Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
He may not have the charisma of Hitchens or the reach of Dawkins, but this is as good a job of demolishing (any) religion as I have come across. Impressive!
- amused
- amused
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:04 pm
- About me: Reinvention phase initiated
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism

Go get 'em Sam!
- Gawdzilla Sama
- Stabsobermaschinist
- Posts: 151265
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
- About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
- Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
Neat video!


- Ronja
- Just Another Safety Nut
- Posts: 10920
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:13 pm
- About me: mother of 2 girls, married to fellow rat MiM, student (SW, HCI, ICT...) , self-employed editor/proofreader/translator
- Location: Helsinki, Finland, EU
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
When was that? He looks so young (and not just due to the wonky picture ratio).
Thanks for posting Rum! Good stuff...
Thanks for posting Rum! Good stuff...
"The internet is made of people. People matter. This includes you. Stop trying to sell everything about yourself to everyone. Don’t just hammer away and repeat and talk at people—talk TO people. It’s organic. Make stuff for the internet that matters to you, even if it seems stupid. Do it because it’s good and feels important. Put up more cat pictures. Make more songs. Show your doodles. Give things away and take things that are free." - Maureen J
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can
. And then when they come back, they can
again." - Tigger
"...anyone who says it’s “just the Internet” can


- Rum
- Absent Minded Processor
- Posts: 37285
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:25 pm
- Location: South of the border..though not down Mexico way..
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
Says 2011 but I was surprised too.
What I like is the simplicity and logic of what he says. There's no arguing really!
What I like is the simplicity and logic of what he says. There's no arguing really!
- tattuchu
- a dickload of cocks
- Posts: 21889
- Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:59 pm
- About me: I'm having trouble with the trolley.
- Location: Marmite-upon-Toast, Wankershire
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
All for naught, unfortunately, since christfags don't care anything about logic.Rum wrote:Says 2011 but I was surprised too.
What I like is the simplicity and logic of what he says. There's no arguing really!
People think "queue" is just "q" followed by 4 silent letters.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
But those letters are not silent.
They're just waiting their turn.
- hackenslash
- Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
- About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
- Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
- Contact:
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51284
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
What was craigs rebuttal?
- Tero
- Just saying
- Posts: 51284
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
- About me: 15-32-25
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
There was 2hrs more, I skipped thru parts of it
http://youtu.be/yqaHXKLRKzg
something about Harris not being qualified to argue moral philosophical issues
http://youtu.be/yqaHXKLRKzg
something about Harris not being qualified to argue moral philosophical issues
-
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
Which is strange because he seems to be able to argue them reasonably well.Tero wrote:There was 2hrs more, I skipped thru parts of it
http://youtu.be/yqaHXKLRKzg
something about Harris not being qualified to argue moral philosophical issues

I also found this one interesting, talking about the problems of religious moderates.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- hackenslash
- Fundie Baiter...errr. Fun Debater
- Posts: 1380
- Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:05 am
- About me: I've got a little black book with my poems in...
- Location: Between the cutoff and the resonance
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
Ah, the Courtier's Reply. Well done, Bill, you lying fuckwit.Tero wrote:There was 2hrs more, I skipped thru parts of it
http://youtu.be/yqaHXKLRKzg
something about Harris not being qualified to argue moral philosophical issues
Dogma is the death of the intellect
- Robert_S
- Cookie Monster
- Posts: 13416
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:47 am
- About me: Too young to die of boredom, too old to grow up.
- Location: Illinois
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
I haven't run across anyone seriously trying that one since the old RDF days.hackenslash wrote:Ah, the Courtier's Reply. Well done, Bill, you lying fuckwit.Tero wrote:There was 2hrs more, I skipped thru parts of it
http://youtu.be/yqaHXKLRKzg
something about Harris not being qualified to argue moral philosophical issues
What I've found with a few discussions I've had lately is this self-satisfaction that people express with their proffessed open mindedness. In realty it ammounts to wilful ignorance and intellectual cowardice as they are choosing to not form any sort of opinion on a particular topic. Basically "I don't know and I'm not going to look at any evidence because I'm quite happy on this fence."
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
-Mr P
The Net is best considered analogous to communication with disincarnate intelligences. As any neophyte would tell you. Do not invoke that which you have no facility to banish.
Audley Strange
- mistermack
- Posts: 15093
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:57 am
- About me: Never rong.
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
Sam Harris DID do a good job in that clip, but in the bigger film, he was a lot weaker.
And it's because he is pushing a fuzzy claim. That there IS some kind of OBJECTIVE morality.
When there isn't. Craig had an easy job rebutting it, because Craig was right.
There is no such thing as objective morality.
There is a fairly widespread moral consensus, most humans agree on the basics. But that's not an OBJECTIVE morality, it's just loads of humans thinking and feeling the same way.
It's subjective, even if five billion people agree. We all have nearly identical dna, so we mostly have similar morals.
Harris is very good, but he was flogging a dead horse, in the main debate.
This particular clip is good though. It's the best bit. Very clear and obviously right.
And it's because he is pushing a fuzzy claim. That there IS some kind of OBJECTIVE morality.
When there isn't. Craig had an easy job rebutting it, because Craig was right.
There is no such thing as objective morality.
There is a fairly widespread moral consensus, most humans agree on the basics. But that's not an OBJECTIVE morality, it's just loads of humans thinking and feeling the same way.
It's subjective, even if five billion people agree. We all have nearly identical dna, so we mostly have similar morals.
Harris is very good, but he was flogging a dead horse, in the main debate.
This particular clip is good though. It's the best bit. Very clear and obviously right.
While there is a market for shit, there will be assholes to supply it.
-
- "I" Self-Perceive Recursively
- Posts: 7824
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:57 am
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
I don't agree with that. The moral consensus isn't relevant - in fact, the concept of an objective morality quite specifically means that there doesn't need to be consensus, and that some people/cultures (or more probably all, to different degrees) can be simply incorrect in their moral values.mistermack wrote: There is no such thing as objective morality.
There is a fairly widespread moral consensus, most humans agree on the basics. But that's not an OBJECTIVE morality, it's just loads of humans thinking and feeling the same way.
It's subjective, even if five billion people agree. We all have nearly identical dna, so we mostly have similar morals.
What is relevant are the quite objective trends in moral consensus, towards non-violence etc. - though that's not to say that following these trends to their ultimate conclusion will necessarily lead to any ultimate morality.
There are also absolute limits on what moralities can survive as the dominant morality in a culture. If the dominant morality leads a society into self destruction, it likely won't be passed on to future generations.
And there is quite simple logic behind that too, along the lines of - given some opportunities with unknown consequences, it is irrational to first take one that you do know will prevent you from exploring the others - e.g self destruction.
I'm not saying that mortality is clear-cut with simple to understand rules that will always apply. What I am saying is I think there is, for any given situation, a "right thing to do" - even though it's beyond humans to calculate what it is. But we can, given practice and understanding of moral philosophy, or even moral science, get a better approximation of the right thing. The concepts of morality exist. They have developed through an objective evolutionary process, and they do have some boundaries in logic. I see no reason to think that there aren't more objective facts to learn about morality.
And any arguments against it that repeatedly force along the line of "But why is that right?" seem to me to be no more use than arguments against scientific philosophical concepts like a materialistic universe that, if you force them, eventually lead to solipsism. Obviously we can't know for certain, but if we can get a model that seems to fit, then that's objective enough for me.
[Disclaimer - if this is comes across like I think I know what I'm talking about, I want to make it clear that I don't. I'm just trying to get my thoughts down]
- Jesus_of_Nazareth
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:09 pm
- Location: In your heart!
- Contact:
Re: Sam Harris destroys Catholicism
I don't think the Pope needs any help.
Get me to a Nunnery 
"Jesus also thinks you're a Cunt - FACT" branded leisure wear now available from selected retailers. Or simply send a prayer to the usual address.

"Jesus also thinks you're a Cunt - FACT" branded leisure wear now available from selected retailers. Or simply send a prayer to the usual address.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests