Holy Crap!
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:19 pm
maiforpeace wrote:andrewclunn wrote:PordFrefect wrote:andrewclunn wrote:New plan for Middle Eastern peace, give every single woman a pistol.
Better yet a full-auto 12 gauge!

No I'm serious. A concealable weapon in the hands of the women in the middle East would mean that violence against women would decline rapidly.
There are plenty of weapons available and it's not like women in the middle east lack a place to conceal it.
Each woman is alone and isolated by that fucked up religion. They need to connect and form a movement, with plenty of outside support.
And weapons.

no fences
-
Feck
- .

- Posts: 28391
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Feck » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:26 pm
andrewclunn wrote:PordFrefect wrote:andrewclunn wrote:New plan for Middle Eastern peace, give every single woman a pistol.
Better yet a full-auto 12 gauge!

No I'm serious. A concealable weapon in the hands of the women in the middle East would mean that violence against women would decline rapidly.
That's a
little naive also you show the Merkin trait of weapon =GUN honestly if women can be raped and then because they reported it and the men cannot be found guilty(no male witness) so the woman is stoned for adultery do you think a GUN is going to change their status ?
That's almost as simplistic to think that failing to control /upgrade/help a country after you have bombed it 'back to the stone age' is going to encourage modern western progressive thinking !
After all we know how much cluster bombs and napalm helped the people of Laos and Cambodia against Communism
Which Republican candidate are you going to vote for again

-
laklak
- Posts: 21022
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:07 pm
- About me: My preferred pronoun is "Massah"
- Location: Tannhauser Gate
-
Contact:
Post
by laklak » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:31 pm
The one who wants to legalize private possession of tactical nukes, of course.
Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion, man.
-
Drewish
- I'm with stupid /\
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Drewish » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:33 pm
Man what a BS rant that was

Nobody expects me...
-
Feck
- .

- Posts: 28391
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Feck » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:37 pm
andrewclunn wrote:Man what a BS rant that was

Yeah I know I can get a little intolerant of STUPID .Mea Culpa
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:37 pm
Living in a culture that allows rape, blames the victim, then violently kills her ... I think restoring the balance a bit by arming the women is a worthy proposal. You want to get fucked you ignorant, patriarchal, malevolent psychopath? Okay. *bang*

no fences
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:38 pm
And there's feminist twats banging on about the sexual objectification of being invited for coffee in an elevator.

Last edited by
charlou* on Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
no fences
-
Feck
- .

- Posts: 28391
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:25 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Feck » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:40 pm
A lovely idea but Naive . What do you think would happen to the first woman to defend herself ?
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:41 pm
Feck wrote:A lovely idea but Naive . What do you think would happen to the first woman to defend herself ?
charlou wrote:Each woman is alone and isolated by that fucked up religion. They need to connect and form a movement, with plenty of outside support.
no fences
-
Drewish
- I'm with stupid /\
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Drewish » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:43 pm
charlou wrote:And there's feminist twats banging on about the sexual objectification of being invited for coffee in an elevator.

Oh I was over at the SGU forums during the whole elevator gate thing. Let me tell you, quite the explosive topic over there.
Nobody expects me...
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:44 pm
Feck wrote:A lovely idea but Naive . What do you think would happen to the first woman to defend herself ?
Women are already dying .. they might as well be fighting for their emancipation while they're at it.

no fences
-
charlou
- arseist
- Posts: 32530
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 2:36 am
Post
by charlou » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:46 pm
andrewclunn wrote:charlou wrote:And there's feminist twats banging on about the sexual objectification of being invited for coffee in an elevator.

Oh I was over at the SGU forums during the whole elevator gate thing. Let me tell you, quite the explosive topic over there.
Yah .. I was pretty involved in that debate. Most time I've ever spent at RatSkep, actually.
no fences
-
maiforpeace
- Account Suspended at Member's Request
- Posts: 15726
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:41 am
- Location: under the redwood trees
Post
by maiforpeace » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:47 pm
charlou wrote:
Each woman is alone and isolated by that fucked up religion. They need to connect and form a movement, with plenty of outside support.
I agree...weapons alone won't do it. I need to find out what women's movements provide this badly needed outside support...if you know of some already Charlou please share. (vs the atheist/non believer ones that I am already familiar with)
andrewclunn wrote:Man what a BS rant that was

Maybe the very last sentence was, but not the rest of it...he makes excellent points.
charlou wrote:Feck wrote:A lovely idea but Naive . What do you think would happen to the first woman to defend herself ?
Women are already dying .. they might as well be fighting for their emancipation while they're at it.

Yup, this is definitely revolution worthy.
-
Jason
- Destroyer of words
- Posts: 17782
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:46 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Jason » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:54 pm
maiforpeace wrote:andrewclunn wrote:Man what a BS rant that was

Maybe the very last sentence was, but not the rest of it...he makes excellent points.
Maybe they'd be good points if I was serious.
Anti-gun rants are rarely excellent anyway. More often ignorant and emotionally charged.
-
Drewish
- I'm with stupid /\
- Posts: 4705
- Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:31 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Drewish » Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:55 pm
maiforpeace wrote:andrewclunn wrote:Man what a BS rant that was

Maybe the very last sentence was, but not the rest of it...he makes excellent points.
Really? Bringing up Cambodia and cluster bombs is relevant? Calling me naive and my idea simplistic isn't an ad hominem? Comparing it to post-war nation building isn't a non sequitur? I think you're definition of an "excellent point" needs some adjusting.
EDIT -
PordFrefect, I was saying that Feck's response was a rant.
Last edited by
Drewish on Fri Nov 11, 2011 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nobody expects me...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests