." - Richard Carrier 2012/George W. Bush 2001
"You are either with me, or you are my enemy" Annekin Skywalker/Darth Vader

"Villains who twerl their moustaches are easy to spot" Captain Picard.

(Margaret Chase) Smith was sworn into the Senate on January 3, 1949. Less than a year in office, she gained national attention when she became the first member of Congress to condemn the anti-Communist witch hunt led by her fellow Republican Senator, Joseph McCarthy of Wisconsin. Smith was initially impressed by McCarthy's accusations of Communists working in the State Department, but became disillusioned after McCarthy failed to provide any evidence to validate his charges. On June 1, 1950, she delivered a fifteen-minute speech on the Senate floor, known as the "Declaration of Conscience," in which she refused to name McCarthy directly but denounced "the reckless abandon in which unproved charges have been hurled from this side of the aisle." She said McCarthyism had "debased" the Senate to "the level of a forum of hate and character assassination." She defended every American's "right to criticize...right to hold unpopular beliefs...right to protest; the right of independent thought." While acknowledging her desire for Republicans' political success, she said, "I don't want to see the Republican Party ride to political victory on the four horseman of calumny -- fear, ignorance, bigotry, and smear." Six other moderate Senate Republicans signed onto her Declaration, including Wayne Morse of Oregon, George Aiken of Vermont, Edward Thye of Minnesota, Irving Ives of New York, Charles Tobey of New Hampshire, and Robert C. Hendrickson of New Jersey.
I have a well balanced personality. I've got chips on both shoulders

User avatar
Thinking Aloud
Page Bottomer
Posts: 20111
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:56 am
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Thinking Aloud » Thu Aug 30, 2012 1:53 pm

Bella Fortuna wrote:
Posting Rules
Don't Be a Dick: Wheaton's Law is in full effect. Don't harrass, insult or otherwise be an asshole to other forum members...
Don't Be a Dick

Insults targeting a persons ... Sex ... are prohibited


Errrr.... :think:
"Dick" means "Richard". Therefore, "Don't be Richard Dawkins (or any other white privileged male)".

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Coito ergo sum » Thu Aug 30, 2012 2:32 pm

LOL -- I signed up for a yahoo account so I could post a few comments (polite ones) on Carrier's FtB blog page. I went to log in to that new Yahoo account today, and it had been deactivated. There are two reasons possible: (a) dormancy for 6 or more months, or (b) violation of terms of service.

It couldn't be (a) since it was a new account.

It had to be (b), and the only place I used that new yahoo account at all, so far, was to post on Richard Carrier's blog. He must have reported my email account as a violation of Yahoo terms of service, and got it automatically deactivated. Let that be a lesson to everyone dealing with these pieces of shit. This is personal to them. They will fuck with you, even if all you do is present reasoned, rational, calm and polite arguments. If you don't agree with them, they will fuck you up.

Richard Carrier -- you're a disgusting son-of-a-bitch. Keep it up. The world will find out what you and your scumbag friends, like PZ Myers and the idiot Skepchicks are all about. Many people know already. Those you've been snowing will find out soon enough.

User avatar
Gerald McGrew
Posts: 611
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 5:32 pm
About me: Fisker of Men
Location: Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Gerald McGrew » Thu Aug 30, 2012 4:38 pm

So the atheism movement now has its own Puritans. I guess it was bound to happen eventually....but it's still surprising to witness.
If you don't like being called "stupid", then stop saying stupid things.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Seth » Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:44 pm

Gerald McGrew wrote:So the atheism movement now has its own Puritans. I guess it was bound to happen eventually....but it's still surprising to witness.
Next there'll be floggings and the pillory. Perhaps a heretic or two will be hung.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
JacksSmirkingRevenge
Grand Wazoo
Posts: 13516
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 6:56 pm
About me: Half man - half yak.
Location: Perfidious Albion
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by JacksSmirkingRevenge » Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:24 pm

Seth wrote:
Gerald McGrew wrote:So the atheism movement now has its own Puritans. I guess it was bound to happen eventually....but it's still surprising to witness.
Next there'll be floggings and the pillory. Perhaps a heretic or two will be hung.
Rumour has it that one or two of us are. :smug:
Sent from my Interositor using Twatatalk.

User avatar
laklak
Posts: 21022
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
Location: Tannhauser Gate
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by laklak » Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:40 pm

Like a baby's arm holding an apple, dude.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: The Atheism Plus "movement" -- good, bad, ugly?

Post by Seth » Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:42 pm

laklak wrote:Like a baby's arm holding an apple, dude.
What, your Clydesdale's cock? I have it on good authority that as a gun owner, you have a pencil dick.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests