Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Locked
User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Wed May 23, 2012 6:54 pm

Tyrannical wrote:
maiforpeace wrote:
Tyrannical wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:
No, he didn't. Clearly he anticipated a violent reaction from a potential burglar, which is why he was armed. Duh.
"potential burglar"= profiling
"anticipated a violent reaction=premeditated murder
Black = potentials criminals is just commonsense.
That's the way Blacks act, that is the way they are treated.
:ddpan:

I'm so proud that racism is alive and thriving on this forum.
Don't blame me, blame the way Blacks act.
Our ancestors were well aware of it well before Darwin. Yet now we are required to pretend they are equal :doh:
White society should not need to suffer the inferiority of the Negro.

I hope that one of your kids (if you have any) get married to the blackest man/woman from the ghetto and bring them home to visit you. :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Seth » Wed May 23, 2012 7:05 pm

Tero wrote:I would like to stick to my guns and dismiss the racism. I'm prejudiced against gun nuts. There may be profiling and they may have a short fuse. But
mainly they are looking for opportunity to be heroes, vigilantes. Kind of like Bush Jr.
Actually, most of them are looking after themselves, their neighbors and their community as a part of the belief that it is better that members of the community be vigilant (which is different from vigilantism) rather than submit to the sort of police state that the UK suffers under where cameras watch your every move and the police can stop you and interfere with your lawful activities for no better reason than that they want to do so.

We here in the US believe in individual freedom and the liberty to go about our daily lives free of the oppressive machinations of the sort of police state that is required to make cowards and servile proletarian slaves of the system comfortable. We would rather arm ourselves and provide for our own security, since we have to do so anyway even (or especially) in a police state where average people have more to fear from the police than they do from criminals.

So, we accept the risks of our fellow law-abiding citizens being armed as we are, so that we can live with greater freedom while accepting our fundamental individual responsibility to provide for our own and our community's safety and existence.

And it works out much better, as demonstrated by our liberties and our lower crime rates as compared to the police state tyrannies like the UK.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Warren Dew » Wed May 23, 2012 7:19 pm

kiki5711 wrote:I hope that one of your kids (if you have any) get married to the blackest man/woman from the ghetto and bring them home to visit you. :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
Why "from the ghetto"? That might just confirm Tyrannical's views.

You should be hoping they get married to a really dark black person who is a rich professional from the suburbs, so he'd have to admit he was wrong.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51228
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tero » Wed May 23, 2012 7:28 pm

I don't mind that police state. I have no love for cops, but their actions are regulated. In our growing urban life, arming citizens is a bad move.

The cops are not perfect, but they have no personal gain from shooting.

We are getting into racism here, but I would live in a Russian police state. Works on bribes.
Seth wrote:
Actually, most of them are looking after themselves, their neighbors and their community as a part of the belief that it is better that members of the community be vigilant (which is different from vigilantism) rather than submit to the sort of police state that the UK suffers under where cameras watch your every move and the police can stop you and interfere with your lawful activities for no better reason than that they want to do so.

We here in the US believe in individual freedom and the liberty to go about our daily lives free of the oppressive machinations of the sort of police state that is required to make cowards and servile proletarian slaves of the system comfortable. We would rather arm ourselves and provide for our own security, since we have to do so anyway even (or especially) in a police state where average people have more to fear from the police than they do from criminals.

So, we accept the risks of our fellow law-abiding citizens being armed as we are, so that we can live with greater freedom while accepting our fundamental individual responsibility to provide for our own and our community's safety and existence.

And it works out much better, as demonstrated by our liberties and our lower crime rates as compared to the police state tyrannies like the UK.

User avatar
amused
amused
Posts: 3873
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
About me: Reinvention phase initiated
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by amused » Wed May 23, 2012 7:29 pm

Several years ago I was involved in a project in south Texas that required bond funding from Lehman Brothers (remember them?) in New York. Over a course of several months we held conference calls with the assigned investment banker, usually on speakerphone. Very erudite and sharp as a whip. To us Texans, he just sounded sorta New Yorkyish, so we just assumed... Then he came down for a visit. The looks on all our faces must have been comical when a tall Black man walked into the room and introduced himself as the person we'd been doing business with on the phone.

Seth
GrandMaster Zen Troll
Posts: 22077
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:02 am
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Seth » Wed May 23, 2012 7:31 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
Right, so someone's BEHAVIOR justifying the suspicion is not profiling. Exactly.


