Bible circumcision

Holy Crap!
User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by hadespussercats » Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:57 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:The foreskin was a human sacrifice substitute.
I call my foreskin Isaac. :mrgreen:
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51272
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Tero » Sun Sep 02, 2012 4:37 pm

Did you here the one about the rabbi who did not want to be paid for the job? He only took tips.
:sofa:

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Sep 02, 2012 4:53 pm

hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
Hades, everybody knew that pork went bad quickly in the summer heat. The priest hijacked that and said that pork was a dirty meat and God didn't want us to eat it.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Audley Strange
"I blame the victim"
Posts: 7485
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 5:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Audley Strange » Sun Sep 02, 2012 4:57 pm

Well they wandered the deserts so perhaps they were getting a lot of sand under the foreskin and found this made them highly irritable so they lopped them off.
"What started as a legitimate effort by the townspeople of Salem to identify, capture and kill those who did Satan's bidding quickly deteriorated into a witch hunt" Army Man

User avatar
Tero
Just saying
Posts: 51272
Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2010 9:50 pm
About me: 15-32-25
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Tero » Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:16 pm

Zappa had a song: Don't you ever wash that thing?

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41043
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Svartalf » Sun Sep 02, 2012 5:21 pm

Yeah, that smacks of ritual impurity, like the thing with women in their bad week, and their blood, and their need to take a special bath rather than a normal one... rather than actual hygienic concerns.
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by hadespussercats » Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:52 pm

Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
Hades, everybody knew that pork went bad quickly in the summer heat. The priest hijacked that and said that pork was a dirty meat and God didn't want us to eat it.
That doesn't change my point, which is that the law was an appeal to fear and faith, not reason-- even if there were good reasons to avoid pig meat at the time.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Sun Sep 02, 2012 11:54 pm

hadespussercats wrote:
Gawdzilla Sama wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
Hades, everybody knew that pork went bad quickly in the summer heat. The priest hijacked that and said that pork was a dirty meat and God didn't want us to eat it.
That doesn't change my point, which is that the law was an appeal to fear and faith, not reason-- even if there were good reasons to avoid pig meat at the time.
The one thing all the tribes had in common was religious law, so that was the way to mandate a safety measure. Another example I use is the holy cows of India. Once the cows were used to plow the fields. Without the cows the crops would be very small. So the religious edict against harming the cows came down. This got out of hand and we have the present situation in India.
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Blind groper
Posts: 3997
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:10 am
About me: From New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Blind groper » Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:27 am

I have a Sikh friend, who will not eat beef. He told me that if he accidentally ate it, he would automatically up chuck till it was all gone. The whole idea nauseates him. I once tried to pull his leg by telling him I was going to sneak some beef into his curry. His reaction was so powerful that I have never even hinted at anything like that ever again. It may not be rational, but it is very, very powerful.
For every human action, there is a rationalisation and a reason. Only sometimes do they coincide.

User avatar
Gawdzilla Sama
Stabsobermaschinist
Posts: 151265
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:24 am
About me: My posts are related to the thread in the same way Gliese 651b is related to your mother's underwear drawer.
Location: Sitting next to Ayaan in Domus Draconis, and communicating via PMs.
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Gawdzilla Sama » Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:11 am

Blind groper wrote:I have a Sikh friend, who will not eat beef. He told me that if he accidentally ate it, he would automatically up chuck till it was all gone. The whole idea nauseates him. I once tried to pull his leg by telling him I was going to sneak some beef into his curry. His reaction was so powerful that I have never even hinted at anything like that ever again. It may not be rational, but it is very, very powerful.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sepoy_Mutiny
Image
Ein Ubootsoldat wrote:“Ich melde mich ab. Grüssen Sie bitte meine Kameraden.”

User avatar
Svartalf
Offensive Grail Keeper
Posts: 41043
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: Paris France
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Svartalf » Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:21 am

What? it started as a Potemkin incident?
Embrace the Darkness, it needs a hug

PC stands for "Patronizing Cocksucker" Randy Ping

User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Mysturji » Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:53 pm

hadespussercats wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
Tero wrote:I thought it had something to do with teen boys masturbating. Not sure how the Bible would have worded it. Plus there is the pork stuff, which seems to have some health reasons then. They could have claimed the penis is cleaner.
The teen boys masturbating bit is from the Victorians-- they popularized it as a method to encourage self-control.
The non-kosher-ness of pork may have health justifications, but they weren't part of the biblical dictate to not eat animals with cloven hooves (I think that's the description.)
And the bit about penis hygiene isn't part of the original mandate, either. I've read about circumcision and subincision rituals in tribal cultures-- usually they were part of the ceremony by which boys were recognized as men. It was about being able to withstand the pain, and be physically transformed by it.
If I had to guess, I'd say the Biblical procedure has similar roots.
Actually, I doubt so.

Pork may be a relatively dangerous meat if not properly cooked, but we have no reason to believe the proper ways to cook it were secret, and FAWCT, they had been known since the neolithic.

OTOH, the pig shares one of the very worst reputations as an animal among people of that area... in ways, it's less of an insult to be called a baboon than a pig... never go why.
All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
It's not just cooking pork properly. Pork goes off very quickly if not refrigerated. There were no bronze-age refrigerators, and it's hot in the desert, so by the time the hunter got back to camp with his freshly-killed boar, it wasn't quite so fresh anymore. In their hunger, someone rushed the cooking process and the whole camp got botulism or something. Therefore, God says pigs are unclean.
I've no doubt that shellfish are un-kosher for a similar reason: Moses probably ate a bad prawn.
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.

User avatar
hadespussercats
I've come for your pants.
Posts: 18586
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:27 am
About me: Looks pretty good, coming out of the back of his neck like that.
Location: Gotham
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by hadespussercats » Tue Sep 11, 2012 3:40 pm

Mysturji wrote:
hadespussercats wrote:
Svartalf wrote:
hadespussercats wrote: The teen boys masturbating bit is from the Victorians-- they popularized it as a method to encourage self-control.
The non-kosher-ness of pork may have health justifications, but they weren't part of the biblical dictate to not eat animals with cloven hooves (I think that's the description.)
And the bit about penis hygiene isn't part of the original mandate, either. I've read about circumcision and subincision rituals in tribal cultures-- usually they were part of the ceremony by which boys were recognized as men. It was about being able to withstand the pain, and be physically transformed by it.
If I had to guess, I'd say the Biblical procedure has similar roots.
Actually, I doubt so.

Pork may be a relatively dangerous meat if not properly cooked, but we have no reason to believe the proper ways to cook it were secret, and FAWCT, they had been known since the neolithic.

OTOH, the pig shares one of the very worst reputations as an animal among people of that area... in ways, it's less of an insult to be called a baboon than a pig... never go why.
All I'm saying is if you read the religious texts re- not eating pig, you're not going to find a discussion of trichinosis prevention. Just words to the effect that pigs are filthy ad god will be very mad if you eat them.
It's not just cooking pork properly. Pork goes off very quickly if not refrigerated. There were no bronze-age refrigerators, and it's hot in the desert, so by the time the hunter got back to camp with his freshly-killed boar, it wasn't quite so fresh anymore. In their hunger, someone rushed the cooking process and the whole camp got botulism or something. Therefore, God says pigs are unclean.
I've no doubt that shellfish are un-kosher for a similar reason: Moses probably ate a bad prawn.
Red tides, I expect.

Listen, I'm not saying there weren't behind-the-scenes sound reasons for many of these dictates-- just that the laws themselves were never based on an appeal to reason. The laws were (and are) about blind obedience, not reason.

I'm making an issue of this, because I think it's tempting for some to take examples like these and extrapolate that there are sound reasons behind religious laws-- that religious laws on some level must make sense. They don't. You can find good reasons for some religious laws, but that doesn't make the laws reasonable.
The green careening planet
spins blindly in the dark
so close to annihilation.

Listen. No one listens. Meow.

User avatar
Mysturji
Clint Eastwood
Posts: 5005
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:08 pm
About me: Downloading an app to my necktop
Location: http://tinyurl.com/c9o35ny
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Mysturji » Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:27 pm

I think we're in agreement. There USED to be good reason to avoid eating pork in a hot environment 4,000 years ago. Not any more.

OTOH, where the obsession with foreskins comes from is a complete mystery to me.
As is the current location of mine. :lay:
Sir Figg Newton wrote:If I have seen further than others, it is only because I am surrounded by midgets.
Cormac wrote:Doom predictors have been with humans right through our history. They are like the proverbial stopped clock - right twice a day, but not due to the efficacy of their prescience.
IDMD2
I am a twit.

User avatar
Animavore
Nasty Hombre
Posts: 39276
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Ire Land.
Contact:

Re: Bible circumcision

Post by Animavore » Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:48 pm

Image
Libertarianism: The belief that out of all the terrible things governments can do, helping people is the absolute worst.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests