Cain Now Has 3 Harassment Accusers

[Warren Dew]

Now, I dunno what you wanna call that. I'm gonna call it "popping out of the woodwork." I think most people would agree, and I think the fact you're trying not to is a measure of your bias, not of the truth.

That's like saying the fact that you don't blame Clinton for the murder of Mary Mahoney is a measure of your bias.

[Schneibster]

The Republicans were the ones who impeached a President for a blowjob. I'm just pointing out that if you're gonna impeach a President for a blowjob, this guy's not qualified to be President.

It's called being "hoist by your own petard." Get over it.

He wasn't impeached for a blow-job,

First lie.

[Schneibster]

They're popping out of the woodwork

To the contrary, they're staying in the woodwork.

Well, one comes up through somebody (Cain's campaign alleges somebody in Perry's campaign, who denies it) about a US$35,000.00 settlement, and all of a sudden the Cain campaign (!) is discussing the US$45,000.00 settlement, and everybody's like, "Ummm, what US$45,000.00 settlement?" and they're like, "Duuuhhhh ummmm."

Next thing you know another one says she was gonna go after him for it too but when she heard one of her friends had already gotten after him she decided she was OK not pursuing it (and given the rate at which retaliation occurs since the Republican Teagagger Party started suppressing enforcement, I'm not surprised).

"Suppressing enforcement?" What the hell are you talking about? You're really going off the reservation now.

Glass-Steagall.

First lie.

[Schneibster]

Now, I dunno what you wanna call that. I'm gonna call it "popping out of the woodwork." I think most people would agree, and I think the fact you're trying not to is a measure of your bias, not of the truth.

That's like saying the fact that you don't blame Clinton for the murder of Mary Mahoney is a measure of your bias.

So, is eliminating all the evidence and pretending it doesn't exist when you reply a strawman?

Just askin'.

[Seth]

They're popping out of the woodwork

To the contrary, they're staying in the woodwork.

Well, one comes up through somebody (Cain's campaign alleges somebody in Perry's campaign, who denies it) about a US$35,000.00 settlement, and all of a sudden the Cain campaign (!) is discussing the US$45,000.00 settlement, and everybody's like, "Ummm, what US$45,000.00 settlement?" and they're like, "Duuuhhhh ummmm."

Next thing you know another one says she was gonna go after him for it too but when she heard one of her friends had already gotten after him she decided she was OK not pursuing it (and given the rate at which retaliation occurs since the Republican Teagagger Party started suppressing enforcement, I'm not surprised).

"Suppressing enforcement?" What the hell are you talking about? You're really going off the reservation now.

Glass-Steagall.

First lie.

Evidently you're more ignorant that I first thought. Glass-Steagall, (the 1933 version) created the FDIC. What the fuck does that have to do with sexual harassment allegations and private claims settlements?

[Seth]

The Republicans were the ones who impeached a President for a blowjob. I'm just pointing out that if you're gonna impeach a President for a blowjob, this guy's not qualified to be President.

It's called being "hoist by your own petard." Get over it.

He wasn't impeached for a blow-job,

First lie.

Nice quote mining attempt there, sparky. As I said in the following sentence, he was impeached for lying about it. Blow-jobs aren't illegal. Perjury is.

[Schneibster]

Four.



This sounds like a full-on sexual assault rather than just a bit of harassment.

She's a registered Republican and met him at a Teagagger rally. There's nothing else to be said here. I repeat: popping out of the woodwork.

[Schneibster]

And from the very mouth of Faux Entertainment:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11 ... e-for-job/

[Warren Dew]

Four.

And the first one that's credible.

[Tero]

Who said politics was boring. And I missed it a bit in the Tero Report but close enough.

[Seth]

Four.

And the first one that's credible.

Really? What makes her "credible?" She's making 14 year old claims that she didn't think were important enough to report at the time, which actually reduces her credibility. Where's her actual forensic evidence? Any DNA? Any sperm? Any witnesses? Nope, didn't think so.

It's an unsubstantiated allegation, nothing more, and it's not really credible at all.

[Schneibster]

I'd always figured cranks decided to delude themselves, but it's nice to see proof.

[Seth]

I'd always figured cranks decided to delude themselves, but it's nice to see proof.

Been looking in the mirror again, have you?

[Schneibster]

Five.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/67819.html

[Ayaan]

Wow. I'd heard about the fourth one, but not this one. Makes you wonder how many more are out there.