Venture Bros: day 2

Mafia Forum is visible to guests. Please note that game threads are limited to posts by players who are involved in each game. Non-player or derail posts will be moved to a gallery thread.

Moderator: Mafia Mods

Locked
User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Zigmen » Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:08 pm

gib wrote: now this shit about me switching to Aza - what would you have done in my position at that time?
I would have developed a list of my top scummy players (like I did), offered to voted for any of them (like I did) and stopped trying to pretend that Scum can't make false claims (like I did).

IOW, i would have done what I did.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by gib » Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:27 pm

Zigmen wrote:
gib wrote: now this shit about me switching to Aza - what would you have done in my position at that time?
I would have developed a list of my top scummy players (like I did), offered to voted for any of them (like I did) and stopped trying to pretend that Scum can't make false claims (like I did).

IOW, i would have done what I did.
i like how you tacitly assume i'm town in your answer there

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by gib » Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:30 pm

irre good point about gonzo - i'd forgotten he was playing

i'll look back at mantis's posts when i get to work

User avatar
gib
stone soup vendor
Posts: 2369
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by gib » Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:33 pm

gib wrote:zigmen what do you make of andrew asking you how he should vote?

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Zigmen » Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:33 pm

gib wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
gib wrote: now this shit about me switching to Aza - what would you have done in my position at that time?
I would have developed a list of my top scummy players (like I did), offered to voted for any of them (like I did) and stopped trying to pretend that Scum can't make false claims (like I did).

IOW, i would have done what I did.
i like how you tacitly assume i'm town in your answer there
You asked what I would have done in your position.

Are you claiming Indy?
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Zigmen » Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:38 pm

gib wrote:
gib wrote:zigmen what do you make of andrew asking you how he should vote?
I think this question falls under my umbrella assertion that you are creating smokescreens.

Personally, i think he is triangulating. It's not unlike what I did yesterday when I followed his reasoning about MZ and how odd it was that he voted for Shizz.

You really seem to be against any sort of unity.

I was tempted to move my vote around a bit today, but you've really got me convinced you're Scum.
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:23 pm

irretating wrote:Hmmm

I wasn't around at day end, so the railroad of Aza I saw after the fact. Not sure what you (on the BW) were thinking.

Gib your performance yesterday was so weird that I'm thinking I should vote you. But I need to reread the whole day 1 again first, especially as UT flipped town and I thought he was trying to railroad me to be the day 1 lynch.

I agree with Aza re mantis has some explaining to do.

Is bedtime for me, goodnight.
What do you want me to explain exactly? I voted him because he looked scummy. Charlou came into the thread earlier, saying that she didn't have any scum picks so wasn't going to vote. Aza voted her for this. Then unvotes and moves to a DP bandwagon.

If I were scum, I wouldn't be specifically stating that I wasn't going to put down a vote.. which makes it look like Charlou was/is town.

hope everything's okay, btw Charlou

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:27 pm

Zig - you asked about defending MZ. The 1st time I read the interaction between him and MattShizzle, I couldn't believe that a scum would throw out the same safe claim as another player. There's just no point to that. Which is why I find it strange that others, andrew comes to mind, were trying to figure out how it could be a scum ploy on MZ's part. That just seems too complicated. Think about it - if you are scum and have a safe claim, only to find that someone else has this character - 1st thing I'd do is ask the GM, not state it in the thread.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:37 pm

Irre I can't help but think that you used Aza's statement as an opportunistic chance to blame the bw on me.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:39 pm

Zigmen wrote:
gib wrote:
yesterday you stated that you didn''t believe MZ's claim and wanted him lynched. Do you believe his claim now?
I'd assume our specials have sorted out MZ, or will soon. There's enough attention on him to warrant that.
So you do believe his claim now? Or are just not certain?

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Zigmen » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:43 pm

Mantisdreamz wrote:Zig - you asked about defending MZ. The 1st time I read the interaction between him and MattShizzle, I couldn't believe that a scum would throw out the same safe claim as another player. There's just no point to that. Which is why I find it strange that others, andrew comes to mind, were trying to figure out how it could be a scum ploy on MZ's part. That just seems too complicated. Think about it - if you are scum and have a safe claim, only to find that someone else has this character - 1st thing I'd do is ask the GM, not state it in the thread.
Okay. But later when MZ voted Shizz, why didn't you see that as Scummy? MZ had built a house of cards based on very suspicious reasoning. Part of that reasoning was that MZ knew Shizz had already claimed the same character, right? Didn't the voting thing make you reassess the entire story?
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

User avatar
Drewish
I'm with stupid /\
Posts: 4705
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Drewish » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:43 pm

##vote DP##

Where the hell are you?!
Nobody expects me...

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:46 pm

Zigmen wrote:
Mantisdreamz wrote:Zig - you asked about defending MZ. The 1st time I read the interaction between him and MattShizzle, I couldn't believe that a scum would throw out the same safe claim as another player. There's just no point to that. Which is why I find it strange that others, andrew comes to mind, were trying to figure out how it could be a scum ploy on MZ's part. That just seems too complicated. Think about it - if you are scum and have a safe claim, only to find that someone else has this character - 1st thing I'd do is ask the GM, not state it in the thread.
Okay. But later when MZ voted Shizz, why didn't you see that as Scummy? MZ had built a house of cards based on very suspicious reasoning. Part of that reasoning was that MZ knew Shizz had already claimed the same character, right? Didn't the voting thing make you reassess the entire story?
Actually, it made more sense to me at the time to be suspicious of Mattshizzle. I still think it does make sense.

User avatar
Mantisdreamz
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:01 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Mantisdreamz » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:47 pm

i'd like to hear more from amok too

User avatar
Zigmen
Posts: 1922
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:04 am
Contact:

Re: Venture Bros: day 2

Post by Zigmen » Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:47 pm

Mantisdreamz wrote:
Zigmen wrote:
gib wrote:
yesterday you stated that you didn''t believe MZ's claim and wanted him lynched. Do you believe his claim now?
I'd assume our specials have sorted out MZ, or will soon. There's enough attention on him to warrant that.
So you do believe his claim now? Or are just not certain?
It's a moot point. Our specials have probably already taken steps to deal with this, or they will very soon.

IOW, wasting today's votes and discussion on it is like sending two fire engines to put out a single smoking trashcan.

However, fwiw, I don't believe MZ's story.

Xpost x3
~Three of a Perfect Pair~

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests