Trying to have an adult discussion while the monkeys in the peanut gallery fling poo I'm afraid.andrewclunn wrote:Well that was easy, so, where were we?
But I'm still game. Your serve I believe.
Trying to have an adult discussion while the monkeys in the peanut gallery fling poo I'm afraid.andrewclunn wrote:Well that was easy, so, where were we?
Well, we are almost certainly derailing evolution because we insist on protecting the weak and less intelligent and giving them all the tools they need to reproduce en masse even as the supposed intelligentsia decide to not-breed themselves into extinction through the anti-evolutionary application of "reason" and "science" to the environmental issues we face, which cases them to decide not to have children.Woodbutcher wrote:I think that small communities would do OK. There would be anarchy for quite some time in a larger community- factions would form rather quickly. Finns started many idealized communities in the early 1900ths, in South America and North America. They always fell apart due to infighting rather quickly; none survived past the second generation. Or is it just we Finns? In this area we have a saying: "Two Finns is a co-op, three Finns is a fight". Everybody seems to have a slightly different ideology, and everybody is pigheaded about their own view. Would it be any different with civilized folk?We are all different, and even communist rule did not change that in Russia. I wonder about North Korea. Is their fanaticism just skin deep or does the ugly go to the bone, so to speak? I see that Libertarianism would appeal to a lot of folks, but will it not create factions within itself due to individualism? The Doukhobors in Canada split up and fought, would Libertarians as well? The more freedom you give to individuals the less likely they are to agree on small things to start out with, culminating in "Fuck You!", "NO!, Fuck YOU, I'm not playing with you any more!" Cue shotguns at dawn, clusterbombs, flamethrowers, all-out battle and some survivors crawling out from underneath the rubble saying "What the fuck just happened?" I know this is rather pessimistic, but the inability to conform seems to be ingrained into our psyches from ever since the first ape quit the tree in disgust because the other apes wouldn't see things his way. Also, have our brains stopped evolving? Could it be due to our advances in medicine allowing the less desirable traits to survive and carry on?http://discovermagazine.com/2010/sep/25 ... -shrinking Maybe we are derailing evolution!
Them libertarians should get going on a gun that does abortions.andrewclunn wrote:Can't I just be a libertarian because I want a party that's okay with abortions and gun ownership?
I can make a bipod out of a coat hanger. Does that count?Tero wrote:Them libertarians should get going on a gun that does abortions.andrewclunn wrote:Can't I just be a libertarian because I want a party that's okay with abortions and gun ownership?
And she has to be self-insured.Tero wrote:No it has to shoot bullets and rip apart only the fetus. Maybe a slight hole in the mother's skin, no more than 5mm.
Couldn't the state provide free abortions if it paid for it by selling children from deliveries (that parents couldn't pay for) into slavery?Gawdzilla wrote:And she has to be self-insured.Tero wrote:No it has to shoot bullets and rip apart only the fetus. Maybe a slight hole in the mother's skin, no more than 5mm.
What? And take away the opportunity for some private business to provide that service? Fuck Big Government Abortions.andrewclunn wrote:Couldn't the state provide free abortions if it paid for it by selling children from deliveries (that parents couldn't pay for) into slavery?Gawdzilla wrote:And she has to be self-insured.Tero wrote:No it has to shoot bullets and rip apart only the fetus. Maybe a slight hole in the mother's skin, no more than 5mm.
Which brings up the anti-abortion-business nature of Planned Parenthood giving away free condoms to the poor...Gawdzilla wrote:What? And take away the opportunity for some private business to provide that service? Fuck Big Government Abortions.andrewclunn wrote:Couldn't the state provide free abortions if it paid for it by selling children from deliveries (that parents couldn't pay for) into slavery?Gawdzilla wrote:And she has to be self-insured.Tero wrote:No it has to shoot bullets and rip apart only the fetus. Maybe a slight hole in the mother's skin, no more than 5mm.
Damn straight. Their children should starve of malnutrition like nature intended!Robert_S wrote:Which brings up the anti-abortion-business nature of Planned Parenthood giving away free condoms to the poor...Gawdzilla wrote:What? And take away the opportunity for some private business to provide that service? Fuck Big Government Abortions.andrewclunn wrote:Couldn't the state provide free abortions if it paid for it by selling children from deliveries (that parents couldn't pay for) into slavery?Gawdzilla wrote:And she has to be self-insured.Tero wrote:No it has to shoot bullets and rip apart only the fetus. Maybe a slight hole in the mother's skin, no more than 5mm.
Whaddya mean no food? They got babies!!!Gawdzilla wrote:It's their fault if they aren't rich enough to afford food, now isn't it?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests