Not when I make it at home. Mine might not be a perfectly disc shaped, but they pile up as well as that one.egbert wrote:Yeah - see if the burger you ACTUALLY get looks anything like that ad agency propaganda lie.Gallstones wrote:I am really craving a cheeseburger loaded right now.
I think McDonald's is the only place still open.
You'll get a soggy bun with some frumpy lettuce showing, and a meat patty so small you can't even see it unless you lift off the top of the bun...
Ban Ronald McDonald?
- Gallstones
- Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
- Posts: 8888
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
- About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter
- sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media? - Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
admit the truthWarren Dew wrote:sandinista wrote:reference?United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change, 2007, p. 81.Code: Select all
Main direct drivers Rate of Deforestation/Degradation (percentage) Commercial agriculture: Commercial crops 20 Cattle ranching (large scale) 12 Subsistence farming: Small scale agriculture/shifting cultivation 42 Fuel-wood and NTFP gathering 6 Wood extraction: Commercial (legal and illegal) 14 Fuel-wood/charcoal (traded) 5
Globally, subsistence farming is #1, farming of commercial crops is #2, and ranching is far behind at #4. But hey, feel free to cherry pick atypical regional data so you don't have to admit the truth.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367646/
The farm animal sector is the single largest anthropogenic user of land, contributing to many environmental problems, including global warming and climate change.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Don't know how to google a document title? Perhaps that explains your frequent lack of facts. Here's a link to the PDF:sandinista wrote:do you have a link to that chart? I think you're the one cherry picking btw.
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publica ... _flows.pdf
And if I were cherry picking, I definitely wouldn't be quoting a UN document.
- sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media? - Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
I quoted a UN report as well.Warren Dew wrote:Don't know how to google a document title? Perhaps that explains your frequent lack of facts. Here's a link to the PDF:sandinista wrote:do you have a link to that chart? I think you're the one cherry picking btw.
http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publica ... _flows.pdf
And if I were cherry picking, I definitely wouldn't be quoting a UN document.


Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
To the contrary, you quoted a wikipedia page and a U.S. Humane Society report. You also didn't notice that the quotes don't actually support your position.sandinista wrote:I quoted a UN report as well.
- sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media? - Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
You got that one wrong. Most deforestation in Argentina and Brazil, for instance, occurs to make space for pastures that feed the cattle which are in turn produced for human consumption.Warren Dew wrote:Eating plants is responsible for the vast majority of deforestation that has occurred across human history. Beside agriculture, modern feedlots are a relatively minor concern.sandinista wrote:"Eating plants" does not come even close to the massive harm caused to the environment from factory farmed industrial meat.
Link. If you want more, look them up yourself.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Sheesh guys, read the numbers. The Amazon is not the only place that's being deforested. Most deforestation these days is occuring in Africa and Asia. That's why subsistence farming and mercantile farming account for five times as much deforesting as ranching.
But sure, I understand, vegetarianism is a religion, and adherents must reject any facts that might conflict with it.
But sure, I understand, vegetarianism is a religion, and adherents must reject any facts that might conflict with it.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Subsistence farming and mercantile farming have nothing to do with meat production?
I am not a vegetarian, and have no intention of becoming one.

I am not a vegetarian, and have no intention of becoming one.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Ranching was broken out separately. Again, read the quote from the U.N. report in my earlier post for the specific worldwide figures.Seraph wrote:Subsistence farming and mercantile farming have nothing to do with meat production?
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Ah. UN report. Right. Livestock farming appears to be ranked third in terms of total environmental impacts. Only vehicle manufacturing and pig iron/crude steel products are ahead of it. In terms of organic resources used it is first by a country mile. I put it to you that most of those resources are acquired at the cost of other land uses, particularly forests. Saying that eating plants is responsible for the vast majority of deforestation is utter rubbish. It flies in the face of the facts.Warren Dew wrote:Ranching was broken out separately. Again, read the quote from the U.N. report in my earlier post for the specific worldwide figures.Seraph wrote:Subsistence farming and mercantile farming have nothing to do with meat production?
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- Warren Dew
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
- Location: Somerville, MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
Take a look at the report I linked to, Seraph. It shows quite clearly that eating plants is #1 and #2 on the causes of deforestation - subsistence cultivation and nonsubsistence crop farming.
From the standpoint of greenhouse gases, sure, ranched animals fart more methane than do crops. But the fact is, if you replaced the ranched animals with wild animals, they'd still fart the same amount of methane into the air. That's not an environmental impact that's bad for nature - it's just bad for humans.
From the standpoint of greenhouse gases, sure, ranched animals fart more methane than do crops. But the fact is, if you replaced the ranched animals with wild animals, they'd still fart the same amount of methane into the air. That's not an environmental impact that's bad for nature - it's just bad for humans.
- Hermit
- Posts: 25806
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
- About me: Cantankerous grump
- Location: Ignore lithpt
- Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
I see no link anywhere, but if you are perchance referring to some data you inserted between code tags, you seem to have left out some rather telling figures from the rest of the table you cited: Deforestation/degradation of land due to large scale cattle ranching amounts to 1.6 million hectares per year. All other commercial agriculture is responsible for 2.6 million. Minor concern? I think not. Not even in comparison to subsistence farming (including wood gathering and non-timber forest products), which is responsible for 6.25 million hectares per year, especially considering how many mouths it feeds.Warren Dew wrote:Take a look at the report I linked to, Seraph. It shows quite clearly that eating plants is #1 and #2 on the causes of deforestation - subsistence cultivation and nonsubsistence crop farming.
For those who are interested in the full report and table, here is the actual link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/36921929/Inve ... ate-Change
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould
- sandinista
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
- About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media? - Contact:
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
The wonderful world of internet forums, even though Warren Dew has been shown to be wrong many times over, he will never admit to it. Oh well...that's the way it goes. 
anyway, the point that may have been lost by now was; coito is claiming "liberty" is the freedom to do whatever one wants...such as eating a bigshit. I questioned that...he responded that eating a mcshit burger does no harm to anyone therefore...liberty! On the contrary, it, very clearly, does harm to many.

anyway, the point that may have been lost by now was; coito is claiming "liberty" is the freedom to do whatever one wants...such as eating a bigshit. I questioned that...he responded that eating a mcshit burger does no harm to anyone therefore...liberty! On the contrary, it, very clearly, does harm to many.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.
Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?
It's gotten so bad around here that when you take the family out for a picnic in the woods, all you see are marauding bands of vegetarians gnawing at the tree trunks. Even the beavers have abandoned the woods, and moved into town where they can still find trees to build their dams with...Warren Dew wrote:Take a look at the report I linked to, Seraph. It shows quite clearly that eating plants is #1 and #2 on the causes of deforestation

''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh
—Rush Limbaugh
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests