And somewhat too heavily involved in the thinking end - answering the question "how many Atheists can you fit on the head of a pin?" is all very useful (answer: "as many you want - just gotta kill all the Angels first" 
).....but it doesn't help on the practical side of killing the current crop of gods.To do that needs more practical solutions and tactics. and dare I say it.......Atheism could learn a thing or two from religions on that side of things! especially that no need to play fair or be reasonable. It's a religous war, not a debate.
I would favour a combination of faux reasonableness, mockery and perjorative language with something like:
A Campaign for Religous Intolerance - I don't see any legal problem with being against the concept of all religions................. and tactically pushing for practical things like a law against the religous grooming of children (deliberate choice of language) both in state funded schools and also by private organisations (schools / churches = child grooming centres). Got to make the current religions look like the pagans, druids etc and to do that have to do as the religions do - target the kids! or at least remove them from the brainwashing factories.......... "Do you want your kid educated in the bronze age, the iron age, the 9th Century or for the 21st Century?"
Possibly also using double meaning slogans "Leave the kids alone!" or "Say No! to Ignorance"- harmless enough not to attract legal problems, but when on a simple sticker attached to a Church door on an organised basis sends a message.......graffiti is such old hat!
Any thoughts? or do you think the Dawkins approach on it's own will suffice?