I just said that it was profiling. What is your problem with understanding what I say?
If you think Martin was profiled then please explain what was the profile? You said you didn't think it was race. So, what was it?
You said it yourself that zimm thought he was a thief and looked like one, acting strange or something to that effect.....
Dear, THAT IS PROFILING.
No, it's suspect identification.

Your notion of "profiling" is asinine and ridiculous.

Besides, there's nothing wrong with profiling, which means to create a profile of a person for use in evaluating the required response based on observed characteristics or behavior.

Police profile every person they interact with. If you look like a crackhead junkie, they "profile" you and use the appropriate precautions and procedures for dealing with crackheads. If you look and act like a burglar, they "profile" you by observing your clothing, demeanor, movements, possessions, location, time, date, weather and a host of other characteristics or behavior that lead them to either obtain a reasonable suspicion to contact you or probable cause to arrest you.

Zimmerman did exactly that. He saw someone he believed was not a resident of the community under circumstances that raised in him a reasonable suspicion that the individual was a potential burglar casing the community. He first approached the individual to question him and when that individual ran, his suspicions were heightened by that action, which is not the action of a lawful resident or guest. So, he called 911, as he was supposed to do. Then he was attacked by the person he CORRECTLY profiled as a suspicious potential criminal and was forced to use deadly force to protect his life, just exactly as any police officer would have done.

What you're trying to imply is that the ONLY reason that Zimmerman was suspicious of Martin was that he was a black male, but the evidence does not support this interpretation. There were many other factors which Zimmerman related to the 911 dispatcher that, when combined with Martin's race, age, dress, demeanor, location and actions, gave rise to a reasonable belief that Martin did not belong there.

It may be "racial profiling" to use race as a component of profiling someone's potential criminal activities, but it's not necessarily or axiomatically wrong to do so, particularly in a place where it is unusual to see unknown teenage black males in hoodies wandering around between homes in the rain in a community where this is not a normal activity. Race in and of itself is not sufficient to establish either reasonable suspicion or probable cause for a police officer to detain or arrest someone, but it CAN BE one of several factors that, upon observation, support contacting the individual as a part of a voluntary contact where the individual is questioned but not detained in any way, which is evidently what Zimmerman did.

Although I despise and revile Tyrannical's overt racism (which is correctly defined as a belief that a person or race is either inherently better or worse than a person of a different race by virtue of race alone) and disagree utterly with his propositions, it nonetheless remains true in the United States that young black males are disproportionately involved in criminal activity, and that therefore their race, gender and age are legitimate factors in building a criminal profile WHEN COMBINED WITH OTHER ACTIONS. That race, age and gender may create heightened suspicion is, unfortunately, the fault of young black males as a demographic segment, although not necessarily as individuals. This is lamentable and unfortunate and it does create an atmosphere of distrust of young black males in society (even on the part of other blacks), but it's an understandable and not necessarily irrational distrust.

This would suggest that young black males who do not wish to have their race, gender and age affect the perceptions of others perhaps ought to go out of their way to disassociate themselves from the dress, style and activities that young black male thugs and hooligans engage in...such as wearing hoodies and wandering around in private gated communities and being belligerent towards people who attempt to determine whether they are legally authorized to be there.

When you lie down with pigs, you wake up smelling like a pig. If you don't want the police (or the neighborhood watchman) taking an interest in what you are doing, don't do things that the police (or the neighborhood watchman) find interesting. And if you find yourself being braced by someone who is suspicious of your activities and presence, for fuck's sake be polite and reasonable, don't jump them from behind and beat their head on the concrete, because you're likely to get shot that way.
"Seth is Grandmaster Zen Troll who trains his victims to troll themselves every time they think of him" Robert_S

"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." Edmund Burke

"Those who support denying anyone the right to keep and bear arms for personal defense are fully complicit in every crime that might have been prevented had the victim been effectively armed." Seth

© 2013/2014/2015/2016 Seth, all rights reserved. No reuse, republication, duplication, or derivative work is authorized.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51228
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tero » Wed May 23, 2012 7:45 pm

Seth, there are no details to support your sequence. The very first words said by Z or M laid out what followed. My hunch is that Z did not identify himself.

Lots of stupidity and some racist attitudes for both. But we will never know.

I label Z as stupid and gun nut first. Racism only came up to increase the conflict.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 7:51 pm

Tero wrote:
Coito ergo sum wrote:
Tero wrote:I would like to stick to my guns and dismiss the racism. I'm prejudiced against gun nuts. There may be profiling and they may have a short fuse. But
mainly they are looking for opportunity to be heroes, vigilantes. Kind of like Bush Jr.
LOL - prejudiced against gun NUTS or gun OWNERS. What is the difference, if any, in your mind?
Typically gun owners have a life, outside of guns. Nuts do not have a life. Guns need cash. So a job usually.
And, your reason for suggesting that Zimmerman is a nut, other than his lawful ownership of a gun, is.....? Anything?

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51228
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tero » Wed May 23, 2012 7:55 pm

I already stated, a hunch. Anyone who patrols for no pay, untrained but armed, is a gun nut in my book. We collect taxes for running a police unit. Keep a gun if the police are too far from you.

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 7:57 pm

kiki5711 wrote:
Right, so someone's BEHAVIOR justifying the suspicion is not profiling. Exactly.
I just said that it was profiling. What is your problem with understanding what I say?
Your inability to write, first of all.

Second of all, your monstrous understanding of the English language, which is exemplified by the above. Judging someone's behavior is not profiling. It just flat out isn't. Profiling is when you take general characteristics to determine likely suspects, irrespective of their behavior or specific facts related to that specific person -- profiling is like saying that the profile of a serial killer is a white, middle-aged, male, etc. That's profiling. Seeing someone walking around oddly in the rain, looking at houses, and looking like he's on drugs, and calling 911 because his behavior makes you suspicious is not profiling. By definition.
kiki5711 wrote:
If you think Martin was profiled then please explain what was the profile? You said you didn't think it was race. So, what was it?
You said it yourself that zimm thought he was a thief and looked like one, acting strange or something to that effect.....
Dear, THAT IS PROFILING.
I didn't ever say Zimmerman thought he was a thief, or looked like a thief.

Zimmerman says on the 911 tape why he called the police, due to Martin's behavior seeming strange. Dear, that isn't profiling. That's judging someone's behavior.

Fuck, here is the definition in this context: "the practice of categorizing people and predicting their behaviour according to particular characteristics such as race or age" - http://www.dictionary.com

I mean, really, kiki...

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 7:58 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
kiki5711 wrote:I hope that one of your kids (if you have any) get married to the blackest man/woman from the ghetto and bring them home to visit you. :hehe: :hehe: :hehe:
Why "from the ghetto"? That might just confirm Tyrannical's views.

You should be hoping they get married to a really dark black person who is a rich professional from the suburbs, so he'd have to admit he was wrong.
...yeah, like Sydney Poitier in "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner." :biggrin:

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 8:01 pm

Tero wrote:Seth, there are no details to support your sequence. The very first words said by Z or M laid out what followed. My hunch is that Z did not identify himself.
Really? Great! What were those very first words they each said?


Tero wrote:
Lots of stupidity and some racist attitudes for both. But we will never know.

I label Z as stupid and gun nut first. Racism only came up to increase the conflict.
Once again, the reason you have to conclude he's a nut? Is....? Anything?

The reason you have to conclude he's a racist? Is...? Anything?

Coito ergo sum
Posts: 32040
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Coito ergo sum » Wed May 23, 2012 8:03 pm

Tero wrote:I already stated, a hunch. Anyone who patrols for no pay, untrained but armed, is a gun nut in my book. We collect taxes for running a police unit. Keep a gun if the police are too far from you.
LOL - I'll alert my neighborhood watch, which I am glad exists in my community. The police are glad they exist, too, because they help report incidents, prevent incidents, speed response times, and aid in police-community relations. I'll let them know that if they have permits to carry guns and carry them, that they're gun nuts. :funny:

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51228
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by Tero » Wed May 23, 2012 8:23 pm

So "we dont need no stinking badges" ?

User avatar
kiki5711
Forever with Ekwok
Posts: 3954
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:51 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Unarmed teen shooting: the debate rages on...

Post by kiki5711 » Wed May 23, 2012 8:24 pm

Profiling is when you take general characteristics to determine likely suspects, irrespective of their behavior or specific facts related to that specific person -- profiling is like saying that the profile of a serial killer is a white, middle-aged, male, etc. That's profiling. Seeing someone walking around oddly in the rain, looking at houses, and looking like he's on drugs, and calling 911 because his behavior makes you suspicious is not profiling. By definition
pro·fil·ing  /ˈproʊfaɪlɪŋ/ Show Spelled[proh-fahy-ling] Show IPA
noun
the use of specific characteristics, as race or age, to make generalizations about a person, as whether he or she may be engaged in illegal activity.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests