Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post Reply

Should Ronald McDonald be banned?

Yes, ban him.
25
43%
No, don't ban him.
30
52%
Maybe/Not sure
3
5%
 
Total votes: 58

User avatar
Gallstones
Supreme Absolute And Exclusive Ruler Of The World
Posts: 8888
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:56 am
About me: A fleck on a flake on a speck.

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Gallstones » Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:48 pm

egbert wrote:
Gallstones wrote:I am really craving a cheeseburger loaded right now.

I think McDonald's is the only place still open.

Image
Yeah - see if the burger you ACTUALLY get looks anything like that ad agency propaganda lie.
You'll get a soggy bun with some frumpy lettuce showing, and a meat patty so small you can't even see it unless you lift off the top of the bun... :hehe:
Not when I make it at home. Mine might not be a perfectly disc shaped, but they pile up as well as that one.
But here’s the thing about rights. They’re not actually supposed to be voted on. That’s why they’re called rights. ~Rachel Maddow August 2010

The Second Amendment forms a fourth branch of government (an armed citizenry) in case the government goes mad. ~Larry Nutter

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by sandinista » Fri Apr 08, 2011 10:07 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
sandinista wrote:reference?

Code: Select all

Main direct drivers             Rate of Deforestation/Degradation (percentage)

Commercial agriculture:
Commercial crops                                        20
Cattle ranching (large scale)                           12

Subsistence farming:
Small scale agriculture/shifting cultivation            42
Fuel-wood and NTFP gathering                             6

Wood extraction:
Commercial (legal and illegal)                          14
Fuel-wood/charcoal (traded)                              5
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Investment and Financial Flows to Address Climate Change, 2007, p. 81.

Globally, subsistence farming is #1, farming of commercial crops is #2, and ranching is far behind at #4. But hey, feel free to cherry pick atypical regional data so you don't have to admit the truth.
admit the truth :lol: do you have a link to that chart? I think you're the one cherry picking btw.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2367646/
The farm animal sector is the single largest anthropogenic user of land, contributing to many environmental problems, including global warming and climate change.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:07 pm

sandinista wrote:do you have a link to that chart? I think you're the one cherry picking btw.
Don't know how to google a document title? Perhaps that explains your frequent lack of facts. Here's a link to the PDF:

http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publica ... _flows.pdf

And if I were cherry picking, I definitely wouldn't be quoting a UN document.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by sandinista » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:32 pm

Warren Dew wrote:
sandinista wrote:do you have a link to that chart? I think you're the one cherry picking btw.
Don't know how to google a document title? Perhaps that explains your frequent lack of facts. Here's a link to the PDF:

http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publica ... _flows.pdf

And if I were cherry picking, I definitely wouldn't be quoting a UN document.
I quoted a UN report as well. :yawn: yah, you're so full of sh...facts :lol:
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:52 pm

sandinista wrote:I quoted a UN report as well.
To the contrary, you quoted a wikipedia page and a U.S. Humane Society report. You also didn't notice that the quotes don't actually support your position.

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by sandinista » Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:05 am

Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Hermit » Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:54 am

Warren Dew wrote:
sandinista wrote:"Eating plants" does not come even close to the massive harm caused to the environment from factory farmed industrial meat.
Eating plants is responsible for the vast majority of deforestation that has occurred across human history. Beside agriculture, modern feedlots are a relatively minor concern.
You got that one wrong. Most deforestation in Argentina and Brazil, for instance, occurs to make space for pastures that feed the cattle which are in turn produced for human consumption.
Link. If you want more, look them up yourself.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:32 am

Sheesh guys, read the numbers. The Amazon is not the only place that's being deforested. Most deforestation these days is occuring in Africa and Asia. That's why subsistence farming and mercantile farming account for five times as much deforesting as ranching.

But sure, I understand, vegetarianism is a religion, and adherents must reject any facts that might conflict with it.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Hermit » Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:38 am

Subsistence farming and mercantile farming have nothing to do with meat production? :think:

I am not a vegetarian, and have no intention of becoming one.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:50 am

Seraph wrote:Subsistence farming and mercantile farming have nothing to do with meat production? :think:
Ranching was broken out separately. Again, read the quote from the U.N. report in my earlier post for the specific worldwide figures.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Hermit » Sat Apr 09, 2011 5:39 am

Warren Dew wrote:
Seraph wrote:Subsistence farming and mercantile farming have nothing to do with meat production? :think:
Ranching was broken out separately. Again, read the quote from the U.N. report in my earlier post for the specific worldwide figures.
Ah. UN report. Right. Livestock farming appears to be ranked third in terms of total environmental impacts. Only vehicle manufacturing and pig iron/crude steel products are ahead of it. In terms of organic resources used it is first by a country mile. I put it to you that most of those resources are acquired at the cost of other land uses, particularly forests. Saying that eating plants is responsible for the vast majority of deforestation is utter rubbish. It flies in the face of the facts.
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
Warren Dew
Posts: 3781
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 1:41 pm
Location: Somerville, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Warren Dew » Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:37 am

Take a look at the report I linked to, Seraph. It shows quite clearly that eating plants is #1 and #2 on the causes of deforestation - subsistence cultivation and nonsubsistence crop farming.

From the standpoint of greenhouse gases, sure, ranched animals fart more methane than do crops. But the fact is, if you replaced the ranched animals with wild animals, they'd still fart the same amount of methane into the air. That's not an environmental impact that's bad for nature - it's just bad for humans.

User avatar
Hermit
Posts: 25806
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:44 am
About me: Cantankerous grump
Location: Ignore lithpt
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by Hermit » Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:20 am

Warren Dew wrote:Take a look at the report I linked to, Seraph. It shows quite clearly that eating plants is #1 and #2 on the causes of deforestation - subsistence cultivation and nonsubsistence crop farming.
I see no link anywhere, but if you are perchance referring to some data you inserted between code tags, you seem to have left out some rather telling figures from the rest of the table you cited: Deforestation/degradation of land due to large scale cattle ranching amounts to 1.6 million hectares per year. All other commercial agriculture is responsible for 2.6 million. Minor concern? I think not. Not even in comparison to subsistence farming (including wood gathering and non-timber forest products), which is responsible for 6.25 million hectares per year, especially considering how many mouths it feeds.

For those who are interested in the full report and table, here is the actual link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/36921929/Inve ... ate-Change
I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops. - Stephen J. Gould

User avatar
sandinista
Posts: 2546
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:15 pm
About me: It’s a plot, but busta can you tell me who’s greedier?
Big corporations, the pigs or the media?
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by sandinista » Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:48 am

The wonderful world of internet forums, even though Warren Dew has been shown to be wrong many times over, he will never admit to it. Oh well...that's the way it goes. :bing:

anyway, the point that may have been lost by now was; coito is claiming "liberty" is the freedom to do whatever one wants...such as eating a bigshit. I questioned that...he responded that eating a mcshit burger does no harm to anyone therefore...liberty! On the contrary, it, very clearly, does harm to many.
Our struggle is not against actual corrupt individuals, but against those in power in general, against their authority, against the global order and the ideological mystification which sustains it.

User avatar
egbert
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Ban Ronald McDonald?

Post by egbert » Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:59 am

Warren Dew wrote:Take a look at the report I linked to, Seraph. It shows quite clearly that eating plants is #1 and #2 on the causes of deforestation
It's gotten so bad around here that when you take the family out for a picnic in the woods, all you see are marauding bands of vegetarians gnawing at the tree trunks. Even the beavers have abandoned the woods, and moved into town where they can still find trees to build their dams with... :ab:
''The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.''
—Rush Limbaugh

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests